Jump to content

Guildenstern

photography help - what's wrong with this picture?

Recommended Posts

I try to photo with daylight and a flash with a softbox pointed 45 or higher. I like macro lenses too.

Here's an old photo I did.. I haven't taken pictures of anything recently but setting the white balance mode, using a tripod and a remote to minimize shaking, and a good flash and macro lens get your pretty far.

AssaultInfantry.jpg

Edited by 4tonmantis
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, for your next experiment, you might want to consider this: that shot has the out of focus background look indicating a relatively open aperture setting. You might like to try either using a background that doesn't -almost- look like something while out of focus, i.e. something more abstract and less like a tree, OR maximizing the depth lf field by closing down the aperture to the tightest setting and trying to get it in focus, which is more like the way our eyes would perceive the scene if we were 30mm tall.

 

You've got the white balance thing down....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Guildenstern

 

I use my room light(regular light bulb) and two small lamps that came with a light box my wife gave me for Christmas.  While of course better lights will help, I think you would be pleasantly surprised just by changing the background to something other than white.  Grays work well from what I have read on the forums here.  Personally I printed a background I found with my Googlefoo and I tape it to my backdrop, since for some reason the light box didn't come with any neutrally colored back drops.

Edited by JDizzO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: Hancock Fabrics is closing. This means HUGE sales.

 

They sell OttLights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@4tonmantis:

 

The image you posted was lit primarily from high on camera left. The result is that the front of the figure and especially the camera left sides of both subjects are underexposed. Recommend using two lights of about the same power, one to either side of the subject, and moving the lights down so they shine directly on the front of the subject.

 

Also, what Rob Dean said about the background is dead on: The complex patterns of the OOF background are distracting from the subjects. A simpler background will work better.

 

If you really want a complex background, going to a small aperture is unlikely to help much when using a macro lens. The lens to subject distance is so much shorter than the lens to background distance that you probably can't get the background in any sort of focus while maintaining focus on the figure. To some extent, this can be mitigated by using a very short lens like the one in a cell phone, but even there, the difference in distances (and short distance to subject) will limit total depth of field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, for your next experiment, you might want to consider this: that shot has the out of focus background look indicating a relatively open aperture setting. You might like to try either using a background that doesn't -almost- look like something while out of focus, i.e. something more abstract and less like a tree, OR maximizing the depth lf field by closing down the aperture to the tightest setting and trying to get it in focus, which is more like the way our eyes would perceive the scene if we were 30mm tall.

 

You've got the white balance thing down....

 

That's a macro lens.. that's how they take pictures..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must admit I don't own a macro lens...what focal length and highest aperture number have you got?

 

Oh, I think I miscommunicated.. I am not presently seeking photography help. I was offering assistance to the person in front of me. Macro lenses go with miniature photography like peanut butter with jelly IMO. I personally like soft focus but I realize Bokeh style photography is not for everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By BLZeebub
      I started this in a WIP and have finally finished my first background for taking pictures.  This one is made with fairly lightweight watercolor paper.  I taped it down tight, primed with gesso, and built up from light to dark layers (all cheap craft paints).  The concept was for the whole thing to appear nebulous, as a dark cloud with obscured lighter flashes.  I think it turned out pretty close to my vision.  The half-painted creatures are just my first test shot with the background.  My phone camera did occasionally try to focus on the background, so on the next attempt (some kind of brighter theme) I will try to soften the edges (paint started to dapple on the blacks and grays).  What do you think?
       
      WIP here:  http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/83003-attempting-to-paint-generic-backgrounds-for-miniature-photography/&tab=comments#comment-1760821
       
      For those curious, the bug is primed in Reaper brush on primer, black, and it's carapace has two coats of Golden's Interference (purple-green) paint.  Boxy is clean Bones, primed with Brown Liner with Old West Rose fleshy bits.  They'll get their own WIP soon.


    • By Genghis_Sean
      I recall reading an excellent tutorial a long time ago regarding how best to shoot one's finished minis, but I've been unable to find it.  I largely suck at it.  I'd like to acquire a background against which to shoot, and I don't know from where I could purchase one.  I need to know what kind of lighting is best.  I think I read that you need at least two light sources, and I wondered if a certain kind of bulb was best.  If anybody has the link to that tutorial, I'd like to go over it.  Thanks.
    • By Pingo
      NSFW link: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/jul/09/thousands-strip-naked-in-hull-for-spencer-tunick-photographs
       
      3200 British volunteers took off their clothes and were painted four shades of blue and photographed in the streets of Hull as part of an art project by American photographer Spencer Tunick.
       
      Tunick specializes in large photographs of crowds of nude people. The blue color is symbolic of Hull's relationship to the river and the sea.
       
      I was amazed at the cheerful volunteerism exhibited -- the models are unpaid -- and the sheer variety of people participating. It seems to me an eye-opening sample of what regular people look like naked (well, partly, since in this project each person is painted monochrome).
    • By Pingo
      I just found a nice secondhand photography book which reminded me that if you are looking for visual references for city streets & alleys, the photography of Bob Thall is extraordinary.
       
      It's mostly black-and-white, but he examines details of the urban environment that most other photographers gloss over.
    • By knarthex
      Hey all!
      (I heard that groan!)
      Yes, George is back to pick your collective little grey cells again!
       
      I have heard that people are using photo shop and such to change the images of figures they are painting to black and white to improve their high lights. Now, I don't have that capability atm, but I can have the Camera do this, I just need to take extra photos...
       
      So I am going to post some B&W  photos of current WiPs and ask people to comment on the photos as to where I need to high light / shade.
       
      First up, Vourgha the Ogre:

       
      Next, the Vulture Demon

      (Use the images from the WIPS with the same date)
       
      As I look at the pictures, it looks to me as if there are no high lights at all! Now I believe this to be untrue, as when I look at the color images, I can see the high lights, and I darn sure know that I painted them!
       
      This is what I mean by needing help with using this tool. (Any military ex Photo ops specialists out there?)
      Also, would it be easier to do if I put the color image side by side, (top & Bottom), or is the black and white image enough?
       
      Thanks all!
      8)
      George
       
      Mods, I believe that this is the right place for this, but I have been wrong before....
      I Can't post photos on the shutter bug area, and the whole discussion is worthless without them...
  • Who's Online   33 Members, 0 Anonymous, 101 Guests (See full list)

×