Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Bonwirn

Warlord and the Sci-Fi theme of Reapercon 2015

15 posts in this topic

I am trying to get a head start on a theme game for Reapercon 2015 using the Warlord Rules and the RAGE system.

 

I think the "monsters" can translate fairly well for what I am thinking.  However, to use minis like the Nova Corp, who have ranged weaponry, can melee up close, etc...  How would you translate that or What datacards would you start with to not totally imbalance the game.

 

Issues I am seeing...  using soldiers with ranged weapons isn't as "hit or miss" as archery and spears.  The soldiers should hit (MAV) as frequently as knights in combat, not the 2s and 3s for ranged combat, I was thinking more like 4s and 5s...  but that would overpower them to have 4s and 5s for melee... or should those be reduced to 2s and 3s...

 

Spell usages... combined with technology, replaced by technology, or just not existant?

 

replaced means casters are RPG carrying folks with different types of grenades...

 

Healers are medics, but need to be within X" to help (versus a spell just needing LOS)?

 

 

Am I getting too bogged down in the mechanics?

 

What are your thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't have the depth of experience with Warlord 1.0 that some on here do, I think you have rediscovered the over-powered ranged combat that plagued said edition.

 

If you are going to bump up ranged combat stats, then I would suggest making everyone a ranged combatant.  I personally think The Other GameTM has some seriously ridiculous problems with super-science blaster folk running up to each other to hit them with swords.

 

I guess you could do a couple things like decking out your up-close-and-personal fighters with DR and heavy Defect bonuses (assuming you don't have too many Marksman SAs).

 

Bogged down in mechanics?  Pah!  If we don't want mechanics we can just play checkers.

 

=-Jake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also - I and one or two others are working on a quickplay buckets-o-d6 ruleset for a participation game at RCon 2015, using Chronoscope SF figures.  It's not RAGE, but I thought I'd throw that out there.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just choose which cards to use.  I'd go with some of the cards for the Elites with ranged attacks.  Just use those for your grunts.  It shouldn't bee too hard to rock out with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Castlebuilder and Reaper have already done the heavy lifting converting Warlord/RAGE into a ranged combat focused game called Cowboys and Gunslingers. I'd recommend grabbing the rules and Data Cards here (http://www.reapermini.com/Games/CowboysandGunslingers), and just tweaking them to suit your needs. Regarding game mechanics, for Convention games, the easier and speedier the better.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't have the depth of experience with Warlord 1.0 that some on here do, I think you have rediscovered the over-powered ranged combat that plagued said edition.

 

If you are going to bump up ranged combat stats, then I would suggest making everyone a ranged combatant.  I personally think The Other GameTM has some seriously ridiculous problems with super-science blaster folk running up to each other to hit them with swords.

 

I guess you could do a couple things like decking out your up-close-and-personal fighters with DR and heavy Defect bonuses (assuming you don't have too many Marksman SAs).

 

Bogged down in mechanics?  Pah!  If we don't want mechanics we can just play checkers.

 

=-Jake

It's ok, you can say 40k without the GW Inquisition showing up at your door.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also ask me to share the data cards I already have made up for Nova Corp, IMEF, and assorted other critters & characters.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comments in after **  to make them easier to spot


 


Issues I am seeing...  using soldiers with ranged weapons isn't as "hit or miss" as archery and spears.  The soldiers should hit (MAV) as frequently as knights in combat, not the 2s and 3s for ranged combat, I was thinking more like 4s and 5s...  but that would overpower them to have 4s and 5s for melee... or should those be reduced to 2s and 3s...


**Raising RAV is OK, if you have either Monsters with 5+ damage tracks, or if you have a TONS of terrain so most everyone can move from cover to cover.  You can also reduce DV so that things that survive the 'no man's land' of the range combat that they just walk through things in Melee a la Starship Troopers.   So things can balance out overall


 


Spell usages... combined with technology, replaced by technology, or just not existant?


replaced means casters are RPG carrying folks with different types of grenades...


**Some spells can be tech, but in an infinite universe should not spells be a thing?


 


Healers are medics, but need to be within X" to help (versus a spell just needing LOS)?


**Who is to say that healers don't have guns that fire hypodermic rounds filled with medical nanites.  CP then becomes RAV with the specific ballistics of these types of delivery systems


 


 


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am trying to get a head start on a theme game for Reapercon 2015 using the Warlord Rules and the RAGE system.

 

[ ... ]

 

Am I getting too bogged down in the mechanics?

 

What are your thoughts?

 

 

Also - I and one or two others are working on a quickplay buckets-o-d6 ruleset for a participation game at RCon 2015, using Chronoscope SF figures.  It's not RAGE, but I thought I'd throw that out there.

 

Looking forward to trying both. I would like to register some mild disappointment in advance if figures armed with lazer rifles / beam weapons are saddled with range bands. Just once I would like to see a tabletop game where the figures equipped with high-tech weapons can shoot to the ranges such things could really reach. (Or for that matter a .44 calibre rifle round...)

 

  • Winchester Rifle on a 4x4 foot table -?- 'short' range is 6 feet.
  • PhazarZap Rifle on a 4x4 foot table -?-  'short' range is 6 feet.

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

 

While you are correct about ranges, my counter argument is that accuracy decreases significantly once the shooter is put under stress.  I always got a kick out of the guys at the Police Range who bragged about being such great shots but fell apart if you made them do anything but stand still and aim.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

While you are correct about ranges, my counter argument is that accuracy decreases significantly once the shooter is put under stress.  I always got a kick out of the guys at the Police Range who bragged about being such great shots but fell apart if you made them do anything but stand still and aim.

 

Quite true.

 

But in a combat situation those guys will burn the rounds anyway.

 

So in a table-top game, particularly modern, contemporary, or sci-fi ... if the little gun toting minis are not blazing away on even a remote chance of hitting I find it ... disappointing.

 

It is the game mechanic that bugs me: the chance of hitting at that distance is very small ---therefore that distance is "out of range"--- and the rules wind up effectively declaring a bullet flies less distance than a BB. Needs a better mechanic.

_________________________________________________________

 

There is this --- with beam weapons sci-fi author Larry Niven posited this technique: "...Shoot, then aim..."

(Emit sustained laser, swing it onto target...)

 

Nobody really knows how beam weapons will work in practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out Tomorrow's War. Your range is the table.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It is the game mechanic that bugs me: the chance of hitting at that distance is very small ---therefore that distance is "out of range"--- and the rules wind up effectively declaring a bullet flies less distance than a BB. Needs a better mechanic.

 

 

This is why I like the ranged mechanic in Cowboys and Gunslingers. Nothing has a maximum range, you just take cumulative "to hit" penalties as the range increases. 

 

I think the problem with the mechanic you point out of the odds being so small that the target becomes "out of range" is due to the dice system of the game used. 40K uses a d6, therefore the lowest odds of hitting something becomes 16.6%. That's still pretty good odds. With RAGE's d10 system, that lowers to 10%. Still not too bad. If you really wanted an "unlimited" range mechanic, you might want to go to a d20 system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my game, ranged weapons are "table" in range, and I'm pondering how to differentiate pistols from rifles.

 

I want to finish up some of the other sections then I'll post a call for playtest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, just putting this in here: accuracy in real-life combat tends to be abysmal, BUT, Defiance Vital Ground can assign unlimited range to any weapon you like, you just have to stat it up as such. And pay for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By OvantheWise
      Thought I would Try my hand at something different. My dad ordered the Band of Brothers learn to play bolt action set, Knowing him it would never get built or painted so I took it apon myself to expand my painting portfolio and get some amazing historical miniatures under my belt. The plan was to shoot for right around tabletop standard and once I do a little more weathering and get the decals on I'm going to call that my tabletop +. As always feed back is both appreciated and encouraged. If you see something you like feel free to ask how I did it, I'm usually good at getting back to people. If you liked this and would like to see more work like it please feel free to follow me here or on my Facebook page facebook.com/TabletopGlory



    • By Marvin
      You know how I'm always asking for a deserty barbariany roguey elf wielding a spiked chain? This is what happens when you don't give it to me, sculptors and companies. I ruin your sculpts. In this case, Bobby Jackson's Irith, Deathseeker Hero.
       
      ~10 years ago, I created a character concept, a barbarian rogue assassin from a desert moon. Probably not that great an idea; whatever. I loved it. Didn't wind up getting to play him, but the name became my main Internet handle for a long time, and I always kept the concept in mind. This past winter I joined a game, decided he'd be a perfect fit, and made him anew. Bought a mini to mod to represent him at the table! But again didn't get to play him. Alas.
       
      But I had a mini for him this time. I'm not in love with the figure, but it seemed like a good one for converting. And it was close as I could get on the look. I guess. I'm pretty happy with how he turned out, honestly. I feel like I could've done a lot worse. I cut off the original's weapons. I used jewelry chain for the chain, a hacked-up jewelry bit bead thingy for the spike, and another jewelry bead thingy for the ball. Drilled out hands, wound up having to cut them, and closed them again over the chain. Pretty simple, pretty ghetto, but here we be. Right eye turned out better than the left, I thought. I had him finished a while ago, but I was waiting on a base. It's a desert base from Micro Arts Studio. Thought it fit the theme pretty well.
       







       
      Thanks for looking!
    • By Chaoswolf
      Sligg soldier I painted up a few days ago. The base is from Secret Weapon.Tabletop work as usual,I hope you like him.
       
      I'm trying to work on my pictures more; which set looks the better, the first three, or the last two?
       
      Front

      Back
       

      Showing the base a little better
       



       
    • By Pingo
      This is a fresh start for a thread I feel I knocked off kilter.  I feel it may be justified in that I've finally started actually painting the creature.
       
      This is Reaper's 14532: Aislinn, Shadow Tracker, a large werewolf (the base is a 40mm square) from the Koborlas faction in their Warlord game.  I had a request from a player for a werewolf who can shift genders and appear gender ambiguous, and this seemed a good place to start.  The sculpt is meant to be female, but it is lean and muscly and not over-bosomy.  I filed it down somewhat and off we go.
       
      ... I don't seem to have done my usual practice of documenting the priming (a light coat of thinned Titanium White and a wash of Burnt Umber on the creature only, leaving the base white for snow), so here is the first layer.  I decided to paint this one as a white wolf.  I've observed that "white" wolves are actually a creamy light brown, so that's how I've painted this one.  The color is mixed from Yellow (Iron) Oxide, Burnt Umber, a bit of Ultramarine Blue to tone down the brightness, and Titanium White.  It came out a sort of dull buff, a good blonde color.
       
      The color is laid on thin and translucent.  Where the Burnt Umber underneath shows the color shifts to a sort of bluish shadow.

       

       
      I indicated the nose, eyes, lips, and claws with Carbon Black.  I don't use pure black much, but I needed a little facial indication to work from.

       

       
      Had a little blue on my palette, so I swished in some snow shadows.  These are two mixes: Phthalo Blue with a tiny bit of Hansa Yellow Opaque and a great deal of Titanium White; and Ultramarine Blue and Titanium White.

    • By hdclearman
      I'm not sure how here reads Figure Painter Magazine, but for those interested, there is a nice write-up on ReaperCon 2016 in the current issue (#44).
       
      This issue also contains an interview with Marike Reimer.  Worth the read.
       
  • Who's Online   71 Members, 5 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)