Jump to content
Rat13

Song of Blades and Heroes?

Recommended Posts

I'm not a war gamer even though my GW collection seems to keep growing. My local shop doesn't do any wargaming, it's basically a Magic the Gathering shop. In all honesty I was surprised they were hosting D&D Adventure League when I started playing there.

 

Lately though after AL a bunch of us have been sticking around till close playing other games. Munchkin and Star Realms are pretty popular but we do get into other things from time to time. Those two just tend to be our go to games at the moment.

 

Since I started painting I've been watching a lot of videos on the hobby and one of the channels I've been watching is Tabletop Minions. If you've ever been there you know they talk a lot about war gaming and skirmish games. 

 

Well today that lead me to a skirmish game called Song of Blades and Heroes. It looked like a lot of fun with a very small learning curve. Basically it looks like something I'll be able to convince my group to try.

 

Recently I became a DM for our group so I already have enough miniatures to create multiple "groups/troops/bands"(not sure what the proper term is for this game). So really all they have to do is give it a try, there is zero buy in for them.

 

Does anyone here play this game? Is it as easy to learn as I've been lead to believe? I picked up the gist of it pretty quickly but will players be able to pick this up on the fly? As skimish games go how does this one rate?

 

I've already ordered the books, both the revised and the advanced editions so I'm in either way but I'm interested in seeing if anyone else plays this.

51AEk4q6fFL._SY400_.jpg

61efjFpSEiL._SY400_.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't played it very many times, but it's quick to learn and easy to play.  I taught it to several people, including some kids aged 7-12 without any problems.  Sure, it doesn't have some of the complexities as other games, but it's got enough that keep it fun. 

For the most part, it will probably be my default fantasy game rules from now on.  A large part of that is how simple it is to play/learn, how few minis it really needs to be fun, and how inexpensive the books are - all qualities I will be using to sucker recruit new mini games players in my small town. 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I haven't played, I want to.  The initiative function, where the acting player might lose the initiative to the other player, is really neat.  It appears that the game works best if you have similar power-level troops on both sides - one side filled with figures that activate on a 6 will likely lose to a force composed of higher quality models that activate on 4-5-6.

 

The fact that the base game is cheap is a plus. I can use paper miniatures if I want is a plus.  The fact that there aren't a ton of rules is a plus.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just accrued so many miniatures that I don't have a use for and I'd like to do something with them. This looked like the perfect solution.

 

It'll also give my group another game we can throw into the rotation while we talk and unwind after AL.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Rat13 said:

I've just accrued so many miniatures that I don't have a use for and I'd like to do something with them. This looked like the perfect solution.

 That was part of my motivation as well. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only played it once so far, teaching it to one of the guys at the local wargaming club, but it was a lot of fun and not hard to pick up for either of us. My only suggestion would be to watch how many different traits you're using in an introductory game, and not pick anything that looks too complicated (requiring more than a couple of sentences is a good indicator).

I'm a fan of the rules in any case, and I have plans to rope some of my friends into the game who have just gotten into wargames this year. Then it'll be on to other games by Andrea; Mutants and Death Ray Guns, Rogue Stars, and hopefully Harder Than Steel by the end of the year (fingers crossed).

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about the traits more than was probably necessary. I'm thinking about building the first two groups without any traits so there is less to keep track of and teach. Even without any traits though I think that first game will be enough to get everyone hooked.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried this game a few times with some primarily board gamer friends of mine and the results were underwhelming.  It's been a year or two since we played, but IIRC nobody in my group liked the initiative rule. It disengaged people from the game in a "I've failed to meaningfully activate my forces for 3 turns in a row now...you win, I concede" sort of way.  This, combined with how few dice are rolled when something does get to act, leads to a lot of whiff--tastic turns where nothing happens and you just feel like you're pointlessly rolling dice.   

 

This game would have been a great beer-n- pretzels, 30-minute war game if it had been, y'know, fun.  It actually worked as a mild turn-off to miniature war games in our case.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Rat13 said:

I've been thinking about the traits more than was probably necessary. I'm thinking about building the first two groups without any traits so there is less to keep track of and teach. Even without any traits though I think that first game will be enough to get everyone hooked.

 

I don't think you need to abandon traits altogether. Things like block, heavily armoured, good shot, and the various weapon traits are all easy enough to grasp. Just watch how many different ones are being used for each warband.

VitM I'm curious, were you playing standard SoBaH or the Advanced version? I think the reaction rules in Advanced Song of Blades are a great addition which helps keep both players involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dai-Mongar said:

 

I don't think you need to abandon traits altogether. Things like block, heavily armoured, good shot, and the various weapon traits are all easy enough to grasp. Just watch how many different ones are being used for each warband.

VitM I'm curious, were you playing standard SoBaH or the Advanced version? I think the reaction rules in Advanced Song of Blades are a great addition which helps keep both players involved.

 

We were playing standard SoBaH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have Advanced SOBH but I have a bunch of the other books. The basic game is simple enough and fun. We've only played a handful of times and it just never caught our attention like some other games. The activation rules ruined in for my younger son because he was the guy who couldn't make a decent roll all game several times. The sheer number of traits is a bit overwhelming at first. It seems like a decent system once you get some lists made up that suit your collection and I love the adaptability but we just decided we like Frostgrave more for the time being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Zink said:

...once you get some lists made up that suit your collection...


I think this is a key thing.   Playing scenarios instead of just a fight helps a lot, too. 

When I played it with the kids the first time, I had hastily scribbled lists for each of them, and ran a free for all scenario.   When we tried Galleys & Galleons two weeks later (similar system for ships, also by Andrea), I had taken the time to make nice little cards for each of their ships, and had a scenario game in place to play.  

As a result, the kids all said they liked Galleys & Galleons better.  The very smart (broccoli) autistic son of my friend pointed out that I should have done the cards and scenario for SoBH, too, because they were almost the same game.  In the end, they liked both games, once I did cards up for their forces. We were using both games as part of a 5e D&D campaign where the PCs were all pirate ship captains. 

Edited by kristof65
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had bashed out a quick scenario for the game I played, but my opponent made the comment that stat cards for all of the characters would have been handy and I'd have to agree. I've since played around at making cards with Magic Set Editor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually going to surprise my group with this game. So I'll be assembling forces and creating stat cards before the game. That way all they have to do is just give it a try.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Rat13  One thing I did (and I'm sorry I missed the thread!) is I made a note card of the traits that the army used for quick reference.  It sped up the game immensely when I taught my kids. 

 

It's a quick game and it allows for a lot of fun, I am planning a "battle at the farm" type scenario soon.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Rat13
      My wife and I have been interested in playing in an actual campaign for some time now, we enjoy Adventure League but we want more. We'd like to roleplay more and not be switching between characters all the time.
       
      My wife played with a group for a little while and they are getting ready to start a new campaign and asked if we would be interested. We talked about it and decided to join the group.
       
      Our first session is on the second of the year, so there has been a lot of back and forth between the players and the DM already. During the initial talks my wife put us both down to play barbarians with myself playing a dwarf specifically. I even built it early so it would be done and ready.
       
      That was fine for a few days but then the DM "requested" we play anything other than ordinary Player's Handbook races and he's really pushing us to play monster races. So I went along with this and remade my character. Then the DM "requested" that if we played barbarians we shouldn't pick totem or besereker, the PH options. Okay, so I rebuild again.
       
      Now the "request" is that we advance to level five and pick some magical items. He wants us to have an uncommon and a rare with the stipulation that the rare item should be our defining item (like excalibur for King Arthur). This is all in addition to the usual of coming up with a backstory, which you need to do for any game anyway.
       
      At this point I've made my character three times and frankly now I don't even want to play him. I'll admit I play dwarves a lot and the same can be said for totem barbarians. I roll poorly so being able to recklessly attack helps a lot, and the damage reductions for bear totem barbarians are nice too.
       
      So I started out excited to play and had an idea for a fun character. Now I don't want to play what I've built, especially for a long campaign and at this point I'm a little leary of the DM. If this is how character creation has been I'm fairly sure I don't want to play in this game.
       
      Should I back out now and hope they find a replacement? Should I go and potentially end up backing out after a few sessions?
       
      I don't want to waste anyone's time or screw over my fellow players or DM. I just can't help feeling that this DM won't be my cup of tea.
    • By Aryanun
      *BONK!* is here to answer your questions and give badmost excellent advice.
       

       
      Disclaimer: Not responsible for incidents, accidents, disability, dismemberments, bite marks, lumps on heads, death, random bits of cat fur or mummy wrappings, or monetary loss for following the advice of a mummified cat plush toy.
    • By Gargs
      Okay, so I am going to be painting up this guy soon:
       

       
      I'm curious about what colors to use for the snow on the snowman. It doesn't seem to be a pure white (which makes sense) but I couldn't tell really what colors were used. I know that blues and even really dark blues, are often used for shadows (I know that Nightmare Black is actually a favorite of at least one forumite), but its the "white" that has me unsure. Any ideas? (as for the base, I realize that there are a number of options for putting snow on the base).
       
      As always, thanks in advance for any help?
    • By Auberon
      Gaming books are just like any other book - they have word count targets as well as page count targets and the people who write them tend to go over their allotment. This requires an editor to trim the fat. Unfortunately one of the first things to go under the knife in a core book is the game master advice portion of the book. As anyone that's read more than a few tabletop RPG books has noticed, there is always some system specific advice, but the general advice seems to be the same basic ideas, maybe presented slightly differently, but repeated over and over across the industry.
       
      Fortunately over the last couple of decades more and more books geared specifically for game masters have been published. For those GMs that want to up their game, whether it be plot, combat, handling NPCs, worldbuilding, or problem players there's advice out there for that. Not all of them give good advice and not all are worth picking up. This thread aims to be a resource, not just creating a list of books but also giving a bit of a review.
       
      The books listed here will not include core books unless someone finds one with unique advice. At this point my idea is to keep the list more general and avoid books that are majority system specific.  You won't find the DMG listed here, but you might find a DMG II. After all, that's where the advice that got cut out of the first one ends up.
       
      Title: Cityscape
      Authors: Ari Marmell & C.A. Suleiman
      System: 3.5E d20 (w/ a lot of more generally applicable sections)
      Publisher: WOTC (2006)
      ISBN: 978-0-7869-3939-8
      In Print: No
       


      Title: GM Essentials Book 1: NPC Essentials
      Authors: Johnn Four
      System: Nominally 3.5E d20, but only one chapter is really tied to that system (a mini-adventure)
      Publisher: RPGObjects (2003)
      ISBN: 978-0-7869-3939-8
      In Print: No (?) Might be available electronically from Role Playing Tips (Johnn's Blog)
       

       
      Title: Hamlet's Hit Points
      Author: Robin D. Laws
      System: None
      Publisher: Gameplaywright (2010)
      ISBN: 978-0-9818840-2-8
      In Print: Yes
       

      Title: Heroes of Battle
      Author: David Noonan, Will McDermott, Stephen Schubert
      System: 3E (but applicable to other systems)
      Publisher: WOTC (2005)
      ISBN: 0-7869-3686-X
      In Print: No

       

      Title: Kobold Guide to Worldbuilding
      Author: Wolfgang Bauer, Michael Stackpole, Keith Baker, Monte Cook, and others
      System: None (fantasy-oriented)
      Publisher: Kobold Press (2012)
      ISBN: 978-1936781119
      In Print: Yes
       
       
       
      Title: A Mighty Fortress
      Author:
      System: 2E d20 (but it is also a historical reference)
      Publisher: TSR (1992)
      ISBN: 1-56076-372-8
      In Print: No, but .pdf
       
       
       
       
      Title: Play Dirty
      Author: John Wick
      System: None
      Publisher: John Wick (2015)
      ISBN: 978-0990547853
      In Print: Yes
       


      Title: Play Dirty 2
      Author: John Wick
      System: None
      Publisher: John Wick (2015)
      ISBN: 978-0990547860
      In Print: Yes
       

       
      Title: Robin's Laws of Good Game Mastering
      Author: Robin D. Laws
      System: None
      Publisher: Steve Jackson Games (2002)
      ISBN: 1-55634-629-8
      In Print: Not last I checked, but you can track down a .pdf
       
       
    • By SisterMaryNapalm
      Hello everyone,
       
      I could use an advice or more some thoughts on something I am working on.

      I've once again dived headlong right into a new project for someone else.
       
      The topic is a pulp style game that is set in an alternate time of the 40s and incorporates some kind of superold cults and stuff.
       
      Anyway - I've been task to create a faction consisting of an android species that was originally created by one of the fractions as some kind of statues and then came to life by being merged with a soul. But as metal is a obviously a really unfitting material to merge with souls, those machine lifeforms became something like lost souls.
       
      Not they are out for revenge and fight the other factions.
       
      I am currently thinking about the colour scheme. As for the bodies, I thought about using sisters of silence from the warhammer universe and equip them with swords, MG 42 and FG 42 light machine guns to make them fit into the whole scenario.

      As for the faces I wanted to use a more light colour and white hair. I mean - why should androids have got different hair colours?
       

       
      I'd like to have them have red glowing eyes. Like this:
       

       
      And I then I thought of using the YoRHa heavy armor of the NieR Automata franchise as color reference.
       
      This is a guild wars 2 mod that gets as close as possible.
       

       
      more picture here:
       
      GW Nier Automata Style Armor
       
      But now I thought ... maybe thats a bit too dark. I mean - rather dark weapons, dark clothes, dark armor, only a bit of light color on the head and the hair. I am not sure if I'd consider that fitting.
       
      I'd like to hear your opinions on that topic.
  • Who's Online   38 Members, 1 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)

×