Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A while back I ordered some elves from Thunderbolt Mountain by the legendary Tom Meier of Ral Partha founding.

 

They are beautiful, but I have a question -- advice to ask, really, about the horses.

 

These are definitely elven horses, impossibly elegant, refined, like an Arabian cubed, almost insect-like, like the three-dimensional embodiment of George Stubbs' stunning eighteenth century horse portraits.

 

Which means they are gorgeous, but yikes, their legs are thin.

 

So I have, for example, this model:

 

post-8022-0-46737800-1367525816.jpg

 

Which, by the way, is true 25mm scale, so even smaller than it looks.

 

Now of course it needs a little filing and clean up, but my question is a little more material.

 

I am scared to remove the support sprues under its legs. I have terrible visions of that one rail-thin rear ankle supporting the entire model and succumbing to even gentle in-game handling.

 

I appeal to the combined wisdom and experience of the boards. How would you deal with this?

 

Is it kosher to leave the sprues in? Can they be maybe camouflaged? Painted black and pretending they are not there? Covered with tall grass? Will more experienced modellers mock me for my cowardice?

 

Help?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The grass idea may be your best bet. That rear leg will NOT be enough to support the whole thing - particularly not if it has a rider. I'd file away the flash on the sprue bits, paint them a dark colour or something that matches your basing, and then try and blend them into some grass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off that horse is in an unnatural pose. Having said that. You will only be ribbed for cowardice if this is a model for display. :poke:

On this model, and for gaming purposes I would remove the sprues in the middle of the figure and disguise the front one with sculpted dust, or Silfor buffalo grass. That way the figure is less likely to get ruined at that rear hoof

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not totaly unnatural. We used to have an Arabian mare who would dance around a bit, sortta like that. Not a natural posture for any real movement. Of course for that the tail should be up more, and the chin tucked in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very common for sculptors of running horses to sculpt tufts of grass under one or more of the raised feet for exactly the reason you're talking about. It probably wouldn't be especially difficult to add a bit of epoxy putty to the existing vent sprue to camouflage them. And as others have noted, support is almost certainly necessary for a play figure.

 

That said, one of the display pieces in Bill Horan's Military Modeling Masterclass is of three jumping horses connected to the ground by a single hoof. (Note: Not one hoof per horse, one hoof total.) The second and third horses are connected to the first with a horizontal armature that runs through points where the figures touch. Amazing stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off that horse is in an unnatural pose. Having said that. You will only be ribbed for cowardice if this is a model for display. :poke:

On this model, and for gaming purposes I would remove the sprues in the middle of the figure and disguise the front one with sculpted dust, or Silfor buffalo grass. That way the figure is less likely to get ruined at that rear hoof

Not totaly unnatural. We used to have an Arabian mare who would dance around a bit, sortta like that. Not a natural posture for any real movement. Of course for that the tail should be up more, and the chin tucked in.

It looks to me like it's based on Eadweard Muybridge's photographic studies of horses at the full gallop. For example, the fifth image in this sequence looks very similar.

 

As such, it doesn't look that unnatural to my eyes. The two forelegs have been subtly modified from their normal positions: the curled up one should be very tightly curled up, with the hoof almost pointing up at the heart, and the farthest forward leg should be thrust out further, almost horizontally before the lower joint and hoof point in a straight line to the ground. Also, in a full gallop the animal's neck would be at a lower angle, the head held less high. So yes, the tail would be higher and the chin tucked in.

 

I suspect these of being deliberate artistic decisions to make the horse look more upright and relaxed than a real horse could running that fast, thus making it look more fey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got this crazy idea to give it support. Have it dancing on a bunch of kobolds, driving them into the ground. It's a warhorse right? :devil:

 

That's how one of mine got the name "Smushfoot".

 

And then there was "Neverburn", a replacement horse after I learned the hard way on its predecessor that potion of firebreath + horse = bad news. (Neverburn was killed by cone of cold, so the name did work)

 

And then there was "Chestnut" - a broken down old nag I got when it was the only horse available, who proved to be the best warhorse I ever had. Through the magic of dice rolls, every time I needed Chestnut to be brave and charge into battle I rolled a 1 on my check and she did the job. Until one day, when she got shot in the rump by a goblin arrow. Prior to this, Chestnut had never been hit in combat. I had to make a riding check to stay on, and blew it with a 20. Chestnut tossed me off and ran off into the sunset, never to be seen again.

Edited by buglips*the*goblin
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite never to be seen again buglips. I heard she was working in the far corners of Skyrim with a former adventurer who had to retire and become a guard. He also took an arrow, though not to the rump.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By 72moonglum
      Good morning Reaperniks!
       
      So I've had this mini painted already about a week, but here in Omaha, it's been mostly kind of cloudy and rainy, so wasn't able to get a decent picture until this morning.
       
      This is Merlyon the Sorcerer, formerly of Thunderbolt Mountain and now being released by Ral Partha Legacy. Pretty fun figure to paint, and it's more akin to that 25 mm of yore:
       

       
      I still have a few more from this range I want to get around to painting. This one also had the eyeholes poked into the eyes, but they worked out this time pretty simply.
      Eyeholes in the owl too!
       
      Anyhoos, please enjoy responsibly!
       
       
    • By 72moonglum
      So hello all you Reaperphonics!  
       
      So finished this one recently.  I'd done the other Flying Pink Unicorn, and wanted a slightly different version of pink, so here's what I came up with.  This one, like the other fairy ballerinas, was sculpted by Tom Meier inspired by a design from his daughter with his company Thunderbolt Mountain Miniatures and now sold by Ral Partha Legacy.  Lots of different pictures because it's mini with basically lots angles, not just front and back, hope not too many photos:
       

       
      They are the last of my ballerina fairies that I had from Ral Partha Legacy, going to have to now move on to something different I guess, maybe some Reaper Bones.....
    • By 72moonglum
      Hello all you Reaperoloques, anxiously waiting for your Kickstarter boxes to arrive at your doors!
       
      I got my notice and hopefully I'll be seeing a big, beautiful box of plastic joy this Wednesday!  But in the meantime, just plugging away painting...
       
      So I just finished these two Thunderbolt Mountain minis, and if you recall last time, I took y last photos with my new iPhone.  I considered doing this again with these two minis, but took photos with my camera and then with the iPhone, and the iPhone photos were too brash or stark, so I'm using the camera photos instead.
       
      First Morgan le Fay:
       

       
      and then the Lady in Waiting:
       

       
      Both of these are available again for sale on Ral Partha Legacy's site, and actually they both come in the foot and mounted versions, but way back when, when I bought these, I didn't get the mounted versions, just their standing forms. 
       
      Enjoyed doing both of them very much.  The only odd thing again were they had those eyes with recesses for the irises, which I don't really like, but at least in this case worked out I think okay.  I actually did a base walnut brown cover for the eyes and then when I went over them in white, the recesses remained unpainted and brown, so they turned out okay.  I think for the future though, with more of these recessed eyeballs I'll actually paint the color in that section and then go over them again with white. 
       
      Another thing to mention is these are true 25 mm figures, when that used to mean something, so these are very small.  
       
      Anyhoos, hope you enjoy and these can momentarily distract you whilst you wait for your boxes to arrive!
       
      Happy Independence Day for those gringos that celebrate it, and Happy Sunday for those that don't!
       
       
    • By 72moonglum
      Hello all you mortals hanging from this Reaper coil!
       
      So tonight is another Tom Meier miniature, from his Arthurian range, which is now once again available at Ral Partha Legacy, the Lady of the Lake.  I'm really starting to get into these figures even with their small sizes and petite little heads. These are true 25 mm figures.  Got a few more kind of schedule to work on in the near future as well:
       

       
      and a close up of her face, which, with my new iPhone I can apparently get very close up:
       

       
      and a back view:
       

       
      The only bummer about this one was I made her what I thought was going to be a nice little base, because she doesn't come on a base.  You can either glue her to a small square metal base or create something.  So I did a base which had "water" at the edge.  After I got it done and it dried though, I tried to get her on it, and her cloak was so long and straight across, I couldn't get it to accommodate itself to the base in a flat way to make it look good.  So I just threw some putty on another base, let it dry, and then just painted if simple blues.
       
      Her color scheme itself is some pretty monotone colors, lots of blues, with just the flowers in her hair to have some bursts of color. 
       
      Anyway, hope you enjoy!
       
       
       
       
    • By 72moonglum
      Good evening Reaper Hoppers and Poppers,
       
      So I just finished this miniature, who is a pretty small one. She's Gwenyvere, from Tom Meier's Arthurian line at Thunderbolt Mountain, currently being produced by Ral Partha Legacy.
       
      I just got a new iPhone, and I took the pictures with it.  I think the pictures came out really nicely, and have done an automatically good job on the exposure and all.  My concern is does the automization of the exposure make it any different than if I would have had to work a little bit with the exposure?
       

       
      To give a comparison, here is how my camera turned out:
       

       
      It's a lot darker.
       
      Anyhoos, looking for photographic opinions. 
       
      And to give you an idea of how small this figure it is, here she is in comparison to a US quarter:
       

  • Who's Online   17 Members, 1 Anonymous, 37 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...