Jump to content

Heisler

MSP Open Judging - What you were afraid to ask

Recommended Posts

It's worthwhile to note that judging any form of art has this problem.  I come from the world of dance, and I've been privy to similar conversations.  The Olympics has their problems judging things like figure skating and gymnastic routines.  Judging anything in a subjective manner has these issues.  It's not like we have mini-painting death match (and no, that's not a challenge for next year's ReaperCon!). 

 

Heisler has written a really good piece, and hopefully competitors will take the words to heart. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't participate in the competitions this year. But I do have a question:

 

- Does the detail level of the mini itself have a noticeable impact? In this sense I mean comparing a Reaper metal cast mini vs a Reaper Bones mini whose details are not as pronounced or sharp as its metal counterpart. Some of the original Bones 1 models (i.e. the Noseless Horrors) are literally disfigured right out of the box. In other words, what if you got an ugly mini?

 

And I'm also grateful to see everyone else here on the boards discuss their own results and what they learned:

- Push the contrasts even more! No, even more than that. MORE, I SAY!

- Consider the light source when taking the contrast into account. Usually brighter at the top of the model, and darker on the ground level.

- Smooooooth blendings.

- And you've just mentioned thin paint fares better than thick paint.

Edited by Cranky Dog
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting, Thanks for posting this Heisler. A lot to think on for us who enter reaper or any other competition.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well put, Kris.

 

As someone with a fair bit of experience in both judging and being judged in a variety of arts, little of this is a surprise...but it's incredibly good information to have laid out in plain terms.

 

I think the only time I've disagreed with any judging I've received at Rcon has been...well, every time I've entered, the judges have chosen a piece other than the one I expected them to judge. But the scores I've received have been pretty in line with my expectations.

 

Thanks for putting this up for the forums!

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm.......

 

You mention training the judges how to score an entry. I'm curious if you have a specific set of painted figures you use to visually provide an example of each "level" of painting for the judges to reference while training or during the scoring of the entries?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't participate in the competitions this year. But I do have a question:

 

- Does the detail level of the mini itself have a noticeable impact? In this sense I mean comparing a Reaper metal cast mini vs a Reaper Bones mini whose details are not as pronounced or sharp as its metal counterpart. Some of the original Bones 1 models (i.e. the Noseless Horrors) are literally disfigured right out of the box. In other words, what if you got an ugly mini?

 

And I'm also grateful to see everyone else here on the boards discuss their own results and what they learned:

- Push the contrasts even more! No, even more than that. MORE, I SAY!

- Consider the light source when taking the contrast into account. Usually brighter at the top of the model, and darker on the ground level.

- Smooooooth blendings.

- And you've just mentioned thin paint fares better than thick paint.

 

This is a tough question. A well cast and detailed piece is just easier to paint and its likely just going to be easy to achieve good results on. Its really hard to do competition level work on a piece that is less well defined casting. The round about answer is yes, you can do well with an ugly mini but you have to be willing to do the work and its going to take more work than a well cast piece. Beyond the dragons there were a number of Bones minis in the competition that did very well this year. Except for possibly the youth entries you probably couldn't have told the difference unless you knew about it. I have scored 1st place trophies with some less than stellar historical miniatures over the years so it can certainly be done.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pfft, a poorly molded model is a great opportunity to be creative. Have a really ugly dent in the thigh of a giant from the metal not settling? Instant scar.

 

I wonder if there are kudos for cover ups like that.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm.......

 

You mention training the judges how to score an entry. I'm curious if you have a specific set of painted figures you use to visually provide an example of each "level" of painting for the judges to reference while training or during the scoring of the entries?

 

Its not training in the same way that you are thinking. Its more about making sure they have an open mind about techniques and the quality of work. For instance Banshee's blending style (a European painter for those of you unfamiliar with his work) is quite loose and is not the same smooth blending that so many of us try to achieve. If we had figures to consult against we would have to select an artist to paint those figures and then we would be boxing ourselves into that artist's style for everything. So the whole thing is rather nebulous. Or we would have to go to some kind of check of system like GW uses to get through their first cut judging. Did they use more than three colors on the base, did they use more than three colors on the mini, etc. If I had example figures I would have to have one for almost every technique you could think of, that would be a lot of minis!

 

I think the hardest thing to train or teach  judges, especially when we first introduce this judging style at Reaper Con, is that there can be more than one gold medal. There is that first impulse to equate gold with 1st place and that is not the case in an Open competition. If there are 49 gold medals in the room then we will give out 49 gold medals. We can reward those painters that have shown the skills to paint at that level and not have to narrow it down to the top three, when we do that then we have to look at what a painter did wrong more than what they did right. We have to enlighten judges to the concept that just because they don't like a technique like drybrushing that it is still a valid technique and when its done well it should be rewarded. When you are wavering between a bronze and silver or a silver and a gold either go with the higher score or have a consult on the piece with another judge. Formal training is just not an option for us which is why we like judges to be instructors first and see how they can handle a class of students before we throw them to the wolves.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pfft, a poorly molded model is a great opportunity to be creative. Have a really ugly dent in the thigh of a giant from the metal not settling? Instant scar.

 

I wonder if there are kudos for cover ups like that.

 

If you covered it up that well, how would we know? So no, no specific kudos on something like that unless a judge was familiar enough with the piece to know what kind of effort it took to get a medal with it. And if you entered it in painters that would really fall into the prep work side of things and wouldn't have a huge affect on the score anyway.

 

Any by the way those percentages we show are just guidelines to keep the judges on track. So if a judge know a piece was a tough to paint up its still going to be judge, primarily, on your paintwork not your prep work.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a ton for posting this, Kris!  As a first time full-judge this year (after serving my apprenticeship last year), I can really say that we are all trying our best not to let any of our own personal prejudices negatively affect our scores; we want to see folks leveling up!

 

As far as techniques/styles go, I may say something like "too much gloss sealant is detracting from this mini" or "the drybrushing appears a little chalky" or something else along those lines, but pretty much every technique/style (I'm lumping them together on purpose) does have its place if executed well.  The trick is, I'm always leery of the "that's just my style" statement, which can sometimes come across as an excuse to use a familiar (but maybe not most appropriate) technique rather than a valid artistic defense.  Heck, I feel like I do the same thing at times when I may choose to avoid adding some wear and tear to a mini of mine because "my style is bright and happy".  Is that really the case, or am I just scared of "messing up" my mini with a possibly very appropriate technique that I feel I don't execute as well as other techniques?  What I am trying to say (maybe not very well...) is that every technique or style, when executed well, can and should receive its due affirmation and approval (and the judges want to give that!), but we all need to keep pushing ourselves to broaden our skill sets so that we can have the right "tools" ready for the "right" applications (understanding that art is subjective and that there may be many "right" tools and applications).

 

Hopefully that whole post has slightly more clarity than a puddle of mud...  :lol:

  • Like 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I can confirm on the tech side that the database of scores are remarkably consistent. I can find no instances where judges disagreed by more than 1 point. So 3/3/3, 3/3/2, and 3/2/2 are all fairly common variations and patterns in the scores, 1/3/4 occurs nowhere. And I find 3/3/3 and 2/2/2 to be by a fairly large margin the most common results.

 

The judges have all been pretty well trained to understand what a 1,2,3, and 4 should be, and the degrees of variation are all within reasonable variation for something as subjective as art.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great post.  We can all be frustrated, but since both you and Michael are local, I have eyes into the system better (being taught by Kris how to judge for local comps here) helps.  I see things I am sure others do not simply because I have been taught what to see.  Though I still miss it on my own mini at times.  Though this last time, I was happily surprised and disappointed all at once.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this was my first year as an apprentice judge and it was really fun and interesting!  I'd say after looking a lot of models, I started to get a sense of level of work, regardless of technique.  it was good for me to see what the judges look for and how the process goes- very educational. My mental numbers matched up most of the time.  I found I tend to be on the more critical side, which surprised me 'cause I'm a pushover in real life, but I didn't actually vote on many models- two maybe as the alternate. I guess it's because as a perfectionist, I always see the things that I can improve and that must carry over to judging.

 

I know the process can be stressful for the recipient.  We all want to be rewarded for our best work, and it can be frustrating when our hard work doesn't seem to match up with the award.  I've found feedback from the judges fantastic.  It helps me so much to know what they're seeing that I'm not.  heck, I cornered poor Derek at the end of the night when he must have been exhausted and asked him for feedback on my gold-winning tiefling.  because I want to get better.  I also worried that since I spend so much time on the forums, that this would interfere with my ability to be objective.  But since I see and often try to help out with most of you all, I guess it ends up cancelling out!

 

I guess what I most want to say is know that the judges are people who want everyone to both feel good and most importantly learn and improve.  Know that we're pretty much all introverts and when we give feedback and help, we're probably nervous!  And as the night goes on, also probably exhausted...  ^_^

  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Heisler
      I have started the process of contacting various miniature manufacturers about providing prizes for their miniatures that have been entered into the Reaper Con 2019 Painting Competition. I will update this first post as the various manufacturers let me know what they want to do. I'll take requests of companies to contact up through the end of April.
       
      First up is not an actual manufacturer award but I think a little variety is a good thing.
       
      Chibi Gamers Award
      Sponsored by Chibi Gamers (they have a facebook page) is the first annual Chibi Gamers Award. Gold, Silver and Bronze awards will be handed out to the best three Chibi miniatures (chibi's from all manufacturers will be considered) in the 2019 competition. The intent is for this to be an annual award so when in doubt paint a Chibi mini!
       
      Paint It Pink

      One in nine women will get this terrible disease in their lifetime. This has become close to home in our community this past year as one of our own is still fighting. 

      Can you create a piece of art that depicts one of the many facets of breast cancer? From awareness, support, education, hope, research, treatment, survivorship – breast cancer has touched almost everyone in some way. 

      Help us raise awareness through minis! Entering this contest simply says you care. A donation of any size is requested to enter. All donations will go to support breast cancer awareness and will be made in the name of the winner. 

      Oh, and a trophy... there will be trophies for the top 3.
       
      Manufacturer Awards
      (will fill in as manufacturers commit)
      Bombshell Miniatures
      Bombshell Miniatures presents the 2019 Golden Maelee Awards. This is a Sponsored Award section of the annual Reaper Master Series Open Painting Contest. We are very pleased to announce that this year Bombshell Miniatures will be awarding ALL its eligible entries with either a copper, silver, or gold medal. In addition, the top three entries overall will also be awarded our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place Maelee trophy.
       
      To be eligible for these awards, entries will need to feature at least one or more Bombshell Miniatures as the prominent subject. This can be anything from Babes, Sidekicks, Kritterkins, to robots, or busts. Each entry will be judged on its own merit of painting execution, presentation, and skill.

      Entries from artists who have been professionally commissioned by Bombshell Miniatures are ineligible.
       
      Frozen Ninja 3D
      The best Frozen Ninja 3D miniatures across all categories.
      1st Place $100
      2nd Place $50
      3rd Place $25
       
      Dark Sword
      Dark Sword Diorama Category:

      $150 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + $100 Cash + Trophy for best Dark Sword Diorama
      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Dark Sword Diorama
        

      Dark Sword Single Miniature Category:

      $150 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + $100 Cash + Trophy for best Dark Sword Single Mini
      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Dark Sword Single Mini

      Dark Sword Critter Kingdoms Anthropomorphic Animals Open Category:
      Can be either a single miniature or a diorama

      $150 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + $100 Cash + Trophy for best Critter Kingdoms
      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Critter Kingdoms
       
      Dark Sword Young Painter Category (Age 13 and under):
      Can be either a single miniature or a diorama

      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Trophy for best Dark Sword Young Painter
      $50 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Dark Sword Young Painter
       
      Tiger Lily Anthro Pug (ReaperCon 2018 Swag Bag Dark Sword Mini) Special Category*:
      Can be either a single miniature or a diorama including the Tiger Lily Anthro Pug Mini
      $150 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + $100 Cash + Trophy for best Tiger Lily entry
      $100 in Dark Sword Online Store Credit + Ribbon for 2nd place Tiger Lily entry

      Jason Wiebe and Jim from Dark Sword are working on creating something fun/cool to give to each entrant as a thank you for painting up the Tiger Lily tribute mini. As we get closer on the gift item, pics will be posted here and shared on the ReaperCon forums. 

      In addition, $300 cash will be offered to purchase one of the Tiger Lily entries from its painter to give as a gift to Jason Wiebe so he can have on display in his home in honor of the late great Tiger Lily. This will be something we go over the entries with Jason Wiebe on to find his favorite entry (which might differ from the prize ordering above). Please note - this purchase of the entry would be above and beyond any prizes won in the overall ReaperCon painting competition and the Dark Sword Mfr. Awards. And this is optional for the painter if approached (as a painter might want to keep the piece for their own collection). 

      * Any entry with the Tiger Lily Anthro Pug Miniature in it will automatically be put in this category as it relates to Dark Sword judging of the entry for the prizes listed above. The only exception to this would be the 13 and under category as the entry will be allowed to be judged in both and receive benefits from both categories. 

      The Dark Sword Miniatures Manufacturer Awards are open to all painters. To be eligible for the prize support listed above, the entries must be new entries, never entered into any other painting competitions. In addition, no entries can be commissions from Dark Sword Miniatures for painted studio models. This means Dark Sword studio painters can enter if they so desire, but their entries must be brand new creations not commissioned from Dark Sword and must also adhere to the eligibility requirements above. Please note - Dark Sword entries will also get the coveted "double dip" from being part of the overall ReaperCon painting competition as well. So one entry can potentially win multiple prizes/awards!
      Galladoria Games
      Galladoria is presenting a $100 First Prize for the best painted Galladoria Miniature in the competition and a $50 price for the runner up. They attended Reaper Con last year under the name Forge Prints. 
      DGS Games
      DGS Games will present manufacturer’s awards, DGS Master Crafter Coins, to participants in the Reaper Con Painting Competition in the Painters, Open, and Diorama categories.
      DGS will award a gold, silver and bronze coin to the top three participants in each category who made use of DGS Games models as their subject.
      DGS Games models may be converted but the conversion must employ only scratch materials or materials from other DGS Games models.  Models or parts of models from other manufacturers may not be used in any entry wishing to be considered for these awards.
      DGS Games will identify a panel of judges to award the Master Crafter Coins.  Each entry will be judged on its own merit of painting execution, presentation, and skill.
      Entries from artists who have been professionally commissioned by DGS Games are ineligible.
       
      Scale 75
       
      Scale 75
      Best Scale 75 Historical Figure or Bust
               $25.00 Coupon to our web store. 
       
      Best Scale 75 Fantasy Figure or Bust
               $25.00 Coupon to our web store. 
       
      Best Smog Rider (CHIBI)
               $25.00 Coupon to our web store.
       
      Bet Scale 75 piece overall piece by a junior
               $25.00 Coupon to our web store.
       
      Talon Games (CAV)
      Best Individual CAV Model: Any single-model figure.
      Best CAV "Squad": This category allows for multiple models (minimum four models) as part of a cohesive unit.
      Best CAV Diorama: This category covers models with a scenic base where the entry is telling a story to the viewer and may include multiple models.
    • By Heisler
      There are quite a number of threads regarding the Reaper Con Painting Competition. As Labor Day tends to get here at the speed of light I thought I would create a short index to the various threads. There is a lot of information useful to both the beginner and the veteran competition painter here, so pick a thread to start with and come join the fun!
      http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/60626-so-you-are-thinking-of-entering-the-painting-competition-at-reapercon/
      http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/71583-msp-open-judging-what-you-were-afraid-to-ask/
      http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/82720-judging-the-reaper-con-msp-open-painters-division/
      http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/82789-judging-the-reaper-con-msp-open-open-division/
      http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/82838-judging-the-reaper-con-msp-open-diorama-division/
      http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/83014-judging-the-reaper-con-msp-open-armorordnance-division/
      http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/85288-manufacturer-awards-for-the-reaper-con-2019-painting-competition/
    • By Heisler
      This is the fourth, and last, in a series of four posts each concentrating on a different entry category. You can find information about the scoring system itself in the Painter Division post. From here forward I will just concentrate on how the component guidelines apply to the other three divisions.
       
      Armor/Ordnance Division
      At MMSI in Chicago and elsewhere around the globe this category is usually filled with armor, planes, artillery and the like. At the MSP Open it is more along the lines of the red-headed stepchild. This division shares a lot with the Open Division with workmanship and creativity being big components of the scoring. While many entrants are willing to spend hours pouring over a single miniature and eradicating mold lines and filling gaps, they seem to be loath to do that with an entry into the armor/ordnance category. Just like the other divisions preparation is key, a visible mold line or a seam is likely to drop you a whole medal category in the judging. Since many of the entries are from plastic and resin kits visible seams are usually the biggest problem I see as a judge, following that would be mold lines in difficult to reach places. At the 2018 MSP Open there were a lot of larger Games Workshop pieces. Almost everyone single of these had visible mold lines in the hoses and seams in the armor panels on the back of the legs. This dropped everyone of these entries a medal level. Decals are often used in this division and there is nothing wrong with using them. You will get marked down for poor application though, treat a decal like freehand and don’t just slop it into place. There is a right way and a wrong way to apply decals and it can be a bit of an art to the proper application.
      Again, if you have just a single entry then the judges can just go ahead and score your entry, no discussion is necessary. If you have multiple entries, then there will be a discussion between the judges on which entry they want to score. That conversation is typically the only conversation although these discussions tend to be longer than they might be in the Painter Division. However, when selecting the scoring entry the conversation is still based on “I can score this one higher than the others” or words to that affect, till they come to a decision just as it would be for the Painter Division. If multiple entries are visually very thematic the judges may decide to judge them together as a single entry.
       
      Let’s take a quick look at the scoring guidelines the judges use (which is published as part of the MSP Open rules. These are guidelines are subject to change.
      Difficulty: 15%
      Creativity: 10% 
      Workmanship: 30%
      Painting Skill: 35% 
      Presentation: 10% 
       
      Difficulty: This and the Open Division are the places where difficulty does have a significant impact. The difficulty of assembling some of the kits available on the market can vary widely from manufacturer to manufacturer. Especially when dealing with a plastic kit like those produced by Tamiya and Games Workshop to the five piece resin game oriented kits put out by other manufacturers.
       
      Creativity: There is not a lot of creativity involved with a straight up kit build, but when someone goes to the extra lengths to “upgrade” their kits with after market or hand made parts that impacts the creativity component. This is the equivalent of a conversion in the other divisions.
       
      Workmanship: This is really a key component for this division and the proposed change reflects that. Any type of non-painting effort is represented here. This is includes your ability to do conversions and/or scratch sculpt or at least be able to blend your entry in with the scene you have constructed. A missed mold line, poor assembly or a poorly executed conversion could easily drop you a while numeric value in the scoring.
       
      Painting Skill: Everything that was said about painting still applies in the Diorama Division but there is less emphasis. At this point workmanship and creativity components exceed the painting component (as currently proposed). There are a few other mediums that are often used in this category, like weathering powders, the application of those mediums falls into the painting component. While we don’t expect your abilities to be exactly equal in those areas you cannot count on your ability to paint alone to carry you over the top.
       
      Presentation: While not the most important component in the Armor/Ordnance Division it is another example of getting the little things right. A nice, well executed base will set the “scene” for your entry. It can be the simple or it can be more elaborate. I would save the effort on a really elaborate base for an entry in the Open or Diorama divisions. This component is one that a judge will often use when making that final decision between scores, a tie breaker as it were.
    • By Heisler
      This is the third in a series of four posts each concentrating on a different entry category. You can find information about the scoring system itself in the Painter Division post. From here forward I will just concentrate on how the component guidelines apply to the other three divisions
       
      Diorama Division
      The Diorama Division does not exist in the MMSI structure. At MMSI a diorama goes into the Open Division as it encompasses the same set of skills. I, however, felt the Open Division ignored or down played the story and what is a diorama without a story?  This is the division that lets you show off the same skills that the Open Division does and wrap it around a story. Again if you have just a single entry then the judges can just go ahead and score your entry, no discussion is necessary. If you have multiple entries, then there will be a discussion between the judges on which entry they want to score. That conversation is typically the only conversation although these discussions tend to be longer than they might be in the Painter Division.  However, when selecting the scoring entry the conversation is still based on “I can score this one higher than the others” or words to that affect, till they come to a decision just as it would be for the Painter Division. 
       
      Let’s take a quick look at the scoring guidelines the judges use (which is published as part of the MSP Open rules. One cautionary note’ these particular scoring guidelines may change slightly):
      Difficulty: 15%
      Creativity: 15%
      Workmanship: 25%
      Painting Skill: 30%
      Presentation: 15%
       
      What does this mean for the Diorama Division? In this division we are really want to see all your hobby skills as well as your story telling ability. While the components remain the same the emphasis has obviously changed a great deal.
       
      Difficulty: This is a tough one for the Diorama category, since most dioramas are difficult to begin with. We reduced the emphasis here because we feel that you should not take a hit for a good story that is comparatively simple to tell.  
       
      Creativity: Creativity steps up a bit here.  While painting is still factor this is the portion that shows us the story you are telling. Now painting is combined with your ability to convert, sculpt and tell a story to your audience. The entrant’s imagination comes into play here, you are looking to tell a story to your viewers. You are striving for the audience to understand your story without commentary from you. It can be subtle or in your face but if you have to explain it then you have not succeeded.
       
      Workmanship: This remains a pretty straightforward component but in the Diorama Division there is a higher emphasis on it. It reflects how well constructed the entire piece is. Any type of non-painting effort is represented here. This is includes your ability to do conversions and/or scratch sculpt or at least be able to blend your miniatures in with the scene you have constructed. A missed mold line, poor assembly or a poorly executed conversion could easily drop you a while numeric value in the scoring.
       
      Painting Skill: Everything that was said about painting still applies in the Diorama Division but there is less emphasis. At this point workmanship and creativity components exceed the painting component. While we don’t expect your abilities to be exactly equal in those areas you cannot count on your ability to paint alone to carry you over the top.
       
      Presentation:  There is more emphasis on the is component as well. You are building the entire entry, essentially from scratch, and the presentation of everything you do affects the story. From the miniatures to the setting, this is where it all comes together. How you present it can be the difference between gold and silver.
    • By Heisler
      This is the second in a series of four posts each concentrating on a different entry category. You can find information about the scoring system itself in the Painter Division post. From here forward I will just concentrate on how the component guidelines apply to the other three divisions.
       
      Open Division
      The Open Division is far more of a freeform division than the Painter Division. Here is where you get to really strut your stuff with major conversions and scratch sculpts. If you have just a single entry then the judges can just go ahead and score your entry, no discussion is necessary. If you have multiple entries, then there will be a discussion between the judges on which entry they want to score. That conversation is typically the only conversation although these discussions tend to be longer than they might be in the Painter Division.  However, when selecting the scoring entry the conversation is still based on “I can score this one higher than the others” or words to that affect, till they come to a decision just as it would be for the Painter Division. If multiple entries are visually very thematic the judges may decide to judge them together as a single entry.
       
      Let’s take a quick look at the scoring guidelines the judges use (which is published as part of the MSP Open rules):
      Difficulty: 15%
      Creativity: 10%
      Workmanship: 30%
      Painting Skill: 30%
      Presentation: 15%
       
      What does this mean for the Open Division? In this division we are really want to see all your skills. While the components remain the same the emphasis has obviously changed a great deal.
       
      Difficulty: This is far more intuitive than it is in the Painter Division. The level of difficulty depends entirely on the difficulty of the conversion, with a minor conversion being the least difficult with graduations on up from there with a complete scratch sculpt being the most difficult.
       
      Creativity: Creativity stays about the same as it does for Painter. Painting is still a factor here. Now painting is combined with your ability to convert and sculpt to reach your audience. The entrant’s imagination comes into play here, you are looking for impact on the audience. Are you straining the boundaries of believability or are you trying to evoke a specific emotion from your viewers? Have you achieved what you set out to do at the end?
       
      Workmanship: This remains a pretty straightforward component but in the Open Division there is a higher emphasis on it. It reflects how well constructed the entire piece is. Any type of non-painting effort is represented here. Again a well done conversion means that the judge can’t tell that anything has been converted. A scratch sculpt should be properly proportioned and well sculpted (no thumb prints!). A missed mold line, poor assembly or a poorly executed conversion could easily drop you a while numeric value in the scoring. This is a category that we really encourage documentation, show us what you did and how you did it.
       
      Painting Skill: Everything that was said about painting still applies in the Open Division but there is less emphasis. At this point workmanship and painting are equal. While we don’t expect your abilities to be exactly equal in both areas you cannot count on your ability to paint alone to carry you over the top.
       
      Presentation:  There is more emphasis on the is component as well. If you are building the entire entry, essentially from scratch then the presentation of your entry is going to have a significant impact on how a viewer perceives your entry. Bring your entry to life!
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 138 Guests (See full list)

×