Jump to content

AJCarrington

Members
  • Content Count

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0

About AJCarrington

  • Rank
    Rabble Rouser
  • Birthday 09/16/1970

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    SC / USA
  1. I haven't played around with the current version of the 3.x data file recently, but it never struck me as having any issues/difficulties with it. What sort of changes/modifications have you made? With the release of the 1.2 stats, making the changes to the data file should not be too difficult simply using the editor that comes with Army Builder. As well, adding additional abilities/equipment/etc. shouldn't be too difficult either, as long as the file was set up to handle it. I've haven't played around with with data files since 1.x; I did a lot of work on the Chronopia file. That being said, I'd have no problems playing helping out with the current files. If you want to drop me a PM Id be interested in getting a copy of what you've got.
  2. Thanks for the update Kit - muchly appreciated!! AJC
  3. I think that this is a great new feature and a great way to wet our appetites for upcoming releases. Any chance that you might be able to include some concept art along the way? AJC
  4. And now you can upgrade to CC3 Another program worth mentioning is Fractal Mapper V7.0 by NBOS Software. While not quite as "robust" as CC2, it is a pretty versatile program. An added bonus is that a number of the various "add-ons" for CC are standard features within FM. AJC
  5. Another system you might want to consider is "A Game of Thrones" by Guardians of Order, based upon Martin's Fire & Ice series. I'm not familiar with Pendaragon, bu the AGoT system is very "gritty" and I think it would suit an Arthurian campaign. Regards, AJC
  6. Primarily because of the art/design. AJC
  7. Wow!! Lots of comments... I've always approached BT as a boardgame; I don't think that it really compares to current mini games in any sense other than one can use minis to represent his/her mechs. My only beef with BT is that the mech designs seemed to plummet after TRO3050 came out - this is one of the things that has always appealed to me about CAV. One of the things I find intriguing about this announcement is that this has been in the works for a couple of years (gleaned from the BattleChat transcript), and they have kept their plans very quiet. Now, they're announcing a major re-investment into the market with major plans to promote and support the game. Note that ultimately the proof will remain to be seen until August. When it comes to CAV, the minis and designs are simply amazing (and yes, the game is pretty good too... ). However, it has taken a loooong time to get where they are today, and that was when BT and DP9 (recently) were in the dumps. For me, a major factor in playing/collecting a game is the fluff and background - something that BT has in abundance, but that CAV is lacking. Hopefully the pending release of CAV2 in the near ( ) future will be the start on much more CAV-goodness to come. Just my $0.02 worth... Regards, AJC
  8. For those interested, Classic Battletech is being "re-launched" at Gencon in August: Classic Battletech Announcement Not too sure how I feel about this; love the game (archaic though it may be) but don't like a lot of the minis (CAV has better designs and sculpts). AJC
  9. Thanks to all for their suggestions (both mini and game play)!! AJC
  10. What "kind" on mini are you looking for - fighter, thief, wizard, skeleton ? AJC
  11. Was wondering if people could throw out some suggestions as to possible minis to use for a hexblade character (most likely a half-elf)? Thanks in advance, AJC
  12. Check out "Gavin, Warrior Thief" (DA2857): AJC
  13. Thanks for the lead - this is exactly what I've been looking for. Regards, AJC
×
×
  • Create New...