Jump to content
Dr.Bedlam

Intellectual Property Rights and Star Trek

Recommended Posts

I have a question for the group mind, and I'm tossin' it out HERE because this board is a congenial bunch and perhaps geeky enough that someone might have a clue as to the answers I'm lookin' for. But it's a COMPLICATED question, and requires some background.

Awright, Star Wars. SW is owned by Lucasfilm, outright. No one owns any PIECES of it. And Lucasfilm is owned by Disney, so Disney's who you ask if you want to make a SW TV show, movie, theme park, candy treat, garment, or toy product. Period. One stop shopping. Perhaps Disney's licensing department has a special Star Wars division, but that's about it as far as divisions go.

Now, The Walking Dead is a little different. Anything based on the TV show has to go through AMC, the TV cable channel that produces the show. However, there is an entirely separate licensing division based on the comic book that the TV show was lifted from. Hence, you want to make a Daryl Dixon action figure, or use the likeness of Andrew "Rick" Lincoln, you go through AMC... but you could make a TWC miniatures game based on the likenesses of the comic characters by simply contacting rights owner and TWC creator Robert Kirkman. But there's TWO different ways to go.

...which brings us to The Avengers/Marvel. The Marvel Cinematic Universe... that is, The Avengers, Hulk, Thor, and Captain America... is OWNED by Marvel Comics, which is owned by Disney, who made the movies. However, the Fantastic Four are owned by Marvel/Disney, but 20th Century Fox has the movie rights, and made the movies, while Sony has the movie rights to Spider-Man, and I'm STILL trying to figure out who-all has the rights to X-Men.

All the CHARACTERS are owned by Marvel, but the MOVIES and MOVIE RIGHTS are tied up nine ways from Sunday by different companies, to the point where getting Spider-Man for the last Avengers flick was considered a major achievement. And SOME of these people are JERKS about it; the first Fantastic Four movie was literally made solely to keep the movie rights, and was never intended to be released, and when the rightsholders wouldn't sell back or even lease the rights back to Disney, Marvel cancelled the FF comic in retaliation... despite it having been in print continuously since 1963.

But I'm digressing; this is piled too deep as it is. So back to my question: I'm thinkin' about Star Trek.

Been on a bit of a kick lately; bought the Modiphius minis for the Next Gen bridge crew, and have begun acquiring the HeroClix minis of the original series. And I have been in several discussions about the new Star Trek TV series, about which I have mixed feelings, particularly about the Klingons, who for some reason still speak tlhIngan Hol, straight out of Okrand's dictionary, but in no way resemble any Klingons ever seen on TV or movies previously, as well as having some weird new cultural traits.

I do not care for this. I want the Next Gen Klingons back. But the show is what it is, and some like it and some don't, and, well, we'll always have Qo'Nos, right?

But then someone on Facebook was tellin' me, "Dude, it's because the people makin' this new show don't have the rights to the old style Klingons."

I said, "Hah? It's Paramount. Paramount Pictures bought the rights from Desilu Studios, back in the day. How can they not have the rights to their own show?"

"Naw, dude, Paramount split from Viacom, and now they both have different rights to different parts of Star Trek, dude. That's why Shatner's Captain Kirk was born in Iowa but grew up on space colonies, but Chris Pine's Captain Kirk grew up on Earth and stole classic cars. That's why the new Klingons are bald and blue and fly around in giant Christmas ornaments, dude -- they had to create NEW Klingons, because the OTHER company has the rights to the Michael Dorn Klingons."

"................do WHA?"

So I did some research. Then I stopped, because my head hurt. Near as I can tell, boiled down, Viacom has SOME of the Star Trek IP rights... and Paramount has some OTHER Star Trek IP rights... but as far as I could tell, it was largely a matter of who could make TV shows as opposed to who could make and distribute movies. And if Klingons are a bone of contention, why are there Vulcans in all the new iterations?

Are Klingons an issue of property rights, or did someone just say, "Naw, I think Klingons should be bald and blue now, for no apparent reason, other than that I am a Hollywood Big Shot, and I Say So,"?

And what about the merch rights?

Can anyone out there shine some light on this?


 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ST:TNG Klingons first appeared in ST:TMP, so the folks making the movies do in fact have the right to use that version. As far as the differences in story, the writers and producers of the new movies felt too constrained by the existing story lines and history, so wiped the slate clean and blew up Vulcan to make sure they couldn't go back.

 

The Kzinti are an invention of Larry Nivan, who wrote them into an episode of ST:TAS as well his own Known Space stories.

 

Star Fleet Battles is based on a license that includes ST:TOS and ST:TAS and so includes the Kzinti, but not any of the movies.

 

The main continuity does not include ST:TAS.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doc Piske is pretty much spot on. The only episode of TAS anyone considers remotely canon is "Yesteryear," which is a long flashback to Spock's childhood on Vulcan, in which his brother Sybok and his human foster sister are conspicuously absent, as a tribute to how much stupid a few executives can kick out when you unleash them on a beloved canon and their first instinct is to crap on it so they like the flavor better.

The more reading I do online, the less convinced I am that rights have anything to do with it. After sifting several interviews with the showrunners, I find myself thinking about a thing I was once told by a TV writer.

"What you WANT is to hire a writer who wrote a script for your show. In the script, all your characters have something interesting to do, because the actors like that, and it has a great story, because the audience likes that, and it happens on the sets that already exist, because the networks like that, and it's totally filmable and excellent."

What you too often GET is a writer who wrote a script for your show in which one or more NEW characters show up, and they have interesting things to do while YOUR characters mostly sit and watch them and react to them, and you would have to hire new actors to play these characters, and likely they'll be doing things in new locations you don't have sets for, and you have to tell the writer to go and write a script that will work for YOUR show and characters, and not THEIRS."


Amusingly, Larry Niven and "The Soft Weapon" is a prime example, considering it's the same as his short story but with Star Trek people plugged in instead of his heroes. The kzinti attack their shuttle, kidnap them, our heroes outsmart them, and we head back to the status quo. The kzinti are never heard from again. It worked because, hey, Larry Niven's name in the credits looked good, they already had voice actors, and with an animated show, you don't worry about sets and locations and such. A similar situation ensued with "The City On The Edge Of Forever," one of TOS' most popular episodes; everyone agreed it was an awesome story, but that it wasn't really Star Trek, until it underwent a great many rewrites.

So, on TOS, someone came up with Klingons. They were basically a stand in for Cold War Russians, and due to lack of budget, they wore Mongol makeup. Space Barbarians!

Then, on TMP, due to wild executive interference and big budget, they had dinosaur ridges on their heads and new uniforms. And no one said anything because, hey, first new Star Trek in a decade, it looks cool, and what the hey, the Klingons were only onscreen for less than five minutes.

Then, on TNG, the Klingons had a Proud Warrior Code, as opposed to being the backstabbing jerks they'd been before that, but, hey, it made them more interesting, didn't it? And they aren't really Space Russians any more, right? And we just reused all the old Klingon props and uniforms left over from the movies (plus some stuff from the Planet Of The Apes movies, but shh, yer not supposed to notice that).

...and this brings us to the Kelvin Timeline, the odd new Klingons who wear helmets, and finally, the Discovery Klingons, who despite being ready to meet Captain Kirk in ten years, are inexplicably purple, lack hair, and fly around in giant Christmas ornaments that don't look a thing like D7 cruisers.

And the showrunners complain back at ME. "What are YOU whining about?" says the meme on Facebook. "You're just being a HYPOCRITE! The Klingons changed all the TIME in the old days! You choose NOW to whimper about it? Aaaah, you're just a big WIMP! WE changed things because those groady OLD klingons were all worn out and tired, and we're writing NEW stories and NEW arcs! You should LOVE these new Klingons! And you WOULD love them if you weren't just such a big ol' BABY about it!"

No... no, I don't think this has anything to do with IP rights or who owns the Klingons. In particular, I look at Spock's sister... the one nobody ever mentioned until suddenly she appears on this show, complete with psychic transmissions from Sarek whenever she wants some exposition. 

I think this is a case of someone who wandered in and instead of picking up the canon and existing characters, just said, "Naw, we're gonna introduce our own brand new everything, change everything because I think it would be cool, and if it won't fit in the box, clip it off. No one who matters will notice, and if the fans scream, we'll just shame them. We'll make it work..."

But if I am wrong, do jump in there.

I wonder if, when the Romulans appear, whether they will have polka dots and unicorn horns on their foreheads...

Edited by Dr.Bedlam
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no clue about Star Trek. But Fox owns movie rights to X-Men. So if the deal goes through, Disney will have the X-Men too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, redambrosia said:

I have no clue about Star Trek. But Fox owns movie rights to X-Men. So if the deal goes through, Disney will have the X-Men too. 

 

Some of the rights, anyway... X Men movies have been released by more than one company. Then again, if Disney gets the rights, maybe we can all forget about the terrible Inhumans TV show...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ST:TOS was produced by Desilu. Desilu was purchased (I believe during the show’s run) by Gulf + Western, then owners of Paramount Pictures, and renamed Paramount Television. Stuff got reorganized and sold off, but Paramount Pictures (who make the movies) and Paramount Television remained with the same company all the way through being bought by CBS and then Viacom’s ownership.

 

Then things get weird.

 

Viacom and CBS split in 2005, with Viacom becoming CBS and the rest becoming a new Viacom. This new Viacom ended up with Paramount Pictures and CBS with the television division. Anything made originally for the reboot movies is not necessarily available for use in television shows and vice versa from Discovery or any subsequent series.

 

To make matters worse, the merchandising rights are split between (at least) the two companies. Because that’s where the money is.

 

Klingons are Klingons though, since they appeared on TV first there shouldn’t be a problem with turtle-faced Klingons on TV, that’s probably just some unfortunate writer’s room decision making.

Edited by Sophie was taken
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Dr.Bedlam
      So I hear they're making another Star Trek television series. Apparently, they think this one is so good, people will pay to watch it, like HBO and Game Of Thrones. I have my doubts, but I haven't seen it, so what do I know?

      Star Trek has had several spinoff series of varying quality. I didn't expect to like Next Generation, but they lucked out with a combination of a cast that could do ANY durn thing (Patrick Stewart's one of the few actors I know of who can literally carry a one man show) and enough good scripts in the first two years to carry them past the bad ones (planet of the black people, anyone? How about the toga people who wanted to kill Wesley for stepping on flowers?)

      By the third season, though, the show really shone, and even its detractors had to admit it was some good television. So they decided to make ANOTHER one, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. And, again, after an uneven first season, it did some mighty good episodes.

      ...and then they tried yet again with Star Trek Voyager... which... was less good. More uneven. I don't know what it is about TV executives thinking that people want to see people on a spaceship all lost somewhere in the universe. I don't WANT to be lost. I liked Star Trek because they KNEW where they were, and could go home ANY TIME THEY WANTED. But, no, the TV execs think I want to identify with people stuck a zillion miles from home. But I digress.

      ...and then they tried again with Star Trek: Enterprise. Which... well, they tried.

      And now they're trying again with another prequel series. And I just don't know. This "prequel series" thing presumes I want to know what led up to Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock and everyone. 

      And I was thinking about this when I saw that one episode of the original series where Captain Kirk gets shanghaiied by the glowy brains to be a gladiator. Remember that one? The glowy space brains that have tremendous cosmic power and can't think of anything to do with it except set up sporting matches and bet on the outcome? And Captain Kirk convinces them that setting everyone free and setting up a civilization would be more interesting than betting on sports?

      First saw that episode when I was, I think, ten. It was good enough when I was ten. Now, I just wonder what the hell Captain Kirk was thinking, handing a civilization over to a race of glowy space brains that couldn't think of anything better to do with amazing cosmic powers than bet on how American Gladiators is going to turn out today. What kind of civilization are THESE people going to set up?

      And then I thought about it: what if a Federation spaceship happens to come back some hundred years later? What kind of civilization DID they set up?

      And that's when it hit me: they wanna do a new Star Trek series? Everyone I talked to agreed that Enterprise stank, all the way up until they remembered all the OLD Star Trek stuff... the Gorn, the Tholians, the Mirror Universe... all that old stuff left over from when Shatner and Nimoy were on board.

      What happened to all the Thralls on the planet of the gambling-addicted space brains?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Gangsters?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Nazis?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Romans?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Children who were actually 200 years old?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Indians?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Hippies With The Big Pompadours who worshipped the Computer Snake Monster Cave Thing?
      What happened to all the space women that Captain Kirk had, um, diplomatic relations with?

      It occurred to me that Captain Kirk alone left enough weird floating around in space that a whole new Star Trek series could spend the first couple seasons just finding out what happened afterwards. Did any of these planets join the Federation afterwards? Is there a whole planet of people who look like six year old Clint Howard? More importantly, are there a zillion space babies out there who resemble William Shatner?

      And lastly, is this new series going to be more interesting than finding out what the Space Hippies with the Big Pompadours did?

       
    • By Dr.Bedlam
      So I hear Paizo's got this new game, Starfinder, up and coming. And I am not sure what to think. 

      Pathfinder filled a need; I tried 4th Edition D&D, and did not much care for the radical changes after several years of 3.5. Pathfinder was just an extension of the d20 system, and worked well as a generic fantasy game ... that, as splatbook after splatbook and so forth, grew steadily less generic. Still a fine game, although it begins to show signs of splatcreak*, as the sheer amount of rules pile up.

      Makes sense they'd want to expand their base of gaming; a one-game company is vulnerable to changes in the market, and D&D has finally gotten its head on straight. Time to seek out new life and civilizations... if only to stay competitive. 

      But I dunno.

      First science fiction RPG I ever played was Traveller, which did an amazing job of distilling the basics down to three little booklets in a box, which seems to be how things were done, then. We had combat, we had spaceships, we had computers, find a ship, find a crew, find a job, keep flying. It worked. (I will not discuss Gamma World or Metamorphosis Alpha; while I enjoyed 'em, these were more postapocalyptic and less space opera, and this is hard enough to keep on track as it is).

      Another game, Space Opera, was interesting and fun, although waaaay too in love with its rulesset; as I recall, you could burn a whole gaming session just creating a character. Which I guess was a little better than Traveller, where you could accidentally get killed before your character entered PLAY, but Space Opera's extra crunchy rules were a bit much, even for the times.

      I enjoyed Star Frontiers, once TSR finally got off their duffs and designed a neat space opera setting, although I took it kinda personally that they did not include a starship design or purchase system, or for that matter much of any information about space travel other than "buy a ticket." What, Traveller could do it, but you can't? They were up front enough, though, about the fact that they'd be out with a separate boxed set that would include the starship rules... eventually. And they did. 

      Aaaand that's where we take a sharp left, because Star Frontiers was the last generic science fiction space opera I ever played.
       
      FASA quickly came out with a licensed Star Trek game, set during the TOS era, because that's all we had back then; Next Generation was still years away. Still remember the one adventure we played as Klingon officers, who wound up blowing up the ship due to a complex web of backstabbery... but I digress. Not long after that, they also came out with a licensed Doctor Who game, which preoccupied us for a while, as there were a hell of a lot of VHS tapes to track down to keep up with the setting! It did have the advantage of spreading across all TIME, as well as space... although we took a break when West End Games's Star Wars came out, because to a nerd-child of the seventies, the history of mankind breaks down into pre-SW and post-SW. After all, you never saw any Planet Of The Apes RPGs, did you? Hell, I still have a copy of Leading Edge's Aliens RPG around here somewhere; it was fun, albeit rather sketchy, as it was based entirely on the two movies in the Alien franchise as of 1988... had plenty of information about Weyland-Yutani, the Space Marines, the Aliens... and nearly nothing else...
       
      Which brings us to now. As I said above, Pathfinder filled a need.

      But there are a great many licensed science fiction games now. Firefly is still going strong. A new Star Wars game still circulates, albeit unsupported due to licensing. A new Star Trek game is in the works, assuming its maker ever gets it out of playtesting, and the current Doctor Who game still seems to be selling.

      Is there a place now for a generic science fiction setting? Will it appeal to people who've never tried Pathfinder? Or does the current market favor established licensed science fiction settings where one can watch a movie or three and get an idea INSTANTLY about the world and how it works?

      Opinions? Ideas? Rants?
    • By Pingo
      http://www.ew.com/article/2016/06/19/anton-yelchin-dead-dies
       
      Actor Anton Yelchin, known for playing Pavel Chekov in the newest reboot of the "Star Trek" franchise, died today in a freak accident, apparently pinned between his car and a brick post in his driveway.
       
      He was 27.
    • By Maledrakh
      This year the minis I manage to paint will all count towards the resolutionary challenge. As per the resolutionary painting challenge guidelines, I will post them here, and link in my post in the challenge thread.

       

      With the refurbishment of the old house complete and it now up for sale, I have at last some time to paint a miniature or two. It has been more than a month since I touched a brush smaller than two inches wide, and I have come to the conclusion that I utterly detest redecorating houses, especially everything that involves masking tape.

       

      Space...the final frontier.  These are the voyages....yeah, you know the rest.

       

      And these little grey aliens in Bones from the second KS. Just had to do them like the Blue Man Group were cosplaying some modern era Star Trek:

       

      Away Team, Command:

      Captain leading the away team, wearing the red shirt of command. What can possibly go wrong?

       

      Away Team, Security: 



      "We are the Bald. Resistance is Futile. You must comply." -Locutus of Bald

       

      Away Team, Medical:

      The one to the right...Mould line to the face!

       

      And, yes. Those are Voyager uniforms, not Next Generation.

      I switched the team members a bit around from what was on the sprues, because I thought my selections suited the roles better.

      Now to do the Flying Saucer up as the Yangtsee Kiang...

       

       

      80045,80046, and 80047: Gray Aliens

      Reaper Miniatures

      Bones KS2

      25mm bases

       
    • By Bruunwald
      It's so strange, because we were just talking about her on these very forums a few weeks ago.
       
      Yvonne Craig.
  • Who's Online   28 Members, 2 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)

×