TGP

Getting to Know Each Other = July Edition

821 posts in this topic

57 minutes ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

 

It mostly only annoys me when the fluff is inconsistent, either in respect to the rules or general narrative.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

 

I don't need the theme to be deep, but some themes tend to turn me off. 

 

For example, generally, sci-fi doesn't do much for me. Sci-fi is like an additional barrier to entry to liking a game for me, even if it's done well. In the world of board games, a pasted on fantasy theme on top of a good game is enough to work with for me. 

 

Certain things I barely care about fluff for - Kings of War, for example, has more fluff than I need, even though I was really into Warhammer fluff back in the day. I just find that with some games it's extraneous.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it serves a purpose to the game being played? I'm fine withit.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

 

I started down the Road to Madness as an historical gamer; SO the fluff was essential. When I got into fantasy the fluff was all new &, as such, interesting. Later I found the fluff restricting & progressively unimaginative.

I follow games without gaming now & most of the table top fluff is boring & contrived. Now I have my own little world to provide the background for my creations. It is a satisfying way of approaching the craft, at least for me.

8 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

 

Yes and No. The fluff, or "feel" of the setting/game/whathaveyou is what gets me interested. However, I don't necessarily devour all the fluff and fiction related to a given setting or game. In some cases, there's just too dang much to devour all of it. In others, the actual fiction (i.e. short stories, novellas, and novels) are just not that well written or edited. If the actual setting has appeal to it though, that is what matters. If the setting is uninspiring though, its a real long shot that I'll play in it.


Now, if its an RPG, as a GM, I will generally go with the flow of the given setting (assuming its not a homebrew world), but I have always made it clear to my players that just because the Monster Manual says that a particular critter has traits X, Y, and Z, doesn't mean that they will in my game should the need arise. They will; however, remain consistent as a general rule. Sure, you could have an unusually smart troll but if it is in fact, unusual that a troll is smart, I will let the players know (assuming proper skill checks, etc.). Mostly I do this to give myself room for narrative, and sometimes I will do this to avoid metagaming.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends.

 

Does the game present itself as a rules set that doesn't need the fluff to operate?

 

Kings of War, for example, doesn't need the fluff.  I can create a decent game by using the existing rules to create almost any army I want.  So my undead/vampire army has a contingent of humans who are the human-serfs of their vampire lords.  I can use a regiment of them and get a small unit of gargoyles that plays well with what I have for my Warlord Necropolis army (at least, I think those are the units, as I don't have the books in front of me).  So adding lots of fluff there hinders my enjoyment of the game.  Luckily, Mantic doesn't push the fluff as much as GW does.

 

Warhammer, though, was annoying to me because it was harder for me to distance the army from the fluff.

 

Warhammer 40K works with the fluff.

 

Frostgrave has, in my opinion, the best balance, in that it's completely in the background.  You don't need it to enjoy the game (I don't want to remake my terrain to winter-and-ice themes, so I don't worry about it).  But the snippets of fiction included in the book provide a great atmosphere for a magic-heavy wargame (I love the idea of icicle-mosquitoes!).

 

Dungeons & Dragons is a perfectly fine game without fluff. The Forgotten Realms annoyed me, because the world was deemed as important as the characters' decisions.  It never seemed like a backdrop as much as it should..  As an example, the "White Box" rules have been adopted for a WW2 game as well as a science fiction game, where the rules are tweaked to reflect a different world-premise, but fluff isn't necessary for the game to function.

 

The Warmachine RPG (which I haven't played) would probably fall under "it's perfectly fine" because you need the world fluff to understand why there are giant stompy robots and mech-wizards.

 

 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

I enjoy "fluff," especially good stories and world building.

 

Good fluff is important to games tied to specific settings since it helps you get in the right mindset.  For example, in futuristic RPGs (for example, Shadowrun and Eclipse Phase), the progress of technology has changed how things are done and the fluff can help show this.  This is especially important for games set in the far future, either time-wise or progress-wise (like Eclipse Phase).  For "non-standard" fantasy settings (for example, Exalted or Legend of the Five Rings), the fluff helps show how different the setting is and what to expect as a player or GM.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

It used to be that I very much cared. Now it's merely inspiration, and I'm equally happy to toss it as keep it. 

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the game.

 

In Frostgrave, the fluff is mostly, "It's cold", with a few quotes for flavor. Has almost no effect on play and it's fun when it's well written and ignorable when it's not.

 

In original Traveller, the fluff (for the basic books) is limited to "there are nobles and a Traveller's Aid Society". Again, almost entirely ignorable.

 

In original RuneQuest, the fluff is virtually impossible to remove from the game (though RQ3 tried really hard), and when you do remove it, the remainder is very bland and uninteresting.

 

In 7th Sea, the fluff is hard to remove and aggressively stupid, so it gets in the way significantly.

 

In Hero System and GURPS, it's essentially non-existent unless you pick up one of their world books.

 

In BattleTech/MechWarrior, there are technical "advances" that make no sense baked into the system. If you don't want that, it's not the game for you.

 

And so on.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends if the fluff serves a purpose.  Or more specifically, if it serves my purpose.

 

 

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I often like fluff. I read the books in Skyrim and Dragon Age. I used to do all the side quests in WoW. Some games don't need fluff. Some games benefit from it. 

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

In an RPG, fluff is very important. It brings life into the world at hand and makes it more immersive, and has given me inspiration when I've made characters. It complements the crunch of the rules, and has made me choose feats that are not as optimal, just because those particular ones were more thematically appropriate for my character.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7/18: I like a well-crafted story to explain what I'm doing; otherwise it's just a random number generator with a fancy skin over the top of it.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

I love it. I especially love the fluff for Earthdawn, my favorite RPG. Earthdawn was created by people who wanted there to be reasons for all the common tropes in RPGs (like dungeons full of traps, treasure, and monsters) and they use the fluff to reinforce the mechanics. It also means that things like particular magic abilities, Classes, even Levels, all have gameverse terms that characters can use to talk about themselves, thus helping people stay in character when they're conversing.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

3 hours ago, TGP said:

Question for July 18: Is gameverse "fluff" important to you, an irrelevancy, or does it annoy and irritate?

 

(If the answer varies by game do elaborate...)

 

Yes, it is important for me.

 

Strangely, it is more important to me for a war game than for an RPG, because, if I really like a set of mechanics for a particular genre, I can construct my own fluff to match. (This applies most to Hero / FATE / GURPS / etc.)

 

The degree to which fluff and world building matters to me has recently be brought home by Mantic's "Kings of War". Some of the players in my local gaming group are really into it, but, however much I want to play with them, I just bounce off the game, and I think it has to do with how thin, and generic, the world feels to me. (I am aware that this is a subjective measure.)

 

ETA:

Clearly my thoughts on KoW are not popular in this thread. ::D:

Edited by klarg1
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Ludo
      I made a SNAFU and double booked myself for the Paint by Die Roll. The great kaiju has used his powers of internet and corrected it. However the Friday event had to be canceled. My apologies to everyone who was so kind to preregister. We have scheduled 2 new Paint by Die Roll events, One Thursday and one Saturday. We also added Survival Speed Paints after dinner every night. They are on the schedule and can be reserved. Again my apologies for messing up people's schedules!
       
      ~Ludo
    • By TGP
      Step 0 
       

      Penny ^ ...New model in blister. ^
       
      This guy is big enough to take up the footprint of four infantry skeletons. The penny is 19mm diameter. The plan is to give the figure a 40mm square, equivalent to four 20x20 bases arranged in a square.
       
      He will count as four members of the unit he'll be assigned to. 
    • By Pegazus
      Hey all! Last year I did this via PM, and it was a PITA. So this year I will be doing it out in the open. So, those of you who were on the cards last year, or got a card last year know how the game works, so you can skip the next paragraph.
       
      What is Forumite Bingo? It's a convention game I came up with last year and was well received so I will do it again this year. The game is just like what a bingo game would be, but rather than calling out numbers to fill your card, you must go around and introduce yourself to members of the forum who are on your card. Say hi to them, and you can cross their box off. Once you've made "bingo", return to me for your Bingo ribbon. Blackout isn't required, but several people did it for the grins. And there's nothing to 'prove' you met those who you have said you have, just the honor system. You only punish yourself by cheating yourself out of meeting wonderful people.
       
      Last year there were more volunteers than spaces, so not every one was on every card, and hopefully there will be enough volunteers again this year. It made for a good variety. So, this thread is not for signing up to receive a card to play. This is a signup for people who are willing to be on a card. The cards will be freely handed out at the convention. Just come find me, and potentially my wife who may have my materials. Be aware, volunteering to be on the card will mean that complete strangers will be coming up to meet you, and they may not be actually signed up and be on this forum. That happened more often than I thought it would last year. If that makes you uncomfortable, then reconsider volunteering.
       
      So, a bit few ground rules:
       
      Last year I excluded all the Reaper peeps since they are all pretty accessible. The game's purpose is to meet the less visible and vocal. I will continue that. Sorry peeps, we love ya, but I feel that's best. The free square in the middle will be me, since everybody has to meet me to get the card it seems the fairest way. You must be going to ReaperCon to be on the card please! And if possible, the full Thursday to Saturday at least. It's unfair to those whose card you are on if you don't show, or are a Saturday only person. I will not exclude you if you are a Saturday only (or similar) limited attendee. However, people who have you on their cards will get to cross you off without meeting you if you aren't there when they need you for bingo. By replying with the information below, you are giving your permission to use the picture provided and your name provided, and to be inundated with people introducing themselves to you. Once I've printed the cards (much closer to the con than I want), they are set in stone. I can't remove people from the cards, and they're a bit pricy to just toss. Plans change, life happens, and if you become a no-show, you simply become a gimme square and are crossed off automatically by those who need your square. It already happened last year, and well, it will probably happen again. We'll just roll along in those cases. Signups will be open from now until October 1st. That gives me a mere two weeks to randomize the cards and have them printed on card stock. I'll get a mod to lock this thread on that date, and once the thread is locked, no more volunteers will be accepted. One does not need to be very active on these forums to be on the card, but it helps people to recognize you. But I will not turn away anybody that isn't very active if they really want to be on the card. If there's a question about any of these numbered questions, please quote the text since the numbering is automatic and I can't control it if there's an insertion. I will update these rules as questions and issues come up.  
      All ready to sign up? Good! Here's what you need to do. Reply to this thread with:
      The name you want to use. I prefer your forum handle, so people might have some idea of who you are. They can always write your real name across the square as a way of crossing you off. What picture you wish to use for your square. Again, I prefer your forum picture, but if you are someone who changes it often, I might grab one that isn't current so having you explicitly give me one helps. What days you will be at ReaperCon. I'm planning to put the days you are there on the square somehow, and this will help us know if your are there that day or not. I'm only using Thursday thru Sunday, with Wednesday as a simple bonus day.  
      I think that's it for now. See you all in a month!
    • By Pingo
      So I was at the World Model Expo in Chicago last weekend, meeting Corporea and a whole bunch of Reaperites and ogling some of the finest miniatures painting and dioramas the world has to offer (the PA system requested fluent translators at a number of points).
       
      I took some pictures. Normally I've been putting up galleries on Photobucket, but they turned evil quite recently, so I'm attempting to put some up here to share.
       
      Anyhow, much of the show was historical miniatures, a category pretty new to me, and almost everything was much larger scale than the 28mm I'm used to. 
       
      As for the vendors, I regret to say that while for the larger figures the men were young, old, noble, peasant, ugly, handsome, heroic, villainous, commonplace, extraordinary, leaders, followers, white, black, Asian, Elvish, Orcish, cowboys, Vikings, soldiers, and fops; there were far fewer women figures and they were overwhelmingly pin-ups.
       
      Not that I have anything against pin-ups, per se.  I just prefer painting other things.
       
      I did pick up one very nice 54mm armored woman to give a try, only to discover Kuro Cleanbrush had done the same with the same model months ago. Good taste, Kuro!
       
      ( @Liverpuncher also put up a thread for his World Expo photos here.)
       
      Here's a couple of @Wren's pieces, including my own rough approximation of 3D photography: cross your eyes and it's 3-D!
       

       

       
    • By TGP
      Pendrake's 2017 Art Thread


      Contents
       
      Image 1: Wizard Out For A Stroll
      (On a Trilithon)
       
      Image 2: Terrano-dactyl Thing
      (On Bowling Night)
       
      Image 3: The Terradon From Image 2
      (colorized and captioned)
       
      Image 4: The Obsidian Axe
      (Illustration from a short story)
       
      Image 5: Runes, Tree, Stone
      (experimentation)
       
      Image 6: A Map
       
      & Index Links
      Previous Art Thread
       
       
       
      First picture is in the second post. 
  • Who's Online   29 Members, 1 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)