Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Bonwirn

Warlord and the Sci-Fi theme of Reapercon 2015

15 posts in this topic

I am trying to get a head start on a theme game for Reapercon 2015 using the Warlord Rules and the RAGE system.

 

I think the "monsters" can translate fairly well for what I am thinking.  However, to use minis like the Nova Corp, who have ranged weaponry, can melee up close, etc...  How would you translate that or What datacards would you start with to not totally imbalance the game.

 

Issues I am seeing...  using soldiers with ranged weapons isn't as "hit or miss" as archery and spears.  The soldiers should hit (MAV) as frequently as knights in combat, not the 2s and 3s for ranged combat, I was thinking more like 4s and 5s...  but that would overpower them to have 4s and 5s for melee... or should those be reduced to 2s and 3s...

 

Spell usages... combined with technology, replaced by technology, or just not existant?

 

replaced means casters are RPG carrying folks with different types of grenades...

 

Healers are medics, but need to be within X" to help (versus a spell just needing LOS)?

 

 

Am I getting too bogged down in the mechanics?

 

What are your thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't have the depth of experience with Warlord 1.0 that some on here do, I think you have rediscovered the over-powered ranged combat that plagued said edition.

 

If you are going to bump up ranged combat stats, then I would suggest making everyone a ranged combatant.  I personally think The Other GameTM has some seriously ridiculous problems with super-science blaster folk running up to each other to hit them with swords.

 

I guess you could do a couple things like decking out your up-close-and-personal fighters with DR and heavy Defect bonuses (assuming you don't have too many Marksman SAs).

 

Bogged down in mechanics?  Pah!  If we don't want mechanics we can just play checkers.

 

=-Jake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also - I and one or two others are working on a quickplay buckets-o-d6 ruleset for a participation game at RCon 2015, using Chronoscope SF figures.  It's not RAGE, but I thought I'd throw that out there.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just choose which cards to use.  I'd go with some of the cards for the Elites with ranged attacks.  Just use those for your grunts.  It shouldn't bee too hard to rock out with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Castlebuilder and Reaper have already done the heavy lifting converting Warlord/RAGE into a ranged combat focused game called Cowboys and Gunslingers. I'd recommend grabbing the rules and Data Cards here (http://www.reapermini.com/Games/CowboysandGunslingers), and just tweaking them to suit your needs. Regarding game mechanics, for Convention games, the easier and speedier the better.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't have the depth of experience with Warlord 1.0 that some on here do, I think you have rediscovered the over-powered ranged combat that plagued said edition.

 

If you are going to bump up ranged combat stats, then I would suggest making everyone a ranged combatant.  I personally think The Other GameTM has some seriously ridiculous problems with super-science blaster folk running up to each other to hit them with swords.

 

I guess you could do a couple things like decking out your up-close-and-personal fighters with DR and heavy Defect bonuses (assuming you don't have too many Marksman SAs).

 

Bogged down in mechanics?  Pah!  If we don't want mechanics we can just play checkers.

 

=-Jake

It's ok, you can say 40k without the GW Inquisition showing up at your door.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also ask me to share the data cards I already have made up for Nova Corp, IMEF, and assorted other critters & characters.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comments in after **  to make them easier to spot


 


Issues I am seeing...  using soldiers with ranged weapons isn't as "hit or miss" as archery and spears.  The soldiers should hit (MAV) as frequently as knights in combat, not the 2s and 3s for ranged combat, I was thinking more like 4s and 5s...  but that would overpower them to have 4s and 5s for melee... or should those be reduced to 2s and 3s...


**Raising RAV is OK, if you have either Monsters with 5+ damage tracks, or if you have a TONS of terrain so most everyone can move from cover to cover.  You can also reduce DV so that things that survive the 'no man's land' of the range combat that they just walk through things in Melee a la Starship Troopers.   So things can balance out overall


 


Spell usages... combined with technology, replaced by technology, or just not existant?


replaced means casters are RPG carrying folks with different types of grenades...


**Some spells can be tech, but in an infinite universe should not spells be a thing?


 


Healers are medics, but need to be within X" to help (versus a spell just needing LOS)?


**Who is to say that healers don't have guns that fire hypodermic rounds filled with medical nanites.  CP then becomes RAV with the specific ballistics of these types of delivery systems


 


 


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am trying to get a head start on a theme game for Reapercon 2015 using the Warlord Rules and the RAGE system.

 

[ ... ]

 

Am I getting too bogged down in the mechanics?

 

What are your thoughts?

 

 

Also - I and one or two others are working on a quickplay buckets-o-d6 ruleset for a participation game at RCon 2015, using Chronoscope SF figures.  It's not RAGE, but I thought I'd throw that out there.

 

Looking forward to trying both. I would like to register some mild disappointment in advance if figures armed with lazer rifles / beam weapons are saddled with range bands. Just once I would like to see a tabletop game where the figures equipped with high-tech weapons can shoot to the ranges such things could really reach. (Or for that matter a .44 calibre rifle round...)

 

  • Winchester Rifle on a 4x4 foot table -?- 'short' range is 6 feet.
  • PhazarZap Rifle on a 4x4 foot table -?-  'short' range is 6 feet.

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

 

While you are correct about ranges, my counter argument is that accuracy decreases significantly once the shooter is put under stress.  I always got a kick out of the guys at the Police Range who bragged about being such great shots but fell apart if you made them do anything but stand still and aim.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

While you are correct about ranges, my counter argument is that accuracy decreases significantly once the shooter is put under stress.  I always got a kick out of the guys at the Police Range who bragged about being such great shots but fell apart if you made them do anything but stand still and aim.

 

Quite true.

 

But in a combat situation those guys will burn the rounds anyway.

 

So in a table-top game, particularly modern, contemporary, or sci-fi ... if the little gun toting minis are not blazing away on even a remote chance of hitting I find it ... disappointing.

 

It is the game mechanic that bugs me: the chance of hitting at that distance is very small ---therefore that distance is "out of range"--- and the rules wind up effectively declaring a bullet flies less distance than a BB. Needs a better mechanic.

_________________________________________________________

 

There is this --- with beam weapons sci-fi author Larry Niven posited this technique: "...Shoot, then aim..."

(Emit sustained laser, swing it onto target...)

 

Nobody really knows how beam weapons will work in practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out Tomorrow's War. Your range is the table.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It is the game mechanic that bugs me: the chance of hitting at that distance is very small ---therefore that distance is "out of range"--- and the rules wind up effectively declaring a bullet flies less distance than a BB. Needs a better mechanic.

 

 

This is why I like the ranged mechanic in Cowboys and Gunslingers. Nothing has a maximum range, you just take cumulative "to hit" penalties as the range increases. 

 

I think the problem with the mechanic you point out of the odds being so small that the target becomes "out of range" is due to the dice system of the game used. 40K uses a d6, therefore the lowest odds of hitting something becomes 16.6%. That's still pretty good odds. With RAGE's d10 system, that lowers to 10%. Still not too bad. If you really wanted an "unlimited" range mechanic, you might want to go to a d20 system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my game, ranged weapons are "table" in range, and I'm pondering how to differentiate pistols from rifles.

 

I want to finish up some of the other sections then I'll post a call for playtest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, just putting this in here: accuracy in real-life combat tends to be abysmal, BUT, Defiance Vital Ground can assign unlimited range to any weapon you like, you just have to stat it up as such. And pay for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By knarthex
      See you all soon in TX!
    • By knarthex
      So, The very first mini I pulled out of the BOGW when I got it, was a Malifaux mini....
      As soon as I saw it, I knew how I had to paint it!
      So I give you @Sylverthorne the Girlblin!







      Hope you like it!!!!!!
       
      George
       
      Abbreviated WIP here
      (Didn't have time to record everything with the need to get it done for Wednesday.....)
    • By Pegazus
      Hey, @ub3r_n3rd, here's the figure that I managed to finish. The top clear coat makes it a bit shiny, but I've got it under harsh lights.
       

       
      With the very zoomed in picture I'm not exactly happy with the shading on the right hand side where it transitions from light to dark in the middle fold, but that was vexing me for a long time. It's the way I want it to look, but I'm not sure everybody's eye will interpret the shape that I wanted to illustrate. There's also a woodgrain painted on the bow, but it is very subtle and doesn't look to show up here. I guess that should have been something a bit more stark.
       
      Really feel that she's missing an arrow in her hand, since she seems to want to be nocking an arrow, but there's nothing there. Need to work on my eyes for the next figure, but that's a common refrain.
    • By Thrym
      YAY!  Clearance items begotten from Game Kastle and I managed to find not one but TWO of the minis from my wishlist in their clearance!!  WOOOHOOO!
       
      HERALD OF BLOOD
      This golem or construct of the gnomes from deep within the world is brilliantly painted by Martin Jones in the Reaper Catalog:
       

      Painted by Martin Jones
       
      And while I didn't want his work to influence mine I will be doing at least two things the same:
       
      A.
      Glowing Runes and Eyes
       
      B.
      Not Stone Spikes
       
      I assembled this gentleman first with the idea of "full menacing pose" so both arms are over his head.
       
      And amusingly, without referencing the above image, I swapped his arms.
       
      So to start off, here he is Primed, Basecoated in Vallejo Game Color Yellow Olive and the Runes are in Vallejo Panzer Aces Stencil.
       

       
      GOAL!!!!
      On the base, is a piece of slate and green stuff to simulate cavern floor.  Two fallen or unused mine supports are behind him.
       
      What's next ... well, I think the final colors are going to be Purple / Black Granite with a Green under-color.
      The Runes will be a glowing Reaper Rach Red .
       
      The Spikes will be converted into Crystals.  Which might entail some blunting of the ends to get a more crystalline appearance. 
      These crystals will ultimately be Red/Purple or Purple/Green to fit the theme so far.
       
      ENJOY and Stay Tuned!
    • By Ironhammer
      Right, so I finally decided to do a WiP on this guy, mainly in the hopes to get some good feedback on the painting process.  This will be one of my Reapercon (in the Open category, being as it is a scratchbuild). 
       
      First off, some older pics going back a few months, showing where I started from.  I started by sculpting a few faces and picked one that I thought would do the job.  Then I built a basic armature, established a pose and then began fleshing it out.
       
      I'm afraid I didn't get any more WiP shots of the sculpting after this, so on to the finished figure (pre painting that is).
       
      Here is the final figure prior to painting, complete with scenic base.


       
      And because I really would like to show off all the work that went into it, here are a lot of detail shots of the various elements.  The discarded helmet was a little bit of a trick, as I wanted it to actually be hollow.  I dealt with it by sculpting the basic shape on the end of another tool, then carefully pulling it off and carving out the face plate and widening the rest of the interior.  The backpack and pistol frame were stacked sheet styrene, with added details in greenstuff and wire.  The base was just a couple of cutup corks with greenstuff textured over it.
       
      Next up is painting.  Digging around online for inspiration I came across this image, which is supposedly of a 1950s era US Navy pressure suit.  I liked the olive drab and beige combination (though I may skip the white helmet), and decided I would go with something similar, but with warmer colors. 
       

       
      The palette I wound up choosing for the basic flight suit is below.  For some reason the special edition colors have become some of my favorites.  Carnival Purple was a special edition paint for Reapercon '13 (I think), and has become one of my go to colors for shadowing, while Pumpkin Orange has become another one of my mainstays. 
       

       
      Here is the figure after the first round of painting.  I went in with the intention of giving the suit a much ruddier look that was the case in the prototype (hence the Pumpkin Orange), but tn the end the orange really dominated the palette (which doesn't really bother me, so long as the end result looks good), The figure was primarily bascoated with black primer, while the head was done in white.  I don't recall exactly how much time it took me to get from there to what you see below, but I think it was close to two hours or so.
       
      Whatcha' think so far?  I've always been better with a hobby knife than a paint brush, and this year I'm really anxious to up my game a bit.  Any and all input is welcome!
       

  • Who's Online   11 Members, 3 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)