Jump to content

Storm Giants


Shadowdragon
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

Yes, but throughout these discussions is the assumption that women find "steamy" the male version of what men find same. Women are not as visually-oriented as men, including what they find sexual. That's why romance *novels* are oriented towards women, while men's magazines.. aren't. (Is Playgirl still on the racks?)

 

I'm also shrugging my shoulders that traditional fantasy miniatures are important to (sweeping generalization) women in the first place. Yes, there are many women who paint these sort of miniatures, but if you look on, say, pinterest or tumblr, these sort of miniatures aren't even on the radar. It reminds me of the days when fanboys would argue about how comics weren't female-friendly (eg. the girlfriend in the refrigerator). While they were arguing, the manga market steamrolled past comic books because they were more than female versions of traditional comic books.

 

Now, you'll excuse me while I catch up on my scrapbooking and dollhouse threads.

 

I wonder if this is really true that woman aren't as visually-oriented as men or just they key in on looking at different things for different reasons. If a study is looking at one type of visual material for instance focusing on the sexual it might miss that visual stimulation is going on in other areas. Woman in studies from what I remember distinguish between more colors. Also your examples are kind of funny. With comics you talk about the western ones not being as popular with women but manga is also very visual and from what you say has a greater female following. (I'm in Korea and a lot of my female students read it) At the end you mention scrapbooking and dollhouse stuff. Both of these are also very visual. I'm also not sure dollhouse is that far off from the style of miniatures here. Buildings, small people, furniture being painted and made. Setting is completely different and the activities the miniatures engage in, I think probably has a greater impact than visual or not visual.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 525
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm also not sure dollhouse is that far off from the style of miniatures here. Buildings, small people, furniture being painted and made.

 

Hey, hey hey, this is MANLY furniture I am delicately painting for inclusion in my painstakingly intricate out BUT MANLY dollhouse. I mean dungeon!

 

 

 

Ahem. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to finish painting some really lovely freehand designs on the princess of the elves' summer dress. IN A MANLY FASHION.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have any problems with the storm giantess or any given Reaper model and I did like that a lot of females are represented.. But at the same time as the Kickstarter went by I wanted to see less busty models that I felt would be more realistic. A lot of these are sword swinging woman. If you see pictures of female body builders they don't have much up there most of the time. It's all muscle muscle muscle. Also most of the people I play board games with are men and though we do play female characters once in a while most of the time we play men more which means for character sculpts male minis are a bit more useful on the table.

Reminds me of Frasier, when Roz is giving him online dating advice. "Athletic is just another word for flat-chested."

Also, I LOLed seeing the difference between the females and males in WoW. Females were lithe no matter the class or race, while males were bulky and broad shouldered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have any problems with the storm giantess or any given Reaper model and I did like that a lot of females are represented.. But at the same time as the Kickstarter went by I wanted to see less busty models that I felt would be more realistic. A lot of these are sword swinging woman. If you see pictures of female body builders they don't have much up there most of the time. It's all muscle muscle muscle. Also most of the people I play board games with are men and though we do play female characters once in a while most of the time we play men more which means for character sculpts male minis are a bit more useful on the table.

Reminds me of Frasier, when Roz is giving him online dating advice. "Athletic is just another word for flat-chested."

Also, I LOLed seeing the difference between the females and males in WoW. Females were lithe no matter the class or race, while males were bulky and broad shouldered.

 

I did a search on Reaper for "nude female" and "nude male." "Nude female" gave about what you would expect: babe after babe after babe. "Nude male" gave two results: Garravank the Ghoul King (yuck!) and a clad male vampire chomping on a nude woman.

 

"Naked female" also gives babe after babe after babe.

 

But "naked male" gives you -- OH MY GOSH GET THE BRAIN BLEACH PLEASE AUGGGGH!

 

*Cough* -- gets you lots of lumpy horrific monsters and things. Naked.

 

Not quite sure what to make of that.

 

(Looking closer, the "male" search does eventually include "Surfer Dude," who is wearing knee-length shorts and is about as erotic as a picnic table. And "The Invisible Man" (?) who is nothing *but* clothing. ... Still not sure what to make of this.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nevertheless, we try to use sensuality and nudity only where it is appropriate to the figure, for the character, the story, or the imagery. Obviously, Valloa would not be appropriate as a nude figure, for example.

 

What?! Why not? You got a thing against pointy, um, ears or sumthin'?!

 

And I once had a character just like that but she ran around nekkid, so I can't use Valloa. Besides, that wasn't my character's name.

 

 

 

:devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...