Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Bonwirn

Warlord and the Sci-Fi theme of Reapercon 2015

15 posts in this topic

I am trying to get a head start on a theme game for Reapercon 2015 using the Warlord Rules and the RAGE system.

 

I think the "monsters" can translate fairly well for what I am thinking.  However, to use minis like the Nova Corp, who have ranged weaponry, can melee up close, etc...  How would you translate that or What datacards would you start with to not totally imbalance the game.

 

Issues I am seeing...  using soldiers with ranged weapons isn't as "hit or miss" as archery and spears.  The soldiers should hit (MAV) as frequently as knights in combat, not the 2s and 3s for ranged combat, I was thinking more like 4s and 5s...  but that would overpower them to have 4s and 5s for melee... or should those be reduced to 2s and 3s...

 

Spell usages... combined with technology, replaced by technology, or just not existant?

 

replaced means casters are RPG carrying folks with different types of grenades...

 

Healers are medics, but need to be within X" to help (versus a spell just needing LOS)?

 

 

Am I getting too bogged down in the mechanics?

 

What are your thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't have the depth of experience with Warlord 1.0 that some on here do, I think you have rediscovered the over-powered ranged combat that plagued said edition.

 

If you are going to bump up ranged combat stats, then I would suggest making everyone a ranged combatant.  I personally think The Other GameTM has some seriously ridiculous problems with super-science blaster folk running up to each other to hit them with swords.

 

I guess you could do a couple things like decking out your up-close-and-personal fighters with DR and heavy Defect bonuses (assuming you don't have too many Marksman SAs).

 

Bogged down in mechanics?  Pah!  If we don't want mechanics we can just play checkers.

 

=-Jake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also - I and one or two others are working on a quickplay buckets-o-d6 ruleset for a participation game at RCon 2015, using Chronoscope SF figures.  It's not RAGE, but I thought I'd throw that out there.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just choose which cards to use.  I'd go with some of the cards for the Elites with ranged attacks.  Just use those for your grunts.  It shouldn't bee too hard to rock out with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Castlebuilder and Reaper have already done the heavy lifting converting Warlord/RAGE into a ranged combat focused game called Cowboys and Gunslingers. I'd recommend grabbing the rules and Data Cards here (http://www.reapermini.com/Games/CowboysandGunslingers), and just tweaking them to suit your needs. Regarding game mechanics, for Convention games, the easier and speedier the better.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't have the depth of experience with Warlord 1.0 that some on here do, I think you have rediscovered the over-powered ranged combat that plagued said edition.

 

If you are going to bump up ranged combat stats, then I would suggest making everyone a ranged combatant.  I personally think The Other GameTM has some seriously ridiculous problems with super-science blaster folk running up to each other to hit them with swords.

 

I guess you could do a couple things like decking out your up-close-and-personal fighters with DR and heavy Defect bonuses (assuming you don't have too many Marksman SAs).

 

Bogged down in mechanics?  Pah!  If we don't want mechanics we can just play checkers.

 

=-Jake

It's ok, you can say 40k without the GW Inquisition showing up at your door.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also ask me to share the data cards I already have made up for Nova Corp, IMEF, and assorted other critters & characters.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comments in after **  to make them easier to spot


 


Issues I am seeing...  using soldiers with ranged weapons isn't as "hit or miss" as archery and spears.  The soldiers should hit (MAV) as frequently as knights in combat, not the 2s and 3s for ranged combat, I was thinking more like 4s and 5s...  but that would overpower them to have 4s and 5s for melee... or should those be reduced to 2s and 3s...


**Raising RAV is OK, if you have either Monsters with 5+ damage tracks, or if you have a TONS of terrain so most everyone can move from cover to cover.  You can also reduce DV so that things that survive the 'no man's land' of the range combat that they just walk through things in Melee a la Starship Troopers.   So things can balance out overall


 


Spell usages... combined with technology, replaced by technology, or just not existant?


replaced means casters are RPG carrying folks with different types of grenades...


**Some spells can be tech, but in an infinite universe should not spells be a thing?


 


Healers are medics, but need to be within X" to help (versus a spell just needing LOS)?


**Who is to say that healers don't have guns that fire hypodermic rounds filled with medical nanites.  CP then becomes RAV with the specific ballistics of these types of delivery systems


 


 


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am trying to get a head start on a theme game for Reapercon 2015 using the Warlord Rules and the RAGE system.

 

[ ... ]

 

Am I getting too bogged down in the mechanics?

 

What are your thoughts?

 

 

Also - I and one or two others are working on a quickplay buckets-o-d6 ruleset for a participation game at RCon 2015, using Chronoscope SF figures.  It's not RAGE, but I thought I'd throw that out there.

 

Looking forward to trying both. I would like to register some mild disappointment in advance if figures armed with lazer rifles / beam weapons are saddled with range bands. Just once I would like to see a tabletop game where the figures equipped with high-tech weapons can shoot to the ranges such things could really reach. (Or for that matter a .44 calibre rifle round...)

 

  • Winchester Rifle on a 4x4 foot table -?- 'short' range is 6 feet.
  • PhazarZap Rifle on a 4x4 foot table -?-  'short' range is 6 feet.

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

 

While you are correct about ranges, my counter argument is that accuracy decreases significantly once the shooter is put under stress.  I always got a kick out of the guys at the Police Range who bragged about being such great shots but fell apart if you made them do anything but stand still and aim.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 feet is considered to be a horizontal distance of 360 feet, terrain scaled accordingly, shooting ranges in scale with terrain...

 

Just once.

While you are correct about ranges, my counter argument is that accuracy decreases significantly once the shooter is put under stress.  I always got a kick out of the guys at the Police Range who bragged about being such great shots but fell apart if you made them do anything but stand still and aim.

 

Quite true.

 

But in a combat situation those guys will burn the rounds anyway.

 

So in a table-top game, particularly modern, contemporary, or sci-fi ... if the little gun toting minis are not blazing away on even a remote chance of hitting I find it ... disappointing.

 

It is the game mechanic that bugs me: the chance of hitting at that distance is very small ---therefore that distance is "out of range"--- and the rules wind up effectively declaring a bullet flies less distance than a BB. Needs a better mechanic.

_________________________________________________________

 

There is this --- with beam weapons sci-fi author Larry Niven posited this technique: "...Shoot, then aim..."

(Emit sustained laser, swing it onto target...)

 

Nobody really knows how beam weapons will work in practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out Tomorrow's War. Your range is the table.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It is the game mechanic that bugs me: the chance of hitting at that distance is very small ---therefore that distance is "out of range"--- and the rules wind up effectively declaring a bullet flies less distance than a BB. Needs a better mechanic.

 

 

This is why I like the ranged mechanic in Cowboys and Gunslingers. Nothing has a maximum range, you just take cumulative "to hit" penalties as the range increases. 

 

I think the problem with the mechanic you point out of the odds being so small that the target becomes "out of range" is due to the dice system of the game used. 40K uses a d6, therefore the lowest odds of hitting something becomes 16.6%. That's still pretty good odds. With RAGE's d10 system, that lowers to 10%. Still not too bad. If you really wanted an "unlimited" range mechanic, you might want to go to a d20 system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my game, ranged weapons are "table" in range, and I'm pondering how to differentiate pistols from rifles.

 

I want to finish up some of the other sections then I'll post a call for playtest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, just putting this in here: accuracy in real-life combat tends to be abysmal, BUT, Defiance Vital Ground can assign unlimited range to any weapon you like, you just have to stat it up as such. And pay for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Kuro Cleanbrush
      Well, since Ron has posted pictures of her on FB now, I suppose I'm free to share Mina with the world!
       
      She was a very fun miniature for me, though she provided a couple of challenges along the way.  First, I originally worried that her attire would look a little too dressy on top/ragged on bottom, but I hope that the striped pants (which are always quite enjoyable to paint) help tie her together and make her the right level of ragged-fancy all around (like a pirate is supposed to be!).  Second, believe it or not, this would appear to be one of the darkest skintones I have ever attempted, so I didn't have a tried-and-true recipe to fall back on.  Nonetheless, I think things turned out okay, though (with all skintones) I really need to push my use of different shades of blue, green, and etc. to really bring life into the shadows.  Better skintones have been something of a quest for me recently, and so I'll have to continue to practice, but each new miniature seems to be a step in the right direction! 
       

       
      I hope you like her!!!  And remember, even if you can't pick her up in person at ReaperCon, she should be available during the convention through Reaper's website!
       
      Thanks for looking! 
    • By Pegazus
      Hey all! Last year I did this via PM, and it was a PITA. So this year I will be doing it out in the open. So, those of you who were on the cards last year, or got a card last year know how the game works, so you can skip the next paragraph.
       
      What is Forumite Bingo? It's a convention game I came up with last year and was well received so I will do it again this year. The game is just like what a bingo game would be, but rather than calling out numbers to fill your card, you must go around and introduce yourself to members of the forum who are on your card. Say hi to them, and you can cross their box off. Once you've made "bingo", return to me for your Bingo ribbon. Blackout isn't required, but several people did it for the grins. And there's nothing to 'prove' you met those who you have said you have, just the honor system. You only punish yourself by cheating yourself out of meeting wonderful people.
       
      Last year there were more volunteers than spaces, so not every one was on every card, and hopefully there will be enough volunteers again this year. It made for a good variety. So, this thread is not for signing up to receive a card to play. This is a signup for people who are willing to be on a card. The cards will be freely handed out at the convention. Just come find me, and potentially my wife who may have my materials. Be aware, volunteering to be on the card will mean that complete strangers will be coming up to meet you, and they may not be actually signed up and be on this forum. That happened more often than I thought it would last year. If that makes you uncomfortable, then reconsider volunteering.
       
      So, a bit few ground rules:
       
      Last year I excluded all the Reaper peeps since they are all pretty accessible. The game's purpose is to meet the less visible and vocal. I will continue that. Sorry peeps, we love ya, but I feel that's best. The free square in the middle will be me, since everybody has to meet me to get the card it seems the fairest way. You must be going to ReaperCon to be on the card please! And if possible, the full Thursday to Saturday at least. It's unfair to those whose card you are on if you don't show, or are a Saturday only person. I will not exclude you if you are a Saturday only (or similar) limited attendee. However, people who have you on their cards will get to cross you off without meeting you if you aren't there when they need you for bingo. By replying with the information below, you are giving your permission to use the picture provided and your name provided, and to be inundated with people introducing themselves to you. Once I've printed the cards (much closer to the con than I want), they are set in stone. I can't remove people from the cards, and they're a bit pricy to just toss. Plans change, life happens, and if you become a no-show, you simply become a gimme square and are crossed off automatically by those who need your square. It already happened last year, and well, it will probably happen again. We'll just roll along in those cases. Signups will be open from now until October 1st. That gives me a mere two weeks to randomize the cards and have them printed on card stock. I'll get a mod to lock this thread on that date, and once the thread is locked, no more volunteers will be accepted. One does not need to be very active on these forums to be on the card, but it helps people to recognize you. But I will not turn away anybody that isn't very active if they really want to be on the card. If there's a question about any of these numbered questions, please quote the text since the numbering is automatic and I can't control it if there's an insertion. I will update these rules as questions and issues come up.  
      All ready to sign up? Good! Here's what you need to do. Reply to this thread with:
      The name you want to use. I prefer your forum handle, so people might have some idea of who you are. They can always write your real name across the square as a way of crossing you off. What picture you wish to use for your square. Again, I prefer your forum picture, but if you are someone who changes it often, I might grab one that isn't current so having you explicitly give me one helps. What days you will be at ReaperCon. I'm planning to put the days you are there on the square somehow, and this will help us know if your are there that day or not. I'm only using Thursday thru Sunday, with Wednesday as a simple bonus day.  
      I think that's it for now. See you all in a month!
    • By knarthex
      So...
      As the brain weasels have been keeping me from my painting for the last couple of months, time to get it in gear....
       
      So I am going to try and get this guy ready for con, so please point out errors etc...
      Face is SC75 Arabic Flesh, Basic Flesh, Golden Skin, with a 50% each intermediate steps
      Eyes are GW Scorched Brown, SC F&G Purity White, and GW Snot Green
      Hair MSP Blond Shadow
      Inner tunic,hat, and boots are SC F&G Decay Black
      Outer tunic is SC WF SS Camo Shadow, and Field Grey  50%
      Pants are GW Snakebite Leather






       
      So please point out issues that you see....
       
      Still early stages...
       
      Thanks!
      G
       
    • By Chaoswolf
      So, I got this pretty cool figure a few years ago at my first Reapercon.

       
      I don't think I've ever seen him painted up, so I figured I'd give it a shot, and I'll be bringing him to this year's 'con.
       
      The base on the figure was slightly miscast, so I removed it and attached the figure to an urban rubble base ('old factory' by Basicks).
       
      His pants are painted up in an WW2 German 'ambush pattern' camouflage scheme.
       
      Because I'm a glutton for punishment, I decided to try some freehand tattoos on him. I'm doing something vaguely reminiscent of the tribal tattoos that George Clooney's character had in From Dusk 'Till Dawn.  In the movie the tats were on his left arm; I'm doing them on the right 'cause there's more room there. I also added a word tattooed onto the fingers of his left hand.
       
      ....and that's where I'm stuck. I know I need to try to do something to make 'em look they're under the skin, not just painted on top of it, but I'm not sure what/how to do it...I tried what I thought was a light wash; that ended up looking terrible. I ended up repainting his arm, it was that bad. (On the plus side, I think the second version of the tats looks better.)
       
      So please let me know what you think, and any advice would be great;y appreciated.
       

       

       

       
       
       
       
    • By PinkCarnation
      Please help me with who was the 2016 Hall of Fame Inductee. The Reapercon link https://reapercon.com/halloffame is missing that and the Bios for Jason Wiebe (Gwydion Green) and Debbie Lewis (Dancin' Debbie) . Thanks for any help you can provide. BTW NOT trying to be hyper critical I know web design is terdious and upkeep is difficult the dropdown menu could use a link to the HALL OF FAME. If I am a pest or wrong please forgive me I am ACD and also just had eye surgery.
  • Who's Online   38 Members, 5 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)