Jump to content

knarthex

What would YOU like to see taught next year

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Cyradis said:

 

Could a few people/judges deliberately paint to certain standards, for the sake of demonstrating negatives? That way you aren't using pieces that had the goal of "being the best" but came up short. 

 

It’s surprisingly difficult for competent artists to produce deliberately amateurish works.

 

I have seen professional art designers attempt to imitate childish drawings for advertisements, for example. They never seem to make the right kind of mistakes, and the art always looks subtly off.

 

Likewise, when good artists try to emulate what they see (or think they see) wrong in other art, it often results in little more than clumsy parody and mockery, be it of romance novel covers, comic books, the Impressionists, or so forth.

 

This might work best if the teachers hang onto their own personal misfires as examples.

 

6 hours ago, Wren said:

Pictures being publicly available doesn't mean that we'd feel comfortable doing public critiques of the work without the knowledge/permission of the artists. I've faced this same problem coming up with examples for classes sometimes. I'll occasionally pass around pictures of work by other artists in a positive context, but reserve the here's what sucks don't do it kind of information for reviews of my own work only.

 

Wow, that’s a fraught area.

 

I have sometimes participated in blogs and panels at conventions that focus on problems in genre book cover art, to partly educational but also humorous effect.

 

It’s a grey area. My personal take on it has always been to: 1, Only focus on professional publications; 2, Make it clear that even the best of artists can have a bad day; and 3, Make it equally clear that books are still loved even when saddled with awful cover art (with a blue ribbon mention for poor Ursula LeGuin’s “Earthsea” books, which seem to have had an unusually high number of different unfortunate covers).

 

It does help a lot that everyone present is presumed to love the genre in question and be affectionately aware of its flaws, warts and all.

 

It’s very difficult to hold third-party work up as bad examples, especially work made for personal enjoyment which has not been deliberately placed in public explicitly to be judged, without coming across as meanspirited. 

 

 

Edited by Pingo
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to the points Pingo raised (which are very interesting and many I hadn't thought about), the problem with some of us trying to do some work badly is that we barely have time to do the work we're supposed to be doing well. ;-> With deadlines and needing to do a certain amount of work to pay bills and whatnot, a lot of people who teach classes aren't going to have the luxury of time that would require.

I did find going back through my past work looking for examples of things I didn't do so well pretty fruitful, so possibly that's something we could look at to supply material. The main issue there can be that the photography of the past has as many issues as the painting of the past. ;->

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I suggested older projects that had been submitted, I was thinking of the 2 that I have entered in the last 2 years...

 

Now I realize everyone is different, but I went and asked the judges why I received the gradings I got, and I would not be adverse to my projects being discussed, as I learned why I got what I did, and that information would be useful for others...

 

Also, if I was asked to bring my Not Perfect, But Acceptable diorama from 2016, for their use as a teaching tool in a composition / diorame class, I would be happy to do so, provided that I had the space in my mini case...

My Goblin in Cougar Town was give to the subject, so getting it back to Con is problematic...

I would also be happy to discuss what I learned from each peice...

Provided that I wasn't in class myself, etc...

 

I also think that the nature of people on these forums would let them be glad to have their work used as an example, especially if they were given a write up about what they did right, and what they did wrong...

But that may just be me....

 

also: From the competition rules...

Other Rules

#4

By submitting an entry you agree to allow the model to be photographed by Reaper Miniatures, ReaperCon, Hobby-Q, Master Series Paint or Master Series Paint Open for use in ads, promotions, and galleries.

I would think that this would allow the instructors to use the photos..

 

I also grant any and all Instructors at ReaperCon to use pics of minis that I have entered in any MSP Painting contest to use said pics as referefnce materials for classes taught at ReaperCon...

 

George Lukach

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually... if not having suitable pieces to critique in such a class was an issue ... suggest that participants bring pieces /to/ critique? With the likely spread of skill levels, you would have a good chance of getting sufficient pieces, and people willing to hear what needs to be improved.

I have lots of possibilities, and would likely have more by next Reapercon, assuming I was going, and it's a class I would be interested in taking, if it was offered.

 

Is a thought, anyway.

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/8/2017 at 1:35 PM, Wren said:

In addition to the points Pingo raised (which are very interesting and many I hadn't thought about), the problem with some of us trying to do some work badly is that we barely have time to do the work we're supposed to be doing well. ;-> With deadlines and needing to do a certain amount of work to pay bills and whatnot, a lot of people who teach classes aren't going to have the luxury of time that would require.

I did find going back through my past work looking for examples of things I didn't do so well pretty fruitful, so possibly that's something we could look at to supply material. The main issue there can be that the photography of the past has as many issues as the painting of the past. ;->

 

If you'd be willing to do the class, I'd be willing to supply the photos and minis to critique.  I have most of the minis I have ever painted going back to my dry-brush days all the way up to my present level.  All of it would be at your disposal, both photos and actual minis (since I drive down bringing a suitcase of minis is not an issue).

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One issue with this type of class is that you are only getting the opinion of a single judge. ReaperCon is judged with a panel of three judges and we all tend to look at different things. Many times we are in complete agreement but in other cases we can be quite split in our opinions. A class taught by Wren will only feature Wren's opinions, of course those are excellent opinions, but you are only going to get a look at 1/3 of your potential score in the competition.  Those other two opinions is why a gold medal winner will receive two 4s and a 3 (11 points) instead of every gold medal winner receiving three 4s. Or what the difference is between a low silver (8 points, typically two 3s and a 2) and a high silver (10 points, typically two 3s and a 4).

Edited by Heisler
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/21/2017 at 3:02 PM, Heisler said:

One issue with this type of class is that you are only getting the opinion of a single judge. ReaperCon is judged with a panel of three judges and we all tend to look at different things. Many times we are in complete agreement but in other cases we can be quite split in our opinions. A class taught by Wren will only feature Wren's opinions, of course those are excellent opinions, but you are only going to get a look at 1/3 of your potential score in the competition.  Those other two opinions is why a gold medal winner will receive two 4s and a 3 (11 points) instead of every gold medal winner receiving three 4s. Or what the difference is between a low silver (8 points, typically two 3s and a 2) and a high silver (10 points, typically two 3s and a 4).

 

I think my original idea was that it be a panel discussion taught by 3 judges.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be super cool if Reaper could get Jeremie Bonamant Teboul to come teach again.  His classes were some of the most enlightening classes as he goes about painting quite different.  Also the classes he taught were pretty advanced as far as technique and theory which is a nice option for folks who have been to a few Reapercons before.  Continental painting seems to approach things in a different way.   

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/24/2017 at 2:53 PM, Mnemonic said:

... Another idea is to offer a few more instances of the most popular classes if possible. Hopefully the data is available someplace, but if a class sold out 20 minutes after registration opened then that is what I'm targeting. I'm sure there are many that would appreciate the added flexibility of taking a highly desired class in 2 or 3 possible timeslots.

 

Amen.  Sold out in 20 minutes?   How about less than 10 seconds.

 

At the risk of stepping on virtual toes, I detect a note of classupsmanship.  I have heard, to paraphrase, "I got so and so's class, and they are so great, and we are personal friends, and it is so hard to get, and it is the bestest ever there was, and people have told me how they envy me, and I took it last year, too."  Have the same class offered twice or thrice would go a long way to addressing that phenomenon.  Especially for folks who would really like to learn the technique from a respected artist.

 

The issue, I think, is whether an instructor is going to sign up for teaching some of these incredibly popular classes.  Some will and, I venture, some won't.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the OP.

 

Hands.  Feet.  Arms.  Legs.  Butts.  And such.

 

There are always face and eyes and skin classes.  I have taken and will continue to take them.  But, thanks to a particularly good class last year, we were encouraged to put down the brush and mini and look at art.  Lots of art.  Intently. 

 

I noticed that a hand can become a whole complex project in itself.  And that a really well done hand ups the level of the entire mini.  Then I noted that feet can do the same.  It seems to me that improvement in skin covered areas -- other than the face --  would help me quite a lot.  It is more than just highlights and shadows; it is how you look at different parts of the body and how you can represent them in mini scale.

 

I'd take those classes.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Highlander said:

To the OP.

 

Hands.  Feet.  Arms.  Legs.  Butts.  And such.

 

There are always face and eyes and skin classes.  I have taken and will continue to take them.  But, thanks to a particularly good class last year, we were encouraged to put down the brush and mini and look at art.  Lots of art.  Intently. 

 

I noticed that a hand can become a whole complex project in itself.  And that a really well done hand ups the level of the entire mini.  Then I noted that feet can do the same.  It seems to me that improvement in skin covered areas -- other than the face --  would help me quite a lot.  It is more than just highlights and shadows; it is how you look at different parts of the body and how you can represent them in mini scale.

 

I'd take those classes.

 

Well now, these are a great idea. Apart from my usual medieval and occasional steampunk and sci-fi subjects, I like painting pinup girls. I learned hair and makeup on my own, but I think a class targeting these would fill rather quickly and would be a great follow-on to Jess'  'Painting Hot Chicks' class. Geez, redheads' hair and makeup could be its own class...

 

Glen

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about knees.  There is some interesting anatomy around the knee.  If represented well at mini scale, it really adds to the result.  Even if the sculpture does not provide the contours of the anatomy, it can be represented in paint.  The same goes for calves, thighs, forearms, wrists, upper arms, shoulders, backs, butts, necks ... well you get the idea.

 

I just don't know how to do it.

 

Maybe a basic anatomy for minis class.  Hands-on.  I can get endless anatomy information from books and the internet; I just haven't been able to transfer it to a mini.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Highlander, et al: look for book entitled 'Drawing the Head and Figure' by Jack Hamm. It pops up in used book stores on a regular basis and is likely available on line as well (think Amazon). It dates back to 50s/60s (and the clothing and hair styles demonstrate this), but it's an excellent anatomical references that shows how to render facial features and body parts, but also what bone, muscle, and tendon groups protrude and/or recede in any given position. I use it when painting (especially flats which often lack such details). If nothing else it gives you an idea of where to put a shadow or highlight even if the sculptor neglected to provide a reason for it.

 

Glen

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Heisler
      Okay, we do have some manufacturer awards for the Reaper Con 2018 Painting Competition. This is what I know so far:
      Dark Sword: 
      Dark Sword Diorama Category:

      $150 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + $100 Cash + Trophy for best overall Dark Sword Diorama
      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Dark Sword Diorama
        
      Dark Sword Single Miniature Category:

      $150 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + $100 Cash + Trophy for best overall Dark Sword Single Miniature
      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Dark Sword Single Miniature
       
      Dark Sword Critter Kingdoms Anthropomorphic Animals Open Category:
      Can be either a single miniature or a diorama - simply carving out a separate category for our Critter Kingdoms minis.
      $150 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + $100 Cash + Trophy for best overall Dark Sword Critter Kingdoms
      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Dark Sword Critter Kingdoms
       
      Dark Sword Young Painter Category (Age 13 and under):
      Can be either a single miniature or a diorama - simply carving out a separate category for our young painters.

      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for best overall Dark Sword Young Painter
      $50 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Dark Sword Young Painter
       
      The Dark Sword Miniatures Manufacturer Awards are open to all painters. To be eligible for the prize support listed, the entries must be new entries, never before posted online or entered into any other painting competitions. In addition, no entries can be commissions from Dark Sword Miniatures for painted studio models. This means Dark Sword studio painters can enter if they so desire, but their entries must be brand new creations not commissioned from Dark Sword and must also adhere to the eligibility requirements above.
       
      Kabuki - 300 Euro Prize for the best Kabuki Miniature, regardless of category, in the painting competition. We are looking for a way to involve Rodolfo in the judging this year.
       
      Bombshell Miniatures
      Bombshell Miniatures presents the 2018 Golden Maelee Awards. This is a Sponsored Award section of the annual Reaper Master Series Open Painting Contest. Entries will be awarded 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place Maelee trophies.
       
      Entries will need to feature at least one or more Bombshell Miniatures as the prominent subject. This can be anything from Babes, Sidekicks, Kritterkins, to robots, or busts. Each entry will be judged on its own merit of painting execution, presentation, and skill.

      Entries from artists who have been professionally commissioned by Bombshell Miniatures are ineligible.
       
      Scale 75
      Best Scale 75 75MM or Bust
               $50.00 Coupon to our web store. 
       
      Best Smog Rider (CHIBI)
               $50.00 Coupon to our web store.
       
      Bet Scale 75 piece overall piece by a junior
               Smog Rider Starter set.
       
      Talon Games

      Best Individual CAV Model: Any single-model figure.

      Best CAV "Squad": This category allows for multiple models (minimum four
      models) as part of a cohesive squad.

      Best CAV Diorama: This category covers models with a scenic base where the
      entry is telling a story to the viewer and may include multiple models.

      Each category winner will receive a $100 Talon Games Gift Certificate and a
      Trophy.
       
      This first post in the thread will be updated with other manufacturers as we receive them.
    • By Aard_Rinn
      So, how does one go about finding folks who are looking to split a room for the con? I'm gonna be able to go this year, and the forum description said this is the place to do it, but I dont see a relevant thread. Let me know if there's a better place, I guess?
       
      While it wouldnt be the first con I've spent sleeping in the bushes outside the convention center, Texas sounds hotter than CT, so I am currently looking to share, if anyone has a free corner they're looking to fill. So, let me know and we can talk money, I guess? Bonus points if you're flying in and we can carpool to and from together - I pack light and ship well! :)
    • By knarthex
      So as a lot of folks around these here electronic parts know, I have barely hobbied since ReaperCon, due to brain weasel infestation...
      So for the past few days, I have tried to ease my way back in by working on 'risers' for my display case...
      These are chunks of blue insulation foam, cut to fit on my table saw (what a mess it makes!)
      Then sprayed Grey with Stynylrez primer through my airbrush.
       
      Overall case:

      Started life as the 'wings' of an entertainment center, and I added the LED lights scavenged from work...
      Left side is still in progress... (Top to bottom)



      A lonely DDS2
      a bare section that I sprayed the foam for tonight (The ex suggested that I put figures with a special value to me in it, old characters and such, likely, exchanges and gifts will end up in there as well, and the first 25mm mini that I ever painted. Rest will be underground critters and whatever else I can cram in there to get them off my bookcases....)
      Frostgrave terrain and warbands...
       
      Right side:



      Top is Demons and devils, Undead and pillars, and some of my medal wining Reapercon stuff
      Middle is some bigger things...
      Bottom is Giants and wilderness type critters....
       
      Thanks for taking a peek!
      G
    • By knarthex
      An Australian documentary about the Bristol Beaufighter serving in the South West Pacific during WWII...
       
      Interesting for an American to see something like this, as most documentaries I see are either American, or British....
       
       
    • By knarthex
      Hey folks looking for some advice on a project I am hoping to accomplish for Reapercon '18...
       
      It won't let me quote in the 1st post, so the next will have the links...
       
      george
       
      WIP here
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)

×