Comparative merits of Reaper figures (split from Reaper's New Look)
Posted 17 February 2012 - 09:16 AM
Posted 17 February 2012 - 02:55 PM
It is a comparison of apples to rocks. GW is a completely insulated art style that supports their in house products. Reaper draws from all sorts of art styles and creates support products for games and the general hobby of painting. The only thing we had in common was that we both made metal models, and now we don't even have that in common.
I too love a lot of GW models and they are the king of their style. We have produced GW style pieces in the long ago past, but they didnt really sell well. If you want to field a squad of GW Pincha Nipple Boyz in your army you are inclined to buy the official Pincha Nipple Boyz, not some Pincha Nipple Boyz knock off. Converesley if you are in a dungeon and encounter orcs, you are probably not expecting to run into a group of Pincha Nipple Boyz.
So in the end, we could make more stuff that looks like their stuff and they could make a paint that works like our paint. Which one is better is always in the eye of the beholder...
- parvusmachina likes this
"mix not nipples in a box, for they shall close their nipple thingy" Bryviticus 1:12
Posted 17 February 2012 - 02:57 PM
Also, after having been to the last 4-5-6 ReaperCons, I have built up a relationship with the sculptors themselves. And I admit that definitely influences my opinions. They talk and laugh with me. They listen to my suggestions. Even had a few of my ideas turn into metal. AND I am not special when it comes to that. The sculptors have made themselves available to many RCon goers.
Lastly, I am a gamer, and I play the Reaper Warlord game. So, I tend to buy the Reaper minis to play that game. Do I wish the Warlord game were as widely popular as the GW games? Sure I do. But, in the end regardless, I still enjoy playing it and still find myself buying more models for it.
If I played the GW games then I would probably answer that I bought GW stuff more. But, I am not. hence...
My CMON gallery
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:35 PM
That's subjective. I think that Reaper has a lot of models that looks better than a lot of GW models, and GW has a lot of models that look better than a lot of Reaper models. Reaper's Best > GW's mediocre/terrible, but GW's Best > Reaper's mediocre/terrible. The difference between Reaper's Best and GW's best is not huge, although GW has a totally different art style, and aesthetic, so what are you judging by? Talent of scultpor? I say tied. Overall aesthetic? I'd say that's so bloody subjective who's to say which is better, one can only say which one prefers. There's also the factor that the limitations of metal and plastic and resin are all different, so GW can do things that would never work in metal, and Reaper isn't using that kind of plastic model kit, so it does amazing things with metal work.
ok it seems my post was removed but the question still stands why pick reaper over games workshop gw models look way better but reaper paints are alot better
im serious I'd really like to hear what you people have to say this is out honest curiosity im a gamer just like the rest of you and enjoy the painting more so I buy from reaper and am a fan of the paints and brushes I just see alot of people steer away GW for many different reasons and I'd like to hear from some of you guys who I'm hoping ,by reading these posts, are big fans of reaper i'm not here to make fun or cause a hard time for anyone promise.
Having been to the Reaper factory, I'd say I like Reaper because they're real people, and really pretty cool. They let us come in, take tours, and watch the process. We get questions answered, and can hang out with the guy who does the concept art, the sculptors, and the painters, not to mention chatting with the CEO and all the employees. They aren't a huge megacoporation, they're a dozen people working in a warehouse having fun doing it, and they care about their customers.
I have no direct experience with GW employees outside of the GW store near my house, but the internet is full of horror stories about how they abuse players, and fans and have crappy customer service ad loyalty skills. They're all anecdotal evidence, so I could be 100% wrong, but the Reaper guys are like a family, and they treat their customers like friends.
That's why I choose Reaper.
And yes, I do buy the occasional really cool model from GW. But I have a lot more Reaper minis than GW minis.
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:38 PM
I like Reaper and other manufacturers who put out more traditional high fantasy style pieces. I also started out doing a lot more RPGS than wargaming, so I needed single figures of a variety of characters. A boxed set of 12 knights, no matter how cool, wasn't going to come home with me. And at the time, a single GW character was costing around $4 when Reaper came on the market with $1 figures.
Finally -- and this comes back to variety -- back in 93 and 94, when Reaper was just starting they were putting out more new female figures than Grenadier and Ral Partha combined. I think this is still a huge draw for painters. Twenty years ago they were scarce and I went out of my way to find them, so I was really pleased by the new offerings. It's still mostly what I buy. GW has, what, a dozen female sculpts and I can't think of anything really new in the past 10 years.
"I got my brother and his six year old hooked last week. They were soon back at the friendly local for more. Starts with a cute lil unicorn, next thing you're onto griffins and purple worms." ~ Carnacki the Ghost Finder
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:44 PM
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:49 PM
I prefer the goblins that Megamini produces from molds that they purchased from Hobby Products.
I like GWs ratmen & most of their beastmen, orcs are a wash, some of GW's are better, some or Reaper's are better.
I think Reapers lizardmen (not Reptus) are superior to GW's version, even with their old school style
For Wild West figs it used to be Black Scorpion because Reaper didnt have many, that has changed.
and of course all of this is personal opinion, as was your original post
Anything I paint that turns out better than tabletop is purely by accident!
Visit the Dirty 30s! - A sourcebook for Pulp RPGs... now with 10% More PULP!
Selling 30 years of gaming material, visit my eBay store!
Hirst Molds: 40, 45, 54, 55, 56, 60, 63, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 80, 84, 85, 86, 201, 203, 205, 235, 250, 260, 281, 282, 320, 321
Posted 17 February 2012 - 04:37 PM
1. I don't play their games anymore (got sick of trying to keep up every time they released a new edition). If I'm not playing 40K, I don't need Space Marines for anything.
2. Value for the money - GW minis are expensive. Sometimes very expensive. Last I looked, a large monster-sized GW mini was going for about $50. A similarly large monster from Reaper might go for $20 or $30.
- nytflyr likes this
2014 Stats: 16 painted, 21 purchased. 16/2 - 21 = -13
My painting blog: http://minipainterjen.blogspot.com/
Posted 17 February 2012 - 08:45 PM
It's all about variety. Reaper can give me things GW chooses not to.
Posted 18 February 2012 - 08:22 AM
Posted 18 February 2012 - 11:36 AM
Reaper's Warlord is a cheaper game to play because of the number of figures you need to play, but were you to build a GW army from Reaper products you would be taking out a first and second mortgage. The games are also different, one is skirmish the other is mass combat. They are both decent games but comparing the two is an apples to oranges comparison. Don't get me wrong I love Warlord but the problem is Reaper isn't a game company and so Warlord game support is fan based. Until Reaper hires real game designers and actualy markets their game Warlord will never become a game anyone is talking about.
Now as of late Reaper has been phoning it in on their newer Warlord and Dark Heaven products, while Savage Worlds and Pathfinder has gotten the nice looking new hottness. My annoyance has been with Warlord products having awesome concept art and, recently, the model just completely falls short. Now I'll grant there have been some winners but it seems like they're becoming the exception instead of the rule.
2014 Painting Goal: 6 Figures/ 36 Painted as of 01/22/2014
For other Wargame and miniature related stuff you can read my blog at http://tacticalrock.blogspot.com
Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?
... nobody remembers Slave Leia because, "Oh my gosh! What innovative use of bronze."
Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:28 PM
Reaper has the largest selection for fantasy minis anywhere. And they have access to many of my favourite sculptors.
Posted 19 February 2012 - 12:08 PM
I also have tons of models. My favorite companies are (in no order) Reaper, Freebooter, PP, Rackam, Cypher, Andrea, Ral Partha, Grendier, and more.
From what I've heard, GW no longer has sculptors. They use CAD programmers and 3d copiers. How lame is that! I have never seen a GW model that I liked. Their fine cast... more like fail cast. The only reason I bought them was I needed the models to play the game. Their game is no longer balanced and just too expensive. GW is not fun anymore.
It all boils down to: I can get a very nice Reaper model for $5US... or I can get a crappy GW model for $10US. Reaper is about people, GW is about money. Reaper is inclusive, GW is elitist.
Posted 20 February 2012 - 12:50 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users