Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Dan Goodchild

Living in the Future

Recommended Posts

4,000 mph in a maglev capsule in a single, continent-wide hope-it's-flawless unleaking vacuum tube?

 

You first.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All air would be removed from the tube system to eliminate friction and we are told that human passengers would only feel the G-forces they already experience in a traditional vehicle.

How exactly are they going to bypass physics? I don't remember a lot from science class, but I'm pretty sure that gravity still exists in a vacuum. :unsure:

 

Edit - I think I get it... the acceleration would be a flat increase over several minutes. I'd guess it'd take around 10 minutes to get the module moving to 4000 mph w/out putting undue G's on the passengers.

 

 

A few other issues I see:

  • I doubt it'll end up being as cheap as they claim b/c they'll need tons of space to load and unload each tube. Pretty much an airport's worth of space.
  • The first time some drunk-driver crashes into a support pole there's going to be issues. If some kind of safety system doesn't stop every car in that tube at that split second, at the exact same speed, there'll be a crash and casualties.
  • And if they do all stop instantaneously, what's the effect on the human body of going from 4000 to 0 in a split second. I'd imagine that your safety harness would just cut you in half.
  • And what about the effects of weather on the tubes? I'd expect that they'd expand and contract during extremes.
Edited by Chrome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is where the maglev comes in. Most pipes are sealed air tight - so the view might suck on one of these if it is completely closed off.

 

Seems like a good idea tho :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maglev to keep it aloft. Air removed to reduce air friction on something moving 4,000 mph.

 

Not sure how they say they can develop all of the tech, acquire right of way, and perform construction for 25% of the cost of a highway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4,000 mph in a maglev capsule in a single, continent-wide hope-it's-flawless unleaking vacuum tube?

 

You first.

 

I'd prefer George Jetson's vacuum tube transport system. For that matter (like Chrome) I want one of those flying cars...

 

jetsons-jane-driving-lesson-sm.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit - I think I get it... the acceleration would be a flat increase over several minutes. I'd guess it'd take around 10 minutes to get the module moving to 4000 mph w/out putting undue G's on the passengers.

For fun:

1 mph = 0.5 m/s, so this is 2000 m/s or so.

Sports car 0-60 mph in 6 sec is 30 m/s acceleration in 6 s or 5 m/s/s (0.5 g).

At that rate, 0-4000 mph takes 400 s (7 minutes) and covers some 400 km (250 mi).

Then you can sit at a steady speed for about 40 minutes, covering another 2700 mi.

Then decelerate at 0.5 g (gentle relative to cars) to a stop.

3200 miles in 54 minutes at sports car accelerations.

 

If you kept to only 0.25 g (0-60 in 12 sec), acceleration would take 800 s (13 minutes) and cover 500 mi. With 33 minutes of cruise and then deceleration, this is 3200 miles in 59 minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SaintRigger, on 15 Jul 2013 - 2:52 PM, said:

Except maybe emergency stopping - I'm curious about that part.

 

4000 MPH leaves a hell of a skid.

200km at 1g, 20km at a not-really-survivable 10g. There is no emergency stopping in any traditional sense, but with a signal system (like on existing trains) they could stop within a hundred miles or so with a few minutes notice.

 

The bigger problem may be energy dissipation. The ends of the line are going to need to be heavily built so that the magnets can deal with the reaction force from acceleration/deceleration. Unless the system is similarly built throughout, the magnets in the middle may not be sufficiently anchored to stop the train.

 

[400t of train (small TGV) at 2000 m/s is a kinetic energy just under 1 TJ. Dissipating that over 200km, you get something like 5 MJ per meter -- roughly a side-by-side line of tractor-trailers crashing into the magnets at highway speed. (Wikipedia claims 1 MJ is 2 tonnes at 72 mph, so a 3-meter-wide 36 tonne truck would produce 5 MJ/m impact at about 50 mph.) That sort of structure seems doable, but will require a fair bit of maintenance and monitoring.]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's overhyping it. It doesn't need to be continent wide and 4000 mph to be useful.

 

LA to SF or NYC to Washington DC at 750mph would be enough to create radical changes in thinking. For that matter, Denver to the major ski areas at 350mph would be quite useful as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

According to Musk, the system would only need 1/20th the amount of materials as a high-speed rail line and cost 1/10th as much to build.

Interesting. A fully-enclosed, airtight tube needs 1/20th the materials of a pair of metal rails...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By emmagine
      We are doing a video tutorial series on how we have been painting figures.   The past couple years we have been working out a way for those who are inept (like me) and those who are adept (like Christie) to be able to paint figures fast, and well enough that they look good in person and in a photo.   We have made substantial progress incorporating and modifying techniques we have learned from others (many on these forums,  classes at reaper-con, etc.) Here is out latest video,  step two of our pre-shading process.  Feedback and questions always welcome! 
       
    • By Kheprera
      I'm looking at picking up some tube paints for basic colors to start trying and wanted to just get five basic colors. What would be the best colors to pick up?
       
      Also, was thinking of going with Liquitex, but have never tried these kinds of paints before, so if anyone has any ideas on brands to suggest, I'm listening.
       
       
      Cadmium Yellow (Deep)
      Titanium White
      Burnt Umber
      Cerulean Blue
      Alizarin Crimson or Cadmium Red (Deep)
      Possibly also Mars Black
       
      Was also looking at the Iridescent Effects to add.
       
      I plan on using these to paint my larger models (lots of dragons).
       
      Also, is there a different primer I should consider as well?
    • By smokingwreckage
      So... I am painting these because I am insane:
      Two different approaches to getting this far, same outcome. Basecoat grey then wash, basecoat Brown Liner then drybrush. Hats are the Mook ID System with each pose/weapon getting a different coloured hat from others of the identical pose/kit. Shields will get some decoration and there will be some variation in leather, armour and cloth.


    • By Kharsin
      Hey All! This was tonight's "project." I am not a fast painter. I've never had to be, and tend to enjoy taking the time to accomplish something beautiful. However, there was this goblin staring at me that's been primed for several, several months now. So I decided to give myself 1.5hours to see what I could accomplish. Again this doesn't seem like anything approaching speed, but I've been giving some thought to commissions and if I'm ever going to attempt something like that, I will have to gain speed. 
       
      SO! I guess I'm asking what grade you guys would consider this? Too fast? Not enough detail? Too much detail? I really have no idea as I've always just painted for fun and for beauty. This guy is obviously pretty hideous, having several flash lines and various spots I'd normally spend lots of time removing and filing. I'm not very skilled at slapping paint on, dropping the brush, and walking away... Suggestions?
       

       

       

       
      Please excuse the horrible lighting. I don't have my normal equipment set up. I NEED to set it up as I still need to post the excellent Spring Exchange I received as well as the Dino Guy when he's finished.
       
      -K
       
      P.S.: He does contain some of the legendary color known as: "Drow Nipple Pink" LOL!
    • By TGP
      Dexterity
       
      It is one of the core stats for old D&D. It covers juggling ability, sleight-of-hand, reflexes, lock picking, speed, agility, dodging, all things to do with speed and motion even aiming.
       
      But I got to thinking about it and I wondered why all those things were automatically lumped together.
       
       
      17 Dex
       
      That is a high score: Consider a Tree-Sloth: it is incredibly agile - 17 makes sense; its hands (and feet!) display tremendous dexterity - 17, sure; but is if fast? no, it should get a 4-5 Dex when considering its speed.
       
      Consider a Gnomish Clockmaker: very, very, good with his hands - 17 makes sense; but only average agility (10 Dex?); not very fast with the short legs (7 Dex?); might be a deadly shot with a clockwork crossbow - back to 17 for aiming again.

       
      Human Acrobats - could easily be good at juggling, sleight-of-hand, reflexes, tumbling, agility, dodging; but might not run so fast or be any good with fiddly tasks wanting fine motor skill like picking locks or adjusting clocks.
      :upside:
       
      _______________
       
       
      Has anybody else run into this sort of conundrum or made adjustments to the rules of their RPG to address this kind of thing?
       
  • Who's Online   15 Members, 1 Anonymous, 63 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...