Dark Horse

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation


About Dark Horse

  • Rank
    Mostly Harmless
  • Birthday

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

168 profile views
  2. Maybe they're just not "Seasoned" enough Squish... if you need to toughen them up, send 'em back to the fires for a while longer.
  3. Just FYI for anyone who catches it - in the mobile screenshots that I posted earlier, the Model List panel was showing a code error where it returned the No Models... message with the model list. Got it... Fixed! Silly stuff happens!
  4. I hope FOUR equipment slots will be enough for you Squish. (really the plan is to remove an item from the select list when it is added to the unit/model - and obviously replace it if you delete a given item - there is currently no limit - so you could theoretically add one of each piece of equipment.) Hope that works for you... PS: Sorry I haven't gotten far enough to post a screenshot of what the roster will look like with these changes.
  5. Here is the mockup just finished of what the unit will look like when adding equipment. Musician and Standard Bearer I think I am going to have as a button in the troop header - click the appropriate button and it automagically adds that "equipment" as a unit. This allows the equipment items to stay with the model and in the roster printout, will be indented under the model where the equipment was "attached". If anyone has any better ideas, please speak up quickly, as I will be coding this mockup within the next day or so for sure.
  6. Maybe - I haven't read ALL of the doctrines for the factions, but Hound should be easy - either autopopulate the first troop with Garr if that doctrine is selected or provide a "notice" bar that says you should add Garr to a unit for this doctrine... or something to that affect. Given that you can "move" the orientation of the troops up and down, you can always drag the Hounds Troop to a spot below your Troop A/Command Troop if you want to keep things tidy. Oh yes, I have made what I think is a significant change to the unit container already - I have added pics of the figs, that will change as you select your model.
  7. Thought I would toss up some screenshots of the app on an iphone 4 for folks to see how it looks on a small mobile device. The magic tomes/spells and equipment pages need some more tweaking for mobile, so not depicted here.
  8. It is an online tool, and since Army Builder and Battlescribe already fill that standalone slot, I don't see where another similar tool is really needed... I could be wrong - wouldn't be the first time. The intention was to create a replacement for the official tool that was taken down.
  9. Thanks for the answer, I will have to work on trying to find that data from somewhere.
  10. Warlord

    I am looking at a way to resolve that... It sort of works in alpha code, so it will likely eventually find its way into the final codebase. I need to give core functionality priority still at this point. Anyway, in the meantime (once it is made available publicly) you could enter them like [Armor, Weapon, Book] and then add the costs of each piece up and put that value in the cost field. Note: The equipment cost field is computed with the model multiplier. (Giving you this now because I might forget to later if it doesn't come up again.)
  11. How about a preview of that new unofficial Army Creator showing a couple of army builds... Note: there were no faction doctrines entered for Tembrithil at the time of the screenshot, so there was no doctrine to select.
  12. Warlord

    Fear not Warlord Fans... How about a preview from the new unofficial Army Creator depicting a Tembrithil army. Note: The faction doctrines have not been entered for Tembrithil so there was no doctrine to select.
  13. Speaking of Razig... I haven't found anything on them in the books, is there a place where I can find datacard info??
  14. Awesome Job! It really enhances the look of this model in a way I had never envisioned.
  15. Thank You... the "RAV" was a typo, but the clarification certainly doesn't hurt and I realized I had not gone back and edited that in the original post in case someone just skims the topic in the future and misses the correction. I went back and scanned all of the data cards that were setup this way and made whatever corrections were necessary in the database - thanks to all who provided clarification.