Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's happened again.


It's not EVERY episode of "The Big Bang Theory," but enough of them. At least two or three times a season.


I still remember how, when they were playing "Talisman" on the show, at one point, a "TOAD" token occupied the Crown of Command space. I mentioned aloud that if you actually were playing the game, it's not possible for a player on that space to become a toad, and it's not possible for a toad to get to that space, using the standard rules of the current edition.


...and everyone in the room looked at me like I'd just sprouted another pair of eyes.


It didn't help when I mentioned that in the original, it WAS theoretically possible, assuming another player hit you with the Random spell and rolled a "toad" result, right as you were entering the Crown of Command space. But not in the current edition. The errata took care of that.


At least this time, I was alone. Except for the cat, of course.


Recorded last night's "Big Bang Theory" on the DVR, and watched it when I got home from work. To keep it spoiler-free, part of the plot is driven by the fact that Penny goes to the comic shop and buys Leonard and Sheldon a pair of vintage Mego Star Trek Transporter Booths, circa 1975, mint in box! And Sheldon is overjoyed that it's scaled perfectly for his vintage 8-inch Mego Mr. Spock figure!


Well... it was a funny episode. I liked it. Had a terrific couple of surprises in it, which I will not spoil here. Very much plays into the nerdy premise of the show. Good episode.


...but Mego never made the transporter by itself, or sold it in that box (although the box art is very well done, and seems to be copied from the back of the blister cards for the figures). The transporter toy was sold only as part of the Mego Star Trek Enterprise Playset. I know. I had all of that stuff when I was eleven. Wish I still had it, to be honest. And, to be fair, the toy itself, when we see it, looks very much like the one that came with the playset, and seems to work the same way. Might even have been an original. But they were never sold boxed without the playset.


And this was the only place I could think of where I could post my nerd rage without being pretty sure everyone would look at me like I'd sprouted an extra set of ears...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm with ya, Doc. I do that all the time. My band-nerd wife giggles at me every time. I celebrate when the odd geek reference creeps into pop culture in its correct form and get uber-grumpy when it is not. I loved that the creator's of Dexter's Lab had things right when paying homage to D&D, but not so much when I catch any show or movie being inaccurate with their trivia of something in a fandom.


Relevant to said episode and toys, I wanted, I daresay dearly coveted all the Mego Star Trek item and only ever had one single alien figure. It was half black and half white and resembled neither Bele nor Lokai and it was wearing a helmet. Utter crap to a child who wanted the entire bridge crew. He was only usable with my Batman and Robin Megos. A friend of mine that is 19 years my junior purchased an authentic 1974 Mego Captain Kirk (MIB) for $80 at a local antique store and is going to Comicon to get Shatner to sign it. I am secretly very jealous of him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering about that myself. I was focused on Spock's wrist joints. They looked modern to me. I remember my Planet of the Apes Mego figures (as well as some of my older super-heroes) had a metal component in their wrists.



Interesting. I had Spock, Kirk, Scotty and Bones. All of them had flesh-colored (and I assumed, plastic) components in their wrists. As did the superheroes I had.


Got mine around 1977, though a couple of them had been my stepbrothers, from '75 or '76, and I seem to remember them all being plastic.


I had the Enterprise set, but I could have sworn the transporter pads were sold at some point with a figure? Or maybe that was part of a re-issue years later?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The style of the wrists/hands definitely changed at some point while the figures were being produced. I'm pretty sure I had examples of each in my collection.


And I think I might still have one of those Enterprise playsets up in my loft somewhere. Anyone know how much it's worth these days?

Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally, the Mego figures (beginning with Action Jackson, and working into the first superhero figures, which were DC (Superman, Batman, and suchlike), the joints were held in place with metal screws or rivets of some sort. They later became hollow metal rivets, and the last 8 inch figures used plastic fasteners, eliminating the use of metal in Mego figures altogether. I had the entire bridge crew at one point; I know Kirk, Spock, and Scotty all had metal pinned joints. Later versions of the same figures had plastic fasteners; I had a Klingon with plastic fasteners, and I'm almost sure that my Gorn had plastic fasteners (since the Star Trek Aliens line came out WAY after the original run of Bridge Crew).


Mego made a LOT of changes to each line as it evolved. Very much in demand with collectors is the original Removable Mask Batman, and one of the holy grails of the line is the Removable Mask Robin, which apparently only lasted through one production run before they said the hell with it and just painted the mask on. I had a Removable Mask Batman, but a painted mask Robin, and I was in there EARLY -- I had a doting grandmother who about lived at K-Mart, and the original boxed figures were only two bucks each...


I'd bet pretty good money that the Tiny Spock seen in TBBT was one of the modern reissues that can be had in a clamshell case for something like $20 these days. He looked way too new, and one of the first casualties of taking a Star Trek figure out of the package was the loss of the little silver Starfleet emblem sticker that went on the chest. This was one of the more regrettable things about an otherwise great line of toys: emblems and insignia were always applied with STICKERS, for potato's sake, which meant a week or so into play, Superman and Batman were going to lose theirs. The later Marvel figures had theirs silkscreened or stitched into the fabric, but apparently this was too much of a hassle to do with the little Starfleet uniforms...


I'm quite sure the Transporter was never sold by itself as a boxed item, at least not when Mego was still a functioning company. There have been multiple reissues in recent years; perhaps this has changed.


...and as long as I'm barfin' up trivia, it's said that the Mr. Spock figure was one of the things that really pushed Leonard Nimoy over the edge, as far as being mad at Paramount; they were making substantial money off of the licensing of Nimoy's very recognizable face, and Nimoy wasn't seeing a cent of it. This wound up being a major legal issue later, when the courts finally decided that movie companies could not own your face, no matter how many movies or TV shows you appeared in, unless you specifically gave them permission in writing.


The guy who helped ramrod this decision through? Guy name of Bela Lugosi, Jr., attorney at law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really wish I had kept all my Mego characters. I had a ton of the Marvel and DC heroes, most of the CHiPs sets and a bunch of Star Wars. Of course, I guess if I hadn't had them, played with them, and broke most of their arms off, they wouldn't be considered collectible now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd be surprised, Qwyk. The picture above is from MegoMuseum, a web site that not only acts as a museum and celebration of the old toys... it's a clearinghouse for collectors wanting to secure parts for old and used Megos. Believe it or not, I've seen individual Gorilla Soldier boots and pairs of Aquaman green mitt gloves go for real money... and if you have a Removable Robin Mask, you can about name your own price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as far as their displays of gaming are concerned, Big Bang Theory has always taken a bit of creative liberties as to what they can and can't do. A good portion of their WoW-related shots have inconsistencies with the actual game, mostly in the area that they don't deal with "bound" items - items that cannot be traded to another character. In fact, there was a whole episode dedicated to Sheldon trying to get his stuff back from someone trying to sell it, when his account gets hacked.


And in a more recent episode - it could be pointed out that parties in Star Wars - The Old Republic max out at four, not the five they were running - the four guys and Howard's girlfriend.


But I think one of the more disturbing things about their display of gaming was in an early Season One episode when the guys are all online playing WoW, and the camera starts from one side of the room, and pans across, showing each of the guys on their laptops with a headset on. Nobody's saying anything, or doing anything particularly weird, but by about halfway through the pan, there's a laugh track.


I guess four guys sitting around a living room with their laptops and headsets on is funny. Seemed pretty normal to me. :upside:


My 2 yen,



Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Artists

The makers of the show have repeatedly stated that they do not use a laugh track. I haven't been on set and then watched and episode to be able to personally verify, but they seem pretty adamant about it.


This week's game took us a while to spot, and it's too bad they didn't feature it a little more. (But then there were also no noticeable errors. And they showed bits stored in small tupperware type containers, which gamers definitely do.) Elder Sign, which is a Cthulhu mythos dice game from FFG.


I think TV shows and movies take liberties with pretty much everything for the sake of filming ease or plot purposes or to make an easy joke. If you know anyone of any profession, hobby or other activity depicted in a fictional media world, they will be able to tell you how they got things wrong. Often more significant than the geek culture errors in Big Bang (which I'm happy is at least exposing more people to different board games and so on). Do lab techs really go out and interview suspects a la CSI? Don't singing groups need to both decide on and practice their songs more than a week ahead of a contest as in Glee?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, real life shows use research and consultants. Jack Webb, producer of "Dragnet" and "Adam-12" did so much research, the LAPD made him an honorary cop, and used some of his "Adam-12" episodes as training films to show how given circumstances should be handled by police officers.


CSI is famous for being painstaking about its research, and then cutting corners on delivery. Yes, you can do super duper DNA spectroscopic analyses on hair fragments, but you're not going to get the results back anytime soon, much less in the same day.


I find myself wondering if Big Bang Theory has a nerd consultant... someone who changes the stock and comics at Stewart's Comic Shop in the show, and fills in the writers on what games are trending?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, maybe it's not a laugh track, Wren, but it did make me roll my eyes a bit when the audience was laughing before any real jokes (imo) were to be had. Seeing people in front of laptops with headsets just seems flat out normal to me. ::P:


My 2 yen,



Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Pingo
      Sweden is a major epicenter of the international LARP community, isn’t it?
    • By Dr.Bedlam
      I have a question for the group mind, and I'm tossin' it out HERE because this board is a congenial bunch and perhaps geeky enough that someone might have a clue as to the answers I'm lookin' for. But it's a COMPLICATED question, and requires some background.

      Awright, Star Wars. SW is owned by Lucasfilm, outright. No one owns any PIECES of it. And Lucasfilm is owned by Disney, so Disney's who you ask if you want to make a SW TV show, movie, theme park, candy treat, garment, or toy product. Period. One stop shopping. Perhaps Disney's licensing department has a special Star Wars division, but that's about it as far as divisions go.

      Now, The Walking Dead is a little different. Anything based on the TV show has to go through AMC, the TV cable channel that produces the show. However, there is an entirely separate licensing division based on the comic book that the TV show was lifted from. Hence, you want to make a Daryl Dixon action figure, or use the likeness of Andrew "Rick" Lincoln, you go through AMC... but you could make a TWC miniatures game based on the likenesses of the comic characters by simply contacting rights owner and TWC creator Robert Kirkman. But there's TWO different ways to go.

      ...which brings us to The Avengers/Marvel. The Marvel Cinematic Universe... that is, The Avengers, Hulk, Thor, and Captain America... is OWNED by Marvel Comics, which is owned by Disney, who made the movies. However, the Fantastic Four are owned by Marvel/Disney, but 20th Century Fox has the movie rights, and made the movies, while Sony has the movie rights to Spider-Man, and I'm STILL trying to figure out who-all has the rights to X-Men.

      All the CHARACTERS are owned by Marvel, but the MOVIES and MOVIE RIGHTS are tied up nine ways from Sunday by different companies, to the point where getting Spider-Man for the last Avengers flick was considered a major achievement. And SOME of these people are JERKS about it; the first Fantastic Four movie was literally made solely to keep the movie rights, and was never intended to be released, and when the rightsholders wouldn't sell back or even lease the rights back to Disney, Marvel cancelled the FF comic in retaliation... despite it having been in print continuously since 1963.

      But I'm digressing; this is piled too deep as it is. So back to my question: I'm thinkin' about Star Trek.

      Been on a bit of a kick lately; bought the Modiphius minis for the Next Gen bridge crew, and have begun acquiring the HeroClix minis of the original series. And I have been in several discussions about the new Star Trek TV series, about which I have mixed feelings, particularly about the Klingons, who for some reason still speak tlhIngan Hol, straight out of Okrand's dictionary, but in no way resemble any Klingons ever seen on TV or movies previously, as well as having some weird new cultural traits.

      I do not care for this. I want the Next Gen Klingons back. But the show is what it is, and some like it and some don't, and, well, we'll always have Qo'Nos, right?

      But then someone on Facebook was tellin' me, "Dude, it's because the people makin' this new show don't have the rights to the old style Klingons."

      I said, "Hah? It's Paramount. Paramount Pictures bought the rights from Desilu Studios, back in the day. How can they not have the rights to their own show?"

      "Naw, dude, Paramount split from Viacom, and now they both have different rights to different parts of Star Trek, dude. That's why Shatner's Captain Kirk was born in Iowa but grew up on space colonies, but Chris Pine's Captain Kirk grew up on Earth and stole classic cars. That's why the new Klingons are bald and blue and fly around in giant Christmas ornaments, dude -- they had to create NEW Klingons, because the OTHER company has the rights to the Michael Dorn Klingons."

      "................do WHA?"

      So I did some research. Then I stopped, because my head hurt. Near as I can tell, boiled down, Viacom has SOME of the Star Trek IP rights... and Paramount has some OTHER Star Trek IP rights... but as far as I could tell, it was largely a matter of who could make TV shows as opposed to who could make and distribute movies. And if Klingons are a bone of contention, why are there Vulcans in all the new iterations?

      Are Klingons an issue of property rights, or did someone just say, "Naw, I think Klingons should be bald and blue now, for no apparent reason, other than that I am a Hollywood Big Shot, and I Say So,"?

      And what about the merch rights?

      Can anyone out there shine some light on this?

    • By Dr.Bedlam
      So I hear they're making another Star Trek television series. Apparently, they think this one is so good, people will pay to watch it, like HBO and Game Of Thrones. I have my doubts, but I haven't seen it, so what do I know?

      Star Trek has had several spinoff series of varying quality. I didn't expect to like Next Generation, but they lucked out with a combination of a cast that could do ANY durn thing (Patrick Stewart's one of the few actors I know of who can literally carry a one man show) and enough good scripts in the first two years to carry them past the bad ones (planet of the black people, anyone? How about the toga people who wanted to kill Wesley for stepping on flowers?)

      By the third season, though, the show really shone, and even its detractors had to admit it was some good television. So they decided to make ANOTHER one, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. And, again, after an uneven first season, it did some mighty good episodes.

      ...and then they tried yet again with Star Trek Voyager... which... was less good. More uneven. I don't know what it is about TV executives thinking that people want to see people on a spaceship all lost somewhere in the universe. I don't WANT to be lost. I liked Star Trek because they KNEW where they were, and could go home ANY TIME THEY WANTED. But, no, the TV execs think I want to identify with people stuck a zillion miles from home. But I digress.

      ...and then they tried again with Star Trek: Enterprise. Which... well, they tried.

      And now they're trying again with another prequel series. And I just don't know. This "prequel series" thing presumes I want to know what led up to Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock and everyone. 

      And I was thinking about this when I saw that one episode of the original series where Captain Kirk gets shanghaiied by the glowy brains to be a gladiator. Remember that one? The glowy space brains that have tremendous cosmic power and can't think of anything to do with it except set up sporting matches and bet on the outcome? And Captain Kirk convinces them that setting everyone free and setting up a civilization would be more interesting than betting on sports?

      First saw that episode when I was, I think, ten. It was good enough when I was ten. Now, I just wonder what the hell Captain Kirk was thinking, handing a civilization over to a race of glowy space brains that couldn't think of anything better to do with amazing cosmic powers than bet on how American Gladiators is going to turn out today. What kind of civilization are THESE people going to set up?

      And then I thought about it: what if a Federation spaceship happens to come back some hundred years later? What kind of civilization DID they set up?

      And that's when it hit me: they wanna do a new Star Trek series? Everyone I talked to agreed that Enterprise stank, all the way up until they remembered all the OLD Star Trek stuff... the Gorn, the Tholians, the Mirror Universe... all that old stuff left over from when Shatner and Nimoy were on board.

      What happened to all the Thralls on the planet of the gambling-addicted space brains?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Gangsters?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Nazis?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Romans?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Children who were actually 200 years old?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Indians?
      What happened to the planet of the Space Hippies With The Big Pompadours who worshipped the Computer Snake Monster Cave Thing?
      What happened to all the space women that Captain Kirk had, um, diplomatic relations with?

      It occurred to me that Captain Kirk alone left enough weird floating around in space that a whole new Star Trek series could spend the first couple seasons just finding out what happened afterwards. Did any of these planets join the Federation afterwards? Is there a whole planet of people who look like six year old Clint Howard? More importantly, are there a zillion space babies out there who resemble William Shatner?

      And lastly, is this new series going to be more interesting than finding out what the Space Hippies with the Big Pompadours did?

    • By Dr.Bedlam
      So I hear Paizo's got this new game, Starfinder, up and coming. And I am not sure what to think. 

      Pathfinder filled a need; I tried 4th Edition D&D, and did not much care for the radical changes after several years of 3.5. Pathfinder was just an extension of the d20 system, and worked well as a generic fantasy game ... that, as splatbook after splatbook and so forth, grew steadily less generic. Still a fine game, although it begins to show signs of splatcreak*, as the sheer amount of rules pile up.

      Makes sense they'd want to expand their base of gaming; a one-game company is vulnerable to changes in the market, and D&D has finally gotten its head on straight. Time to seek out new life and civilizations... if only to stay competitive. 

      But I dunno.

      First science fiction RPG I ever played was Traveller, which did an amazing job of distilling the basics down to three little booklets in a box, which seems to be how things were done, then. We had combat, we had spaceships, we had computers, find a ship, find a crew, find a job, keep flying. It worked. (I will not discuss Gamma World or Metamorphosis Alpha; while I enjoyed 'em, these were more postapocalyptic and less space opera, and this is hard enough to keep on track as it is).

      Another game, Space Opera, was interesting and fun, although waaaay too in love with its rulesset; as I recall, you could burn a whole gaming session just creating a character. Which I guess was a little better than Traveller, where you could accidentally get killed before your character entered PLAY, but Space Opera's extra crunchy rules were a bit much, even for the times.

      I enjoyed Star Frontiers, once TSR finally got off their duffs and designed a neat space opera setting, although I took it kinda personally that they did not include a starship design or purchase system, or for that matter much of any information about space travel other than "buy a ticket." What, Traveller could do it, but you can't? They were up front enough, though, about the fact that they'd be out with a separate boxed set that would include the starship rules... eventually. And they did. 

      Aaaand that's where we take a sharp left, because Star Frontiers was the last generic science fiction space opera I ever played.
      FASA quickly came out with a licensed Star Trek game, set during the TOS era, because that's all we had back then; Next Generation was still years away. Still remember the one adventure we played as Klingon officers, who wound up blowing up the ship due to a complex web of backstabbery... but I digress. Not long after that, they also came out with a licensed Doctor Who game, which preoccupied us for a while, as there were a hell of a lot of VHS tapes to track down to keep up with the setting! It did have the advantage of spreading across all TIME, as well as space... although we took a break when West End Games's Star Wars came out, because to a nerd-child of the seventies, the history of mankind breaks down into pre-SW and post-SW. After all, you never saw any Planet Of The Apes RPGs, did you? Hell, I still have a copy of Leading Edge's Aliens RPG around here somewhere; it was fun, albeit rather sketchy, as it was based entirely on the two movies in the Alien franchise as of 1988... had plenty of information about Weyland-Yutani, the Space Marines, the Aliens... and nearly nothing else...
      Which brings us to now. As I said above, Pathfinder filled a need.

      But there are a great many licensed science fiction games now. Firefly is still going strong. A new Star Wars game still circulates, albeit unsupported due to licensing. A new Star Trek game is in the works, assuming its maker ever gets it out of playtesting, and the current Doctor Who game still seems to be selling.

      Is there a place now for a generic science fiction setting? Will it appeal to people who've never tried Pathfinder? Or does the current market favor established licensed science fiction settings where one can watch a movie or three and get an idea INSTANTLY about the world and how it works?

      Opinions? Ideas? Rants?
    • By Pingo
      Actor Anton Yelchin, known for playing Pavel Chekov in the newest reboot of the "Star Trek" franchise, died today in a freak accident, apparently pinned between his car and a brick post in his driveway.
      He was 27.
  • Who's Online   14 Members, 0 Anonymous, 102 Guests (See full list)

  • Create New...