Jump to content

Are we looking at it wrong?


Spartan6
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think base to base is a little to close... I like 12". Allows you to CoD without haveing to be blatant about it. If your opponent sees you run up towards a damaged unit odds are he's going to unload on that model to keep the CoD from happening. 12" gives you the ability to CoD while still allowing for some tactical maneuvering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll compromise and say I could live with 6". ::):

 

I just can't see professional soldiers like we have in CAV turning on their own soldiers like with CoD. I think with a succesful CoD you should remove the model and gain like a 10% bonus to victory points for it or something like that.

 

I see it as a sort of surrender that includes the "propaganda" value of a captured soldier appearing on the vid later saying he's a war criminal and never should have shot at the benevolent followers of Khardullis, yada, yada, yada...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're going for "sense of impending doom" how about using the short range or point blank range already existing in the rules, not sure which would be better. You'd have to calculate which one you're in anyway if you're that close and declaring an attack or CoD. Definitely agree with DAs only though for CoD, but allowing for the wording to be "last attack" rather than "last damage track."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...