Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Cav'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Reaper Discussion
    • FAQs 'n Stuff
    • News
    • Reaper General
    • Chronoscope
    • Bones Miniatures & Legendary Encounters
    • ReaperCon
  • Craft Corner
    • Show Off
    • Painting Tips & Advice
    • Works In Progress
    • Speed / Army / Tabletop Techniques
    • Shutterbug
    • Conversions, Presentation, and Terrain
    • Sculpting
    • Mini Exchanges and Paint Contests
  • Reaper Games
    • CAV
    • Warlord
  • General Discussion
    • General Fantasy
    • General Sci-Fi
    • General Modern / Historical
    • Kickstarter
    • Off-Topic Rampancy
  • The Sandbox
    • The Gathering
    • The Playing
    • Fiction, Poetry, and Other Abuses

Calendars

  • Reaper

Found 175 results

  1. Firedrake Blueprint

    Happy holidays, CAV community!
  2. Hi all, I just finished a CAV dictator and went to put him on his standard hex base, when I realized his "bones" base is too large. I have already painted and sealed it and was wondering what the best way to remove the base was to minimize damage?
  3. CAV secret santa Dictator

    Hi all, Been working on a CAV Dictator for the secret santa exchange, and wanted to use it to not only explore rach color schemes, but also to continue to develop my skills with edge highlighting and blending (canopy). I am really happy with how it came out, though I still need a lot of practice. Brush control is getting better but is still far from perfect! Obviously still needs a base; C&C welcome!
  4. So I've completed my CAV:SO Christmas Exchange piece and thought I'd post it here. I'm using my "speed painting" technique thats cut down my paint time for desert jobs at the moment. I'm pretty pleased with how it turned out and pleased with my new photo set up.
  5. So, signed up for the CAV Secret Santa exchange over in the CAV subforums, and needed to put up WIP pictures etc. But why do pictures when you can do video, eh?! If you're in on the CAV Secret Santa, you can click the spoilers below to see the pictures and video as well, but you'll, uh, be spoiling it for you if you're the one on my list. And you could be. But maybe you aren't.
  6. Started working on a Terran Thunderbird, and I don't have pictures yet. But it's really not much more then primed at this point. I'm going to do a woodlands camo pattern I think, so I based the whole thing with a sandy tan color and did the dark lining on it. A friend of mine that Talespinner knows as "my pretend friend Rick" suggested that I start with the lightest color which makes sense. I used the brown liner to do the dark lining. Question is what to do next, should I paint most of it green and leave parts tan, and then paint the brown parts, and then finally black? Or would it be better to paint parts green, and parts brown and parts black? Also is there anything I should do before I start the camo pattern?
  7. CAV: SO Ritterlich Cougar squadron 72208

    Hi all, It has been a really busy year for me, between moving across the country, starting a new job, finding a place to live, getting married, major surgery for the missus, and evacuating/rebuilding after a major hurricane. Unfortunately, this has left little time for painting- and it’s been driving me nuts! After the wedding a few weeks back, we finally had some time to take a step back and breathe. The wife poked me and said “why don’t you start painting again?” The first thing I picked up was this squad of half-finished Ritterlich Republic cougars I had been working on last winter before the move. They had been painted and inked, but not assembled, highlighted or jeweled. I’ve been working on them a few hours at a time over the past few weeks, and finally had a big chunk of the day yesterday where I could sit down and power through them… here they are! I still need to do the bases, but I couldn’t do that last night as the glue was still drying. They will also get a matte varnish coat, but I'd like to get your C&C on a few things before then. As I have mentioned before, this is from the CAV kickstarter; one of the things I wanted to do with the kickstarter CAVs was to explore a different painting technique for each army. For the Ritter, this was edging. As time went on, I started to become a bit fatigued at the sheer amount of edging required. This caused me to slowly rotate from display quality (for me at least) to more tabletop quality. But hey, a painted mini is always better than an unpainted one, and easing up a bit on the quality allowed me to finish them quickly. I am also trying to incorporate more blending in the canopies, as well as some OSL effects. As you can see, I am still practicing. I expect I will get better with time (at least I hope I do)! As always, C & C are very welcome. I am trying to get better and I can’t do that without critique. Any comments about how to improve the jeweling or OSL in particular would be most appreciated. If anyone wants the paints or techniques used, I can provide that information too.
  8. CAV color schemes

    So I have 4 Rach and 4 Terran models assembled and ready to be painted. But I'm wondering about color schemes. I see in the CAV:SO book that a lot of Rach are red with white stripes/accent so I think I may do that. But I'm not sure what to do with the terran's... is OD green/camo the most common or are there other color schemes that are used in the current lore? I mean I could paint them pretty much whatever I want... But I like to have them match the lore, but I'm also not sure I want to do camo (just got done painting a 101st Airborne list for Bolt Action), so if there's some other common scheme I'd do that, but if not then OD Green/camo it is.
  9. Re-purposing this post to give SS updates. Name Has PM'd Info Wip Photo Posted (Due 12/1/2017) Model Delivered @emmagine Yes @CAVBOSS Yes Yes @Weird-O Yes Yes @Mastergunz Yes Yes @hjorhrafn Yes @Jeneki Yes @Dilvish the Deliverer Yes Yes @Ludo Yes Yes @Savage Coyote Yes Yes @Pegazus Yes Yes @NomadZeke Yes @CitizenCane Yes Yes @SparksMurphey Yes Yes @Guyscanwefocusplease Yes Yes Remember we're doing this to have fun and make friends. Chat, share tips, tease us with WIP photos or text - but don't give away who you're painting for. CAVa Claus is watching... :) J-- ############### ORIGINAL POST BELOW ######################## I come to the Reaper Forums from the Privateer Press forums. In my time there I got involved with a Secret Santa (SS) exchange where a group of people got together and agreed to paint and gift a model for a randomly selected member of the SS exchange. In an effort to generate more community activity on the CAV forums I'm curious if there is any interest in a CAV-centric gift exchange? I haven't put together my thoughts on how to organize it yet but thought I'd see if their was enough interest to make it work. I like CAV, I like the Reaper forums but the CAV sub-forums seem very, very quiet. I'd honestly like to get to know more of you and what better way than to paint a mini for my CAV neighbor in the spirit of the season. J--
  10. Some thoughts on The CavCon tournament. The Good: The tournament was well organized. The terrain looked great. Jon and Tim were available to answer questions and explain the reasons behind various decisions at any time. I've never had more one on one time to interact with a game developer ever. Jon went out of his way to walk me though several parts of the game that I didn't understand and he was open to feedback to improve the game for me (and hopefully others). The veteran players Todd Farnholtz, Ross Hines, and Brandon Baker were friendly, open, and available to explain both the rules and their thoughts about the 'meta'. Todd and Ross are also fabulous painters with lots of experience in the niche of painting giant robots to look like giant robots. They shared tips and feedback with me which I appreciate a lot, The Bad: The tournament terrain looked awesome but it's nature and layout limited the kinds of forces that were viable in the tournament. The tallest piece of cover on the boards I saw was a level 3 hill. That is it in the background of the photo where my figures - in red and grey - are learning the meaning of the phrase 'shock check'. :) The deployment zone of my opponent (Ross Hines) had an elevation 2 hill just outside of it. All Ross had to do was walk forward for one activation and then his CAVs - in blue and black - were at elevation 4 which lets him see over the highest elevation terrain on the board. On his first turn he could fire Guided Missiles 6" deployment + 7" Move + 64" Extreme range = 77". The playing area is only 72" long. [Edited to correct the Silverback's movement from 5" to 7"] I literally had no where to hide from his fire. Additionally, being at elevation 4 allowed him to see over the intervening 'woods' which are only elevation 3. I could only gain the benefit of cover by hugging against it within one inch. The trees did serve to slow down my forward progress as I had to either go around them or spend extra movement to go through them. I've only played about a dozen games of CAV so I may be missing an aspect of the terrain rules or some strategy that mitigates the lack of LOS blocking terrain. The Excellent: The people. The models. The game. No better example of good people than Jeff my second round opponent. He is a veteran CAV player who helped me through the rules I was unfamiliar with and shared numerous stories about the history of the game. The new Firedrake model is beautiful. I love it's angular lines and the compactness of it's rocket launchers - I bought 6 of them. :) The game plays fast once you get several games under your belt. The rules flow logically and I found by the end of the tournament I rarely had to ask how something worked. Perhaps the last and best compliment that I can give is that I'm already planning my next force. I have the paint scheme in mind and plan to experiment with heavily weathered CAVs. I hope to meet and play CAV with all of you at the tournament next year.
  11. New CAV mini

    Don't know who might follow this forum and not be a member of the Reaper/CAV Facebook group but there is a new CAV mini for sale at ReaperCon. It is called a Firedrake and is open to all factions. There are pictures and stats on the Facebook pages. J--
  12. Terran Infantry for CAV

    Hi, I found a pack of these little buggers in the 1$ bin of my FLGS. They are 15mm "flames of war" minis (WWII type) and I though I could try to make use of them for my CAV infantry. I just modernized them a bit with some green-stuff goggles (which has the advantage of not making me paint eyes on 15mm minis and match the canopies of my Terran CAV) and did speed paint. Here is the result: They are a bit big for CAV, especially next to a transport vehicle, but they will do for the purpose of the game. Other pic for scale:
  13. CAV 72231 Cataphract

    Here's a Ritterlich Cataphract attack CAV painted in the 5th Dornheim Brigade's scheme. The Cataphract is available for sale and this is one of the grey bones miniatures from the first kickstarter!
  14. CAV Lion II tank

    Here is the CAV Lion II anti-grav tank from the upcoming kickstarter. This resin master turned out great; the final will be in the grey Bones used by CAV! Scheme is from the 5th Dornheim Brigade, "Marienburg Dragoons." Their tanks are painted a dark grey while the CAVs wear the light blue and black.
  15. CAV Cheetah

    Hey all! Here is a resin master of the new upcoming Cheetah attack CAV! I've painted it in the scheme of the 5th Dornheim Brigade, "Marienburg Dragoons." The forthcoming model will be in the CAV grey bones which also paint up pretty nice!
  16. A pile of Cavcon

    Getting started on my Cavcon models. Fielding a Templar army from scratch in 2017 is a bit of work. Thanks to @Vil-hatarn and @Watchman for helping me find them. :-] J--
  17. I'm confused by what SA: TAG does in CAV. In the SO rules on page 124-125 it is never clear what a TAG does - at least not to me. In the errata, it says that, "...the attacker may "paint" and fire guided missiles at a designated target during the same combat action." In the SO rules page 113 it says that Guided Missile require either a Target Lock or a TAG in order to fire. In the SO rules page 115 it says that rockets with the'semi-guided' upgrade (page 136) can take advantage of TAG. Here are my questions: Does the TAG confer a Target Lock? Does the TAG allow the use of a targeting computer bonus against the painted target? Can the TAG be used by other units in the friendly force? If it cannot and it can only benefit Guided Missiles and semi-guided Rockets then why does the Spartan who has no GMs and no Rockets have a TAG? I looked through all of the data sheets and I found 17 models with the SA:TAG. Of those 17 only 5 had GMs and none had semi-guided Rockets. I must be missing something. Why would all of those units have TAG if they can't make use of it? Thanks for your time and understanding. J--
  18. I'm trying parse this paragraph from the rules packet. I think I understand it but as a noob I could use some confirmation. Aircraft, infantry, and vehicle models are not eligible for use during this tournament. We're only allowed to bring CAVs. Bonus points [not allowed] Normally, a force group gets 20% of its threat value pool in points to spend on specializations from Battlefield: upgrades, support assets, support strikes. We don't get any of these points. specialization assets and packages [not allowed] Normally, a force gets 10% of its threat value pool to spend on additional force group specializations, We don't get any of these points. What I think this boils down to is that we're to play CAVs only, using the stats printed on the datasheets with no modifications. We have exactly 5000 points to spend - no bonuses. Is this right...? Thanks for your help! J--
  19. Cavcon Tournament who is going?

    After annoying Cavboss (sorry) I finally got signed up for the tournament. Looking forward to meeting some of you there. I have a pile of unpainted Grand Order of the Temple metal CAV piled on my desk that I've worked fairly hard to collect. I plan to play 100% painted. [crosses fingers] I've only played 3 games so far so forgive me when I get stuff wrong. J--
  20. I searched the forum and tried to find an answer to my question(s) before posting but could not. I'm not sure what the accepted policy is on quoting the rules in the forums so if I've broken a rule please forgive me. In the CAV:SO book page 57 bullet point 3 under Field Notes says that a Target Lock is required before a Guided Missile is fired or it will auto-miss - [paraphrased] The CAV: Errata says to replace the third paragraph (by which I think they mean bullet point) with a paragraph that includes this line: "The target-lock action can be used by a model to acquire an active “lock” on a target as part of a ranged assault that includes guided missiles (see Guided Missile, p. 112). ..." Does making a ranged assault with a Guided Missile require 2 actions (1 for the Target Lock and 1 for the Ranged Assault)? Or Does making a ranged assault with a Guided Missile require 1 action that includes the Target Lock and the Ranged Assault together? Or Something else I've missed. Thanks J--
  21. Hedgehog Transport

    I can't find which faction uses the Hedgehog transport in the list of faction vehicles I downloaded from the Talon Games site. Can someone explain to me who can use it? Thanks! J--
  22. Model Selection

    I only see 54 models available for CAV on the Reaper Minis CAV page. A casual search of the internet shows most second hand sources offering the same set of miniatures. I'd really like to paint a Grand Order of the Temple force but there don't seem to be enough minis available to make one. Am I missing something? Is there a source for the other models? Perhaps for the older metal models..? Thanks! J--
  23. CAV Regent

    I also painted this guy a while ago. just now getting pictures up of some of what I've been working on. It's legs aren't actually glued on, just tight fitting enough to stay on their own so I just left them like that for now.
  24. I'd like to start off with a big "THANK YOU!" to CAVBOSS for all the goodies to give away and the slick, color advertising booklets for CAV. They made it really easy to show people where to go for more information, see the model pricing (everyone marveled at how affordable it was to make an army!), and get a copy of the quick-start rules. On top of that, it was great to be able to say that a force construction program, status markers, data cards, errata, etc. were all available for free from the game's main site. This is a huge plus, in my opinion. Many thanks to Troy (squatwarlord) for setting everything up with Nashcon and to Hugh for creating the excellent terrain & command bunker! Everyone had to deal with my novice painting skills and truly random dice. The demo was set as a Rach force engaging a Terran bunker installation on Hellspire. As most of us had never run a demo before, we started off small, with a CAV squad on each side, no faction doctrines or CP. Each player handled two CAV a piece. The Terrans had a TVP and firepower edge, which would become a big problem with the Rach force being split on separate sides of the map. Despite the valiant efforts of the Rach Kahn to ECM the daylights out of the Terran Talon II, the Terran Starhawks forced the Rach Gnomic into hiding. The Terran Falcon acted as a Sentry, allowing the Starhawks to pull an about-face, crest the center hill and focus-fire the Rach Dictators into oblivion one by one. The game ended with a decisive victory for the defending Terrans. For round 2, we added a squad of tanks to each side - 2x Despots & 2x Malefactors for the Rach, 2x Wolves & 2x Dingoes for the Terrans. This leveled the TVP field and added some interesting behaviors (read: berserker Malefactors). We added some new players and Hugh joined in the action for his first game of CAV:SO as well. Squads kept themselves much more coherent this round, but the Rach Gnomic took a beating at the start of the match when it was caught as the only visible target. That meant it would be late to the carnage party... The Rach wasted no time focusing fire on one of the Starhawks, exacting harsh vengeance on the Terrans for daring to draw first blood (the aforementioned Gnomic that nearly bit the dust on the first activation of the game). The exchange of fire after that was fierce and quite brutal. <insert minor break for lunch> The Rach became quite bloodthirsty after the pause in the action. The Terrans faught valiantly (particularly the Falcon), but it couldn't stop the Rach Dictators and Despots. And everyone learned the joy (and terror) that is a Malefactor's overdriven PBG at point blank range... The Rach claimed an overwhelming victory, leaving (mostly) Terran wreckage in their wake: For the final round of the day, we flipped the script and moved the terrain around a bit to see what happens when the Terrans attack a Rach installation. We introduced command points and faction doctrines, with the Terrans choosing Air Superiority (free gunship assaults each round), and the Rach taking Children of the Storm (+2 MV, -1 Armor, extra +1 at point-blank range). We split the forces into 4 2-model squads due to the high player count. I forgot to take a pic of the setup. Oops. The Terrans attempted a guarded assault, hoping to draw the Rach in one-by-one into a heavy crossfire. This could have worked, were it not for insanely good rolls for the Rach (lots of crits). Despite frequently burning out their PBGs for one round, the Malefactors consistently struck for 4 damage (ouch!). The Malefactors kept the Starhawks busy enough for the Dictators to close, turning the battle into a close-range scrum. It should be noted here that the Malefactor and Wolf machine guns were responsible for multiple (3, I believe) kill shots. You don't need a high DV against hard targets if you roll a 10+ at point blank range with a heavily damaged target... I didn't grab any extra pictures of the game after that point. The fighting was brutal for both sides, leading me to introduce everyone to the Regroup action as the Rach tried to seize the EW advantage - the Terran Talon II had been killed, but the Kahn was left squad-less. In the end, we called it draw with a couple of CAV and tanks left on each side. It should probably be noted that despite taking a pounding from multiple heavy hits from the Dictators and multiple guided missile hits, as well as being "piloted" by different players, the Terran Talon II never failed a pilot check or suppression roll the entire day. Not a one. Nerves of steel for Terran recon pilots, I suppose. :) Thanks to everyone who played and chatted about the game. We had a blast! The Nashcon organizers seemed quite happy to have some sci-fi action in the sea of historical games. So maybe we'll do this again next year with Adon vs Ritterlich? I'll close with hastily taken pictures of each side's forces. If I ever figure out how to black-wash and decorate a base properly, I promise to finish these off. -Grom (Chris) PS - Gary (who played in the first round demo), if you happen to spot this - PM me, I forgot to grab your contact info!
  25. Hello All, Newbie here I though Id share a project that I've been working on to use when we play Talon Games Combat assault vehicle (CAV) when being shown the game I wasn't sure about lying the metal figures on there side to show they are destroyed or just removing them from the table I wanted something to represent them on the table as obstacles for troops and vehicles. So here it is as it stands I took a metal unmade Cav and positioned it on some putty added a few rocks and used the Oamaru to made a mould after moulding I painted it up (not finished yet) but you get the idea
×