Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation


About Soulmage

  • Rank
    Mostly Harmless
  1. Some have already been mentioned. . . but. . . More blackstar guys & galactic marines Good aliens ala genestealers/Aliens* to use them against Moderns including, SWAT, delta, seals, rangers, marines, somali irregulars, and fedayeen
  2. Are you serious?? Terminator Salvation was awesome!
  3. Thanks Bryan nice to know it's being considered.
  4. Well maybe I should clarify. . . I am talking about WWI/WWII naval here. . . not Age of Sail. AFAIK there is no age of sail 1/3000 scale miniature line, I believe those are 1/1200, 1/2400 only but I'm not an expert on that side . . . and that's not where the opportunity lies. Here's an example discussion from the miniatures page WWI naval forum which includes discussion of miniature scales and the relative merits of each. I'm at a loss as to how any veteran steel-battleship era naval wargamer could NOT be aware of 1/3000 scale. http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=168430 Oh. . . reading through that thread I guess I should also mention a fact somebody points out. . . 1/3000 scale is only made in Europe, and right now everybody in the US gaming in that scale, is having to order them from overseas. Reaper would be the ONLY U.S. supplier of 1/3000 scale miniatures. That said, I really don't care one way or the other about 1/2400 vs. 1/3000 scale. The main point is that the opportunity is there for Reaper to become a major player in a rapidly expanding market. My thinking was that 1/3000 provides a way to make them more cheaply and easily, but 2,400 would work too.
  5. To start with, saying you've never heard of a 1/3000 scale line of naval miniatures, really doesn't do much for your credibility on this topic. Try going to any forum that discusses naval waragaming and ask them what the most popular scales are. If you will re-read my post, you will see that I said specifically that GHQ and other niche producers would not be squeezed out, but that the opportunity exists to capture the bulk of the middle market. I would agree that many historical games - especially napoleonics and acw are not a good idea. However, the fact remains that naval wargaming is the exception and represents a unique opportunity within the historical genre. Many of the statements made in this thread accurately characterize the "old grognards" of historicals, which certainly do not represent a lucrative market. However, as I indicated above, naval wargaming is experiencing an explosion of "new blood" coming into the hobby thanks to the release of gateway systems such as Axis & Allies: War at Sea, and Victory at Sea. Reaper is well positioned to take advantage of this blossoming market. In fact the market is so hungry for quality miniatures outside the "top end" line produced by GHQ, that any new miniatures line release is widely circulated by word of mouth due to the excitement it generates.
  6. Here's an idea for a new product line Reaper could offer: 1/3000 scale miniatures of historical WWII and WWI ships. Over the past few years naval wargaming has experienced huge growth. New fast play naval systems coming onto the market have ushered in a whole new generation of naval wargamers. Increasing mainstream interest in naval topics is evident in such "hollywood style" naval programming such as Battle 360:USS Enterprise that is clearly marketed towards a younger audience. Wizards of the Coast recognized the emerging opportunity available in naval wargaming and released the A&A Naval miniatures game and experienced results that far exceeded expectations. What was supposed to be a once and done product line, has already gone back for a second supplement, with the possibility of more in the future. However, the A&A naval miniatures game is ultimately a fairly shallow experience, and most players, having whet their appetite for naval games, move on and start looking for more sophisticated games. In this way WotC has created an excellent gateway product for naval wargaming. There is a significant opportunity in the area of naval miniatures for Reaper to carve out a high profile and profitable niche. There are 3 major scales in use today, 1/6000, 1/3000, and 1/2400. 1/6000 scale miniatures are a niche product. Most people aren't interested in ships that small because they are REALLY tiny. With a couple exceptions 1/2400 is dominated by manufacturers who really make "models" rather than miniatures. A single ship in this scale might come in as many as a dozen pieces and cost up to $16 from the most widely recognized names. There are somewhat cheaper alternatives, but they give up lot of detail and still represent a hefty investment. 1/3000 scale is by far the most popular range. Unfortunately, there are only two manufacturers in this scale, one of which has almost completely ceased operations.* In addition, most of the molds date to the 70s with resulting decreasing quality of casts, and nothing new has been released in a decade or more. There is a huge opportunity for a major miniatures manufacturer to step in with a line of crisp, detailed, single-piece 1/3000 scale naval miniatures. Such a line would quickly take over the market and squeeze out all but the niche players (the hyper detailed expensive GHQ miniatures, and the 1/6000 scale crowd). Naval rules and miniatures are produced seperately for the most part, so players of any system would be interested in this miniatures line. If you wanted a rule set to associate the miniatures with, there are some good candidates out there. Reaper should already be well positioned to manufacture a naval range. All the same equipment used for casting the CAV miniatures would be usable for the simpler and smaller naval miniatures. In addition, there's no delay for from-scratch creative process, you can release miniatures as fast as you care to simply by converting historical designs from the ample information that is freely available into miniatures. With hundreds of designs to make just from WWI and WWII alone, you'll have releases in the queue indefinitely. Furthermore, once a few releases hit the market and make the splash they are guaranteed to make, there will be a huge upswell of damand for these miniatures. I doubt that you will be able to keep new releases in stock. Historical naval miniatures represent an excellent opportunity to create a new and profitable line for Reaper miniatures, as well as diversify the customer base. I hope you guys look into this. *It should be noted that both 1/3000 scale miniatures companies are small operations and are tremendously popular because 1/3000 is the best balance between price and scale. The manufacturer who is ramping down operations is not hurting for business. . . in fact inability/lack of desire to keep up with huge demand is what is causing that company to scale back as the owner goes into semi-retirement. Thus a field with already limited competition is getting narrower, even as demand is increasing.
  7. If you google Studio Bergstrom, he has a bunch of great ships.
  8. Played Starmada: Dreadnoughts, and its awesome! Fast and fun, just the way I like my naval games. I still prefer their Grand Fleets systems for smaller actions, as its more detailed and realistic. But if I'm in the mood just to blow stuff up. . . or if I want to run a big fleet action, Starmada: Dreadnoughts will fit the bill just fine. In fact, I'm giving serious thought to running Jutland at GenCon 2009 using Starmada: Dreadnoughts. THAT would be a good time! Anyway, if anybody has questions, just let me know!
  9. Not sure if this would work for you but here's an idea: Place several objective markers at various places on the tabletop. Anytime they get looted/investigated, roll on a table or against a target number to see if they were actually an objective and what they were, or just a false alarm. That way although the objective placement isn't strictly random, knowing what ends up where is.
  10. I've actually had an amazing amount of fun with WWI/WWII naval combat games in which manuevering is an important part of the game. Starmada isn't really set up to accomodate that style of play though - although its a good game for its intended purpose. Let me know if you want to try some wet navy stuff! BACK ON TOPIC. . . Yes, facing is necessary. The corners issue is a bit awkward, I wouldn't mind seeing that cleaned up. But I *LOVE* the fact that there are good "assassin" characters in the game. I think the facing rules for Backstab are an important part of that from a rules standpoint, but also from a flavor standpoint which is essential. Rear facings definitely need to stay in the game!
  11. I am a rules junkie. I play easily a half dozen miniatures games, and have played probably a dozen more, and have read the rules in detail for many more than that. I love analyzing rules finding out why things work a certain way and what effect that has on the game. I like tearing systems apart and rebuilding them to be better. I've done some work for several gaming companies as a rules developer on some high profile projects, just for fun. I have house rules for pretty much every system I play after only a few times playing them. When other people familiar with a game play by my house rules, they pretty much universally agree that they are big improvements on the game. I say all this so that you will understand me clearly when I say Warlord is a game with a very cogent and well balanced rule system. There are minor tweaks here and there I would suggest to the game but - I have not felt the need to implement ANY houserules with Warlord. As fantasy skirmish games go, its the best I've seen, hands down. It rewards tactical play, the units are well balanced, there are lots of options, and you can freely combat large, powerful creatures with lots of small "horde-style" creatures with neither side having an extremely large advantage over the other. This system works. Best of all, its really fun to play! Unlike many systems you stay involved in the game throughout the turn. Its exciting and fast paced - unlike many other fantasy skirmish and army games I've played that either have extremely stripped down rules that remove tactical decision making as a valuable skill, or overly burdonsome/slow paced rule sets that make the game drag out. You can play a decent sized game of warlord in an hour. You can play a really big game with multiple players on each side in about two and a half. If you like fantasy skirmish games, you owe it to yourself to check out Warlord.
  12. Not quite. I want: 1. A mechanic that works like spells so it remains balanced, but can't be counterespelled. 2. A mechanic that REQUIRES you to take a "breath weapon like" ability. No using spellcasting for healing spells or whatnot. 3. A mechanic that gives a good breath weapon flavor. 4. A mechanic that can be priced appropriately - since just spellcaster x/y assumes some capability that a breath weapon user might not have. Your mechanic addresses 1 and 4. Whether it addresses 3 is a matter of personal opinion. It does not address 2. If you start putting requirements into your ability on what spells they MUST take, then you're really better off just creating a new mechanic -- which is how I got to my proposal. The other suggestion made in this thread of: Breath Weapon (spell name)/x . . . is a good one. It was the other way I was thinking about going. That makes it very similar to a limited use innate spell - which is exactly what it ought to be. Either way, it would be great if we could get it in 08 since we're not really trying out anything super wild here. I guess it just depends on how long it takes to develop the point pricing model for a new SA.
  13. That rule addresses your own troops being caught in your AOE spell attack while in H2H. What about non-AOE attack spells cast into combat? Do they provoke discipline checks, cause automatic shaken tokens, or what?
  14. Well. . . its not really at the expense of the game or of the players if by doing so has helped Reaper maintain profitability and thereby continue to be around to produce and support the game. The industry is littered with the corpses of defunct miniatures games companies that failed to stay in the black. If not joining that heap means that sometimes Reaper takes some cost cutting measures, I'm all for it. All in all, I don't think the lack of a 100% new sculpt for Dwarven Kneebreakers is really a crisis.
  • Create New...