Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I can't like this. I was took annoyed by the last movie. And just generally annoyed by the fact that that.... person took what should have been at most a two movie book and turned it into three.

 

Of course, calling him a person insults all the other persons on the planet, but the forums are family friendly so I can't call him what I really think of him.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm on the other side of the fence with this one.  But then again, I'm not a guardian of the text (I wasn't sure why Tom Bombadil needed to exist).  That's not to say that I'm not a fan of the text (full disclosure, I read all of the appendices, but did get bored in the Silmarillian).

 

I was extremely skeptical about the splitting of The Hobbit (I figured that there was barely enough material for one film there).  After watching it, I decided that Peter Jackson did an excellent job of adapting some incredibly difficult material.  And including so much appendix story line (and moving it to where it is dramatically relevant) convinced me that they could justify the screen time (unlike a certain splitting of a Harry Potter book so that the entire film takes place in a tent).

 

I do like how they've given motivations and personalities to the Dwarves, for example.  And character arcs for characters other than the hobbits- those have been nice additions.  Oh, and changing the confrontation with Sauron so that it doesn't happen off screen where you sort of hear about it from Gandolf when he tells Frodo in Fellowship of the Ring- yep, way better to show that.

 

But I understand that there's no real pleasing true guardians of the text.

Edited by odinsgrandson
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Those changes aren't a bother to me. It's the complete character changes of folks like Elrond the bother the heck out of me, even the adition of Legolas to the Hobbit movies didn't bother me much, it was a good tie together of the two, but yeah...some of the changes really just got under my skin more than others. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Elrond?  He pretty much matches what I read in the Lord of the Rings.

 

Now, the Hobbit is a different world- I remember the elves of Rivendel were comical.  I'm not convinced that the books take place in the same setting, and reconciling The Hobbit to the established Middle Earth setting is also a feat of adaptation.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't consider myself a guardian of the text, but I like a good story and I hate a crummy story.

 

The bloated, imbalanced, Hollywoodified, fictionalized, insulting-to-dwarves trilogy of movies is a crummy story.

 

The book had more nuance, subtletly, and meaning. And way better characterization.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Elrond came across as a big jerk to me in the movies, which was something I never took from the character in the books. But that's my take on it. I'm biased. I'm really looking forward to the final installment of The Hobbit. It means that Jackson will be out of Tolkien IP to modify, and given his family's open opinions on the film adaptations I don't foresee them turning loose of any more of it. 

 

I'm glad that a lot of people seem to love the movies, and wish them happy watching. Cheers. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Elrond of the books was a wise, resigned, forgiving sort of person, whereas in the movies he was bitter, angry, and blameful. The dwarves in the movies are mostly ridiculous, whereas in the books the only one that is truly ridiculous is the fat one (Bomfur? iirc) and even he has his moments.

 

Jackson stripped away all the humourous moments, replacing them Gimli the Idiot Dwarf and Merry and Pippin the Two Clown Hobbits. The movies ended up being rather melodramatic. I laughed out loud in the theater when Galadriel did her whole Dark Queen speech to Frodo; probably not the effect they were going for there.

 

As for the point of Tom Bombadil, what's the point of anyone you met along the way of an adventure? Bombadil saved them from themselves when they got lost in the woods and again in the hills. If LotRs was a recounting of DnD adventure Bombadil was a powerful NPC the DM had save his idiot PCs when they were just starting out. Because Tolkien wanted him in the story, that's the point, and it was his story =P

 

Also, the eagles were busy when they set out, that's why. =P

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I always took the point of Bombadil, who was one of my favorite characters in the story, to be that there were older and more powerful than Sauron, forces for GOOD in middle earth. Up until that point in the story it seems like there can be no respite from evil, Gandalf is afraid to take the ring due to it's corrupting influence, the elves are too distant to help and everywhere evil is closing in. Yes, Bombadil is like a shaft of sunlight that shines through the storm clouds. Only there for a moment perhaps, but long enough to show you that there is a sun still shining above the darkness and that gives you hope.

 

These movies were not made for fans, they were made to draw the masses and their money in. I had to tell myself that during the LotR trilogy, although it was somewhat easier to bear as those movies as least tried to stay faithful to the story. So far it has been quite the challenge to remind myself of this during the Hobbit trilogy.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

My biggest grip (of which there are many) is that dwarves in the new movies are born with one of two genetic pre-dispositions. Comedically clumsy to the point of insulting (Dominant) or so brooding and proud they're almost ignorant (recessive).

 

So much I don't like that's been "enhanced" or adapted, yet I can't stop myself from getting hopeful about the next movie. Probably because my brain is whiskey-infused oatmeal with floating neurons desperately shouting at each other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

. Probably because my brain is whiskey-infused oatmeal with floating neurons desperately shouting at each other.

You should lay off the oatmeal then. Too much mush.

 

Might be a good idea to lay off the whiskey too. Since, you know, it's technically poison. :rock:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, he's the one who said his brain was whiskey-infused oatmeal; alcohol in moderation isn't a bad thing, but when your neurons are floating in it, it might be time to cut back a bit. Maybe put something else in there. Hot chocolate maybe. Or steak and mashed taters. Something with substance. Dwarves, alcoholics though they be, should approve of substance =P

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just despise how they thought they needed to write in characters.  Not to improve the story, just to improve the demographics.  I understand that women are thin on the ground in Tolkien but writting in ham fisted attempts is worse.  They did it in The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.  I detect a definite lack of understanding by the writers in all of these movies about what makes Tolkien's characters interesting.  Everything in Middle Earth is a product of a deep and interesting history, including the way characters act.  For this reason I found Arwen's increased role to be far less annoying than Tauriel.  At least Arwen is still an elf, still has understandable motivations and might be deeper than a puddle.  Tauriel is a vapid and worthless character.  She is a hot girl that fights and immediately falls deeply in love for no reason.  She acts completely against what should motivate her character.  She is a prop.  I get that she was written in for the female audience but why would women like her?  I'm pretty sure they don't but maybe I'm wrong.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By 72moonglum
      Hello all you denizens of Reapershire!
       
      So been working a little bit more on some Bones V goodness, and today I finished the Female Halfling from the Dungeon Dwellers set:
       

       

       
      As always, couldn't choose colors, but once I got the colors figured out, it was pretty smooth sailing from there.  I have a little bit of flash issues, it seems that plastic flash works a bit differently than metal. I am seemingly merciless with metal flash, but too cautious with the Bones material, but I don't know if that can be noticed or not here.  In any case, enjoy and have a very nice weekend!
    • By R2ED
      Someone say painting weekend?
       
      Got another one in, but sadly it's not one of the Reapers.  I purchased a cool, little Hobbit a few weeks back and the printer sent me this one that was a bad mold, but I ended up making something out of it.  What looks wrong with it you ask?  Well, for one, the details got a little sloppy.  The barrel he's on got halved in printing, his face looks like he's a stroke survivor - his left side of his face is sloped big time. I tried correcting it in the painting, but it's pretty noticiable.  There's some big gaps between the hobbit and the barrel.  Oh well - it made for a good color study.
       
      I stuck to Orange Brown, Chocolate Brown, Light Sand, Yellow, GW Nuln Oil, GW Agrax Earthshade, Stone Grey, Fair Skin, Fair Shadow, Flat Brown.  If it's not clear already - the goal was browns.
       
      BATTLE REPORT!
       
      Wins:
      * I think the shirt in that orange/cream cuffs came out pretty decent.  Went over it with a wash and brought more depth to the lines with brown diluted.  Win.
      *  Face was a mess, but considering how sloped it was, I think it wasn't too bad.
      *  Mug foam isn't terrible.  Isn't great, but first time doing foam.
      *  Barrel colors look dark and separated from the other tones.
       
      Misses:
      * Eyes on this one were such a pain!  Big miss.
      *  Lips look like he's about dead with how much he's drunk.  I couldn't go in to give them a more natural color after a few tries I just gave in because the paint was layering up and was going to distort the look further.
      *  Mug wasn't my favorite.  I got into it a bit, but lost the momentum to finish the rings around the mug.  It also hit me after I was cleaning up that this was a tankard with a top with foam flowing out, not just a foam overflow.  May need to go back to fix that.  Boo.
      *  Hair was better than I have done on some of the others.  I made it with a 3 color setup, but it still looks...washed out.  At least it has depth and better than before, but still hate doing hair.
       
      Without further excuses - here's Pippin sippin' and slippin with his foamy mug drippin.  
       
      Always good for feedback if you've got any to give.
       
       


    • By R2ED
      Trying something a little different this time.  I've got a friend who loves JRR Tolkein and I thought he'd really appreciate a little diorama.  Since I have to ship this, I need it small and durable.  
       
      Now, I get it that Bilbo's sword Sting glows bright when Goblins are near, but let's just say for this story it's glowing because danger is close.  I have him in the stone henge area with a Wraith King coming around the bend.  Let's just say this is about to get real...
       
      Starting this on some foam board.  I was going to use some chip board, but didn't want the glue and stuff I'd be using for the base to get soaked in and bend.  
       
      Using the extruded foam core for the stones.  Carving them down was pretty fun.  I'm thinking I might add some runes or something into them.  I haven't primed them yet, so I still have time.  
       
      The ground terrain is kind of fun - I used spackle, glue, sand, and some burnt umber paint.  I'll do some grass and floral additions to it. You can see on one of the pillars that I used a different mix to surround the stone.  That was the filler without the paint added.  
       
      For the circles, I'll be leaving those open to put the minis into and can be taken out on their own.  I'll be basing them to match the surrounding area, but Iike the idea of taking them out of the diorama when wanted.
       
      Open for any and all suggestions here.  We're still far from done.  





    • By R2ED
      I need some help people.  I've got a hobbit down to the last 25% to get the painting done.  
       
      I need to try my hand at nmm and this is the one.  Sting is a magnificent sword that glows blue when goblins are near.  I need some guidance on how to make this happen. 
       
      Give me some inspiration, folks. 
       
       


    • By 72moonglum
      Hello guys and gals!
       
      so this is the first figure I ever painted, even though these aren't that version.  The first version, which is actually the one you see below that was painted first years ago, is actually the original stripped version that I would have painted when is was probably about twelve.  The original one was painted in model enamel colors, with pink skin, yellow hair and shirts, green paints and I think grey cloak.  I ended up getting back into minis again way back and stripped him before I knew about EBay and was able to get a second copy.  So here's the one I just finished painted a few nights ago:
       

       
      and here's the one I painted I think in about 2004:
       

       
      and here they are together:
       

       
      So anyways, just thought it would be fun to post, now I'm off to go make some organic pancakes for breakfast!
       
      Enjoy!
       
       
  • Who's Online   15 Members, 0 Anonymous, 40 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...