Jump to content

"Premium" versions of old D&D books


Recommended Posts

  • Forum Mascot

Aside from the late-era power creep, and aesthetics, I don't have a problem with the 2E reprints. In play we use both kinds with equal frequency. I don't like having my books touched in any case, because mine are the only ones not yet mangled. I swear I play with cavemen.

 

3rd Edition I did have a problem with, although in retrospect I think it was probably a necessary evolution. At the time, however, I did not. For me the pre-3 timeline made sense. You had Original D&D which was cobbled out of the Greyhawk and Blackmoor house rules. So that had a reason to exist. And then AD&D came out and built on and expanded those rules. So that had a reason to exist. And then when that got additions over time (like proficiencies) it got seriously disorganized and unwieldy. So along comes 2nd Edition, which re-organized and cleaned it up.

 

It was all based in the same ruleset from the beginning, and just iterations and refinements of that system.

 

But 3rd Edition broke away from this and became a new thing. So for me, it didn't feel necessary. It felt like change for the sake of change, and an excuse to gouge players for new rulebooks again. That bugged me.

 

Now that I've had some time to review the Pathfinder stuff, which grew out of the 3rd Edition change, I have to agree that the evolution was probably for the better. In fact, we have adopted some of it into the 2nd Edition game. But back when it first came out? Oh no, no, no. It struck me as forced obsolescence and really ticked me off.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Context is important, and what separates a good critic from a grumpy hack.   That's why I maintain that Sucker Punch is grotesquely underrated. It's not a movie for everybody, but there's a lot to

They were my first D&D books. Problematic thought they were, I have a certain fondness for them the way people have fondness for the (usually) terrible children's books that first got them excite

I did a search on WOTC's D&D forums for "reprints 2nd errata", and found a thread in the May 25-27,2013 range indicated there that errata was incorporated into the 2e reprints. Two posters confir

For me, D&D was obsolete by '78. By that point, everything (except Tunnels and Trolls, of course) was better, and Gygax had started ranting about playing "correctly" in Dragon. So I walked away to Traveller, Rune Quest, Chivalry & Sorcery, EPT, Champions/Fantasy Hero, and others.

 

Oh, I played D&D when I couldn't find a group that was playing something better, but that didn't happen all that often.

 

2nd Ed. was just the same first-generation-style thing all over again, but Gygax had drifted on to other projects, so I bought a fair amount, mostly out of nostalgia. Never played much of that edition at all.

 

3rd Ed., though, was a solid second generation evolution of D&D, better balanced, and much cleaner. And I knew the WotC people moderately well, so I wanted to support them. And it wasn't published by TSR, which was a huge plus. (I was a subscriber to both Ares and Strategy and Tactics when TSR killed SPI, so there was quite a bit or residual resentment.) IOW, I liked 3rd Ed. for many of the reasons Buglips hated it. And Pathfinder is essentially more of the same, so I've kept up with it since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See, I view 3rd edition as a necessary evolution myself. Over time a game like D&D, which has supplements and new books published for it on pretty much a monthly basis, will have rule bloat and power creep start to take over. 2nd edition came out in 1989 and lasted until 2000. 1st edition was from '78 to '89. Both had 11 years of constant updates and additions to he rules, which will leave a game convoluted and in need of revision. Basically, once the game hits a certain point with supplements, you need a revision that incorporates some of the more popular stuff in a balanced fashion.

 

But man, 3rd edition to 3.5 was just way too quick at just 3 years. Heck, 3.5 to 4th edition was pretty quick too. 3.5 had only 5 years of its own before 4th popped out, though from what I understand the power creep hit really quick with 3.5. My group didn't play pure 3.5 and had limited access to the books so I can't verify that, but it's something I've heard.

Edited by Unruly
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Forum Mascot

Well, there's never been a consensus. :lol:

 

There are people like Doug who abandoned the game. People who thought AD&D detracted from the basic game. People who thought 2nd was dumbed down. And people who looked at 2n Edition holdouts like they were against progress . . . until 4th came along and then they understood.

 

Each iteration has its defenders and detractors. I'm picky about some things, not about others. I can elaborate on my opinion, but I don't usually try to argue it. Or even defend it. I can explain why I think this is that, but I know as well as anybody that my opinion is formed from all sorts of squirrelly concepts, tastes, first impressions, and sometimes even bad info (ex: for years I thought the 1995 reprints were WotC's doing, when they weren't). But I also don't think my opinion needs to be rational. Heck, it's entirely possible the only reason I even liked D&D in the first place was because of the 1st Edition Easley painted covers.

 

Know what I mean? And by god, that's honesty right there. Because if my introduction to the game had been via the 1st Edition Sutherland covers, I'd probably never have taken to the game at all. It could literally come down to something as simple as that. Y'know, but that's life. It's all BS in the end, because nobody's opinion is fully rational anyway.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had to throw my 2cp in on this one. I bought the reprints of: PHB, MM, DMG, UA, DoD, and just got my hands on the newly released AtS.

 

All 6 are kept in their original shrink.

 

Yes, I bought these specifically for "collecting purposes." /me snorts.

 

Yes, I will be buying the Reprint White Box when it hits in November (Amazon has it the cheapest I have seen so far,) and I might actually pick up 2.

 

I have no plans on buying the 2nd Ed Reprints, but, with time, and when the cost goes down on them, I may reconsider.

 

One of the guys in my game group picked up the PHB and DMG, and he broke the shrink, so I was able to compare font and coloring.

 

I did not go into page by page specifics looking for differences, or added "errata." What DID mess with me is that when compared to my original books, its almost shocking to see the WHITE pages.

 

If you are looking for a literal side by side comparison, you can find it over here: http://www.acaeum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12227&hilit=wotc+reprint&start=200 With that being said, the comparison is being made against collectors grade books that are pristine. My books are all players copies, so the pages are yellowed.

 

The bookmark is nice, but all the stuff I commonly reference is either on my DM's screen, or I have memorized the pages (p79 of the DMG lists saving throw tables for PC's, for example)

 

I was happy to support the Gygax Memorial Fund with this, but, I had previously supported it when I bought the book that Gail released about Gary's life. (http://www.gygaxmemorialfund.org/merch/productlist/product/view/1/1) and had her sign it. :)

 

What aggrivated me as a collector was, when WotC released these, they did so under the guise that the original 3 were going to support the GMF, and they would only be able to be purchased through independant brick and mortar stores. Well, seeing that I bought mine through Amazon, that blew THAT theory out of the water, and I knew from that moment that any collectibility would be thrown out the window. Funds going to the GMF is fine, and I was happy with that, but I do not consider them to really be collectible at all.

 

I currently have all of these, in players copies, including a 4th Printing White box (with all supplements, original 3 books signed by EGG.)

 

As a collector, I don't think the reprints are gonna skyrocket in value....but I don't wanna flip through my ORIGINAL white box and supplements. I don't wanna use my signed Gygax books (MM, PHB, DMG) as my players copies, only to have someone dump a coke on them.

 

/me takes a breath

 

NK has always been decent to me, and I would continue to use them, however, I do think some of their stuff is overpriced. What hit me recently about them is that I also collect Castles and Crusades stuff. When I order direct from the trolls, I see the same book on NK a week later, for a fairly significant discount. Part of it is the fact that in order to keep my collections up to date, I usually buy stuff the day it is released, but I may need to rethink this strategy moving forward.

 

Finally, I dont think the brown books screwed up the game as much as UA did: ex: Weapon Specilization - turn your 1st level char into a meatgrinder, making encounters for your level almost negligible...then have every fighter type across the party do it....

 

...

 

Wow I kinda went off, huh???

 

All Hail Gygax!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I went over to the D&D Classics site to see if they had PDFs of the old rulebooks and what their rules on printing purchased PDFs were. I found that not only is the question of "can I print personal use copies" absent from their FAQ, but they also don't have any of the core rulebooks available. They have a bunch of the supplemental rulebooks, like the "Complete X" guides and things like Monster Manual II or Monstrous Compendium additions, but not the actual books required to play.

 

Kinda funny that the site's tagline is "Every edition available again!" when they don't actually offer the books you need to play. It's nice that they've got modules and other sourcebooks, but no core rules seems really dumb to me. But I guess they're hoping people buy the Premium books instead.

 

I also checked out that forum thread where they were comparing the originals to the premium reprints. I guess they added in some extra errors when they were going and redoing everything for the books. Someone over there said that the 1st Edition MM had Dwarves listed as 7HD creatures now. And the artwork has suffered the obvious "copy of a copy" issue in that most of it is darker than the originals and has lost some contrast. But that's to be expected when you've not got original copies to work with when doing a re-release.

Edited by Unruly
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think i must be a lone voice in the wilderness

 

I've loved every edition of D&D that I have played starting from Basic D&D in 1980 through the whole BECMI thing into AD&D by 1984 then Rules Cyclopedia and 2E in 1991 (yes I like to adopt systems years after they come out - I figure by that point there is plenty of adventures and supplements out and I am an adventure/supplement junkie). When 3E hit in 2000 I had mostly stopped playing D&D and was into Magic and Warhammer (RPG and tabletop) but 3E was really exciting for me. I only reluctantly went to 3.5 (and likely wouldn't have if I hadn't found a really good deal on the core books) as i was still loving 3E. 3.5 cleaned up some things but screwed up others and the power creep and prep time started to become a real headache for me.

 

By 2008 I was more than ready for something really different and boy did 4E deliver different! I played the heck out of it and found DMing it a breeze (especially once they had a functional monster builder program - sadly that was killed when both the Character Builder and Monster Builder went online-only - what a colossal f-up THAT was!). By 2011 I was again losing interest in RPGs but it was being replaced by boardgames. I eventually started up a Pathfinder game that has been running for about a year now but i find mostly I have little interest in RPGs would rather play boardgames or paint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone over there said that the 1st Edition MM had Dwarves listed as 7HD creatures now.

 

I think that statement was put out by Frank Mentzer (one of the guys who wrote this stuff, Temple of Elemental Evil comes to mind.)

 

If you think that errata was bad, you should check out the history on Deities and Demigods. It's pretty interesting.

 

If memory serves, its something like:

 

1st print : Cthulu and Elric Mythos are in the book. Moorcock said "you didn't pay us, take it out."

 

2nd print: No Elric. Cthulu says "You didn't pay us, take it out."

 

3rd Print: Cthulu still in, a special thank you is listed to them in the book credits. They say, again, "TAKE IT OUT."

 

4th Print: Cthulu out, but the special thank you to them is left in.

 

I think it took them to the 4th or 5th printing before they got it "right."

 

Link found, I was slightly incorrect, but that still is *kinda* what happened: http://www.acaeum.com/ddindexes/setpages/deities.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I'm aware of how much a book can change throughout its numerous printings. I just thought it was funny that the new Premium version of the AD&D 1st Edition Monster Manual has dwarves listed as a 7 HD creature when it should be 1.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I'm aware of how much a book can change throughout its numerous printings. I just thought it was funny that the new Premium version of the AD&D 1st Edition Monster Manual has dwarves listed as a 7 HD creature when it should be 1.

Are we sure that Wildbill didn't have something to do with this printing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Someone over there said that the 1st Edition MM had Dwarves listed as 7HD creatures now.

I think that statement was put out by Frank Mentzer (one of the guys who wrote this stuff, Temple of Elemental Evil comes to mind.)

 

If you think that errata was bad, you should check out the history on Deities and Demigods. It's pretty interesting.

 

If memory serves, its something like:

 

1st print : Cthulu and Elric Mythos are in the book. Moorcock said "you didn't pay us, take it out."

 

I'd heard that ultimately it was TSR itself that decided to take them out. Chaosium interpreted a licensing agreement made with Moorcock's agent as being exclusive, but was willing to let TSR keep printing it as long as Chaosium was acknowledged and credited, which for a time it was (I have a copy with both the Melnibonian and Cthulhu mythos as well as the thank you to Chaosium under Credits and Acknowledgements on page 4. After a change in TSR management, TSR decided it did not want to be giving free advertising for its competitor, and at that point yanked the material. Honestly, most readers probably did not notice the thank you...it was only two lines at the bottom of page 4....

 

I remember being so disappointed when I got my first copy in the 80's and the two mythos were missing after having drooled over a friend's copy that had them. Finally scored a copy with both mythos and in excellent condition from the used book box at my FLGS last year for $19.

Edited by badocter
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd heard that ultimately it was TSR itself decided to take them out. Chaosium interpreted a licensing agreement made with Moorcock's agent as being exclusive, but was willing to let TSR keep printing it as long as Chaosium was acknowledged and credited, which for a time it was (I have a copy with both the Melnibonian and Cthulhu mythos as well as the thank you to Chaosium under Credits and Acknowledgements on page 4. After a change in TSR management, TSR decided it did not want to be giving free advertising for its competitor, and at that point yanked the material. Honestly, most readers probably did not notice the thank you...it was only two lines at the bottom of page 4....

 

You are correct, Sir. :)

 

Finally scored a copy with both mythos and in excellent condition from the used book box at my FLGS last year for $19.

 

THAT is a nice grab.

 

I spent 25 on mine at a Gencon auction, and the thing is utterly DESTROYED. Like: "You don't know what the book is by looking at the side binding, because it isnt THERE-type destroyed." Still 1st Print, 1st Ed, but from a collecting standpoint, almost worthless. I have been watching ebay for one in nicer shape, though.... Someday....

 

I still remember how happy I was to get FF for less than 90 bucks...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By R2ED
      I can't begin to tell you how excited i am that my parents found these in the basement in some supplies i had stored.  These are Ral Partha models from 1988 to 1991. I bought them with my allowance back when i was like 9 or 10 and am thrilled to see these again.  I remember being so afraid to paint them because i didn't want to mess them up, that i never ever tried.  
       
      These are primed and need to be stripped. These are early pewter-white metal.  They even had packaging that read "now lead free". 
       
      What I'm wanting to do is savor the joy of painting them, now that I'm way more capable.  However...i need to get this crappy primer off of them.  These are 30+ years old and I'm blown away they look as good as they do.  
       
      Anyone have a solution that can strip this down to the metal? 

    • By StarFyre
      is that true though?  why wouldnt it be huge if the base determines that?
       
      Wizkids, who does the official D&D models (in line with the models from GF9 that are also official) have a line of dragons coming, starting in dec/jan, that they said are their new gargantuan dragons and described them as properly sized or something .    
      Here's a pic of the first, the white:
       
      https://www.enworld.org/attachments/f53d5c97-bd1f-4dc4-b29c-ba25bced7bcd-jpeg.123086/
       
      Maker: Wizkids / Wizards of the Coast Brand: Icons of the Realms Set: Gargantuan White Dragon, Arveiaturace Date Released: Jan 2021  
      really like the greek set. so nice!!
       
      regards,

      Sanjay
    • By Orlando_the_Technicoloured
      Dungeons & Lasers Second Edition prelaunch page

      https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/archonstudio/dungeons-and-lasers-second-edition/









      -The 2nd campaign will offer products from the 1st campaign as well (called Legacy Products) with an option for shipping within a month from the end of 2nd ed Kickstarter. So ultra-fast, in the scale of Kickstarter, delivery.

      - 6 YES! that's 6 Dragons as a single pack or to buy individually, or as a free stretch goal with your terrain pledge! Please give us feedback in the questionnaire about prices! Link to the questionnaire at the bottom of the update.


      Here are 4 dragons out of 6! and yes that DnD miniature is in scale (28mm). More pictures below.
      Currently, we have only planned to make fantasy themed dragons! Please convince us in the comments to make one in a Sci-Fi theme (please! I need good arguments to convince the boss!)

      -optional half-walls - we are making, as we speak (see video), 1st test tool for half-walls, this was requested by you in the post-KS questionnaire. Half-walls will be an OPTIONAL buy (or selected in the pledge manager instead of 50mm ones, we are still working on it). Cost of it - as it will be optional we will make it as close to manufacturing costs as legally possible!

      - as requested, we will be also making a large tool with end-half-clips, available to purchase for manufacturing cost / or will be part of a stretch goal, no only that we have some ideas for clips supporting next tier (more to come in next updates), this option will allow you to build easily several dungeon levels.

      - 3 more themes, 2 fantasy Dwarven Mine, Cursed Cathedral, and Temple of the Operators. )and POSSIBLY MORE?








      - All new stretch goals! We are aiming to DOUBLE the number of stretch goals to 1st DnL Kickstarter! Yes, twice more!



      - Pre-launch Stretch goals! : For the first time, we are introducing Pre-Launch Stretch Goals. The more folks subscribe to our Pre-Page on Kickstarter, LINK: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/archonstudio/dungeons-and-lasers-second-edition the more free items we are adding to the pledges! Head on to our KS page and click "subscribe"! Make sure your friends know about and share the link: archon-studio.com/dnl2



      We want to make as the best deal for backers as possible, thus, we need your feedback and support about DnL 2.0 here is the link to the new questionnaire:

      https://archon-studio.com/content/dungeons-lasers-second-edition-early-survey

      You will find more information on our blog here: https://archon-studio.com/blog/dungeons-lasers-second-edition




      they did the rapid delivery of existing stuff for their previous terrain KS and it worked well, and came in on time, and their plastic is pretty good so if you like the look of it well worth considering

      also do sign up for KS notification as that's going to help backers get more stuff!
       
    • By Firestar
      My first Wyvern. :)
    • By MoonglowMinis
      Hi everyone.  Got a couple more demons for you today.  This is a pair of Bones Fly Demons for use as Chasme in D&D.  These guys could also serve double duty as Giant Flies for Rangers of Shadow Deep.
       

       
      More Below the Spoiler:
       
      Feel free to check out more of my demons and devils in my Blood War project HERE.

      If anyone has any leads on other interesting giant fly minis please share them, as I've been finding it difficult to find good models for RoSD.

      Also, how do you paint insect wings?  They're such a unique feature in the animal kingdom and I'd love to see how you go about it?
  • Who's Online   17 Members, 0 Anonymous, 35 Guests (See full list)


×
×
  • Create New...