Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Rat13

New DM is throwing up too many red flags!

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, PaganMegan said:

I had a character that needed a spell called Emergency Clothes!

 

Shapechanger, full moon, you get the picture! ::P:

drdrch4-24.jpg

Don't ask....

 

The Auld Grump

  • Like 6
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Bruunwald said:

Here you go.

 

I blame my old computer for me thinking this had been taken down. As it aged, it sometimes would not load certain sites/blogs, etc., but would throw up scurrilous rumors of this site no longer being available, that one taken down, etc.

 

Anyway, enjoy!

Thank you so much for this, it gives me some perspective about my own experience. The story was incredible but the rebuttal had me laughing the whole time. 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Aryanun said:

I see a marvelous opportunity.

 

Guy just got stabbed in the middle of a feast? "THERE HE IS!"

 

**charge at Player #4 and start fighting**

 

Go for a TPK. See how quickly you can do it. Of course, have this all agreed to with other players beforehand. See how the DM responds.

 

A proper response would be a swift intervention via town or palace guard. Arrest the involved parties and start sorting it out.

 

I think what would happen under this guy would be a complete slaughter of everyone at the feast.

 

Even better if every player declares a different NPC or player to be the murderer. Just have 4 people charging off to fight 4 random NPCs. Make one of the NPCs you fight be the king or whoever...

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Unruly said:

 

Even better if every player declares a different NPC or player to be the murderer. Just have 4 people charging off to fight 4 random NPCs. Make one of the NPCs you fight be the king or whoever...

 

 Well, if you're going to do that, you might as well have the PCs accuse each other of the murder and start a Battle Royale over it.

 

Or, even better... Go full-on Spartacus, and have each PC declare that they're the one who killed the guy...  ::D:

 

 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mad Jack said:

 

 Well, if you're going to do that, you might as well have the PCs accuse each other of the murder and start a Battle Royale over it.

 

Or, even better... Go full-on Spartacus, and have each PC declare that they're the one who killed the guy...  ::D:

I love where this is going.

 

Every PC should come up with a reason for wanting him dead for "reasons" (cheated them out of a deal; slept with their significant other; murdered their parents; secret spy of a hostile nation; bad tipper; pet dog dug up your flower bed; etc.).

 

If the DM is railroading the adventure; might as well be a train robber and (heroically) take over the train.

Edited by Cranky Dog
  • Like 5
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Cranky Dog said:

I love where this is going.

 

Every PC should come up with a reason for wanting him dead for "reasons" (cheated them out of a deal; slept with their significant other; murdered their parents; secret spy of a hostile nation; bad tipper; pet dog dug up your flower bed; etc.).

 

If the DM is railroading the adventure; might as well be a train robber and (heroically) take over the train.

Hello, my name is (insert name). You killed my (spouse, parent, etc), prepare to die!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All else fails, Rock to Mud on the doorframe, kick the door down, walk out.

 

 .... I actually had a character do that once, just before I walked out of a session with a GM who was pants at GMing /and/ playing. To this day, Mr. Thorne and I call this guy Horse; he was dumb enough to think a horse could be brought into a dungeon and put on an elevator ...  without losing its horsey mind and turning itself into salami-paste. >.<

Mr. Thorne was /not impressed/.

 

We only saw him once again after the Rock to Mud dungeon. I'm /not subtle/ when I think someone is suffering an excess of stupid. Sadly, I'm not sure he learned anything....

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Sylverthorne said:

All else fails, Rock to Mud on the doorframe, kick the door down, walk out.

 

 .... I actually had a character do that once, just before I walked out of a session with a GM who was pants at GMing /and/ playing. To this day, Mr. Thorne and I call this guy Horse; he was dumb enough to think a horse could be brought into a dungeon and put on an elevator ...  without losing its horsey mind and turning itself into salami-paste. >.<

Mr. Thorne was /not impressed/.

 

We only saw him once again after the Rock to Mud dungeon. I'm /not subtle/ when I think someone is suffering an excess of stupid. Sadly, I'm not sure he learned anything....

i.e. Pit Ponies

 

He was right that it can be done. Wrong that they remained completely sane.

 

I could accept a special dwarven breed of mounts perfectly adapted, thriving even, for underground conditions. But any random mount will not be very cooperative.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cranky Dog said:

i.e. Pit Ponies

 

He was right that it can be done. Wrong that they remained completely sane.

 

I could accept a special dwarven breed of mounts perfectly adapted, thriving even, for underground conditions. But any random mount will not be very cooperative.

 

Yeah.. this was a full-sized .. can't remember if it was a heavy warhorse or not, but even leaving aside the part where horses aren't keen on dark, weird-smelling places, and this one was not trained in the slightest for being underground, it was a /horse/, and it weighed what horses weigh... *sigh*

There's a reason I don't build cavaliers for dungeon-crawls... and if I do, /they don't ride horses/.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/01/2018 at 5:29 AM, Unruly said:

He was warning them of the price that the well would take in exchange for the answers they sought, referencing his sacrifice of his own eye. It was meant to make them hesitate before rushing to drink, because the knowledge they sought was extremely valuable and a mortal's eye(as opposed to a god's) would not be near enough to pay.

 

Have your group heard of The Head of Vecna?

Edited by Balgin Stondraeg
  • Like 3
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Balgin Stondraeg said:

Have your group heard of The Head of Vecna?

It was a known story in my group in the early 90s. And our version was already translated in French (my native tongue).

 

Personally, the worst my group did was drink mud from fountain after one of them gained 1d8 permanent hit points, with no indication that why it happened, nor that it would work again.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/13/2018 at 10:26 AM, Cranky Dog said:

i.e. Pit Ponies

 

He was right that it can be done. Wrong that they remained completely sane.

 

I could accept a special dwarven breed of mounts perfectly adapted, thriving even, for underground conditions. But any random mount will not be very cooperative.

In one game I had a PC punch his mule when it refused to go down a steep narrow path along the face of a freakin' cliff, in an ice storm.... Then he pulled it along anyway... taking him, the mule, and the PC ahead of him all off the cliff.

 

The mule was the only one that did not survive the fall, and the one that least deserved it....

 

The Auld Grump

  • Like 2
  • Sad 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it a game you ran?
I would've fudged the dice to let the mule survive, but then again I'm always bummed in movies where the heroes take out the horse to get to its rider. Like, what did that horse ever do to you, Conan?

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Rat13
      After some interesting plumbing adventures the family and I are out of the house for the next couple weeks while repairs are made. Knowing that I'd need something to do in the evenings I had to make a tough call. I could gather up my painting supplies or I could grab one box, a knife, glue, and clippers. I obviously chose the easier route. So during our little forced vacation I'll be assembling the Robotech RPG Tactics starter box and giving you my thoughts on it. Not that I think anyone particularly wants to hear my thoughts on it, but if I'm going to build all this I'm going to talk about it.
       
      Before we jump into it I do want to mention that if you've ever heard anyone talk about this set I'm probably going to say a lot of the same things. I do however think I bring at least one new idea that somewhat redeems this box or at least changes the way you think about it.
       
      Right off the bat I've got to say it does have a nice box. It's fairly solid and the art not only on the outside but on the inside is a nice little addition. 
       
      When I first bought the box it was my intention to build the three configurations of a Veritech and stop. I already have too many projects and this was to be the reward after completing everything else. You better take a look at them before I start ranting.

       
      It was during the build of these first three models that I couldn't help but notice problems, you know the very ones we'd all already been warned about. The instructions are not always clear, all you get for each model is a deconstructed picture that can leave you guessing. Then to make it just a little more fun some components that are shown as being multiple parts just aren't. There is nothing like searching a sprue for a piece needed to complete a part before you realize its already attached.
       
      Then of course when it comes to "fiddly" bits these may be the fiddliest I've ever seen. There are a ton of parts that are tiny to the point of the simple act of removing them from the sprue breaks them. Remember this because we'll definitely be coming back to it.
       
      Even the larger pieces have their problems though. Most of the bigger pieces are multi-piece parts for no real reason. Maybe they're there to lull you into a sense of false comfort right before you start in on the "fiddly" bits.
       
      Now we come to the sprues themselves. They're not exactly horrible minus the times when you break a "fiddly" bit trying to remove it but they're not great. 
       
      After only assembling three I really wondered how they'd stand up to use on the tabletop. Even for display pieces they feel fragile. The detail is there but the construction and contact points are just bad, again we'll get back to that. 
       
      Confidence was not high after the first three figures. Then came about our impromptu vacation so I pressed on with the assembly and next up were the other Macross defenders, you know the cannon fodder, the Defenders and the Tomahawks.

      This is where I hit my stride. Overall I assembled them quickly, with many of the same complaints, but by then I'd become familiar with the idiosyncrasies of the set. It's also where I had the revelation that completely changed my attitude.
       
      You see these aren't miniatures and they really aren't game pieces, they're models. Models complete with all of the "fiddly" bits and needless multi-piece assembly you could expect. Once I started to think of them as models it bacame easier to accept the flaws and oversights. I couldn't exactly forgive or forget them, but at least they made a kind of sense. They're made like a Gundam model where the real accomplishment isn't in building it, it's in the fact that during the assembly you never threw it against the wall.
       
      Armed with my new outlook I started work on the special Zentraedi models. Even with the new outlook there were issues. Here are some "fiddly" bits I broke while removing them from the sprue. See just how tiny some of them are?
       
       Oh and remember those contact points I mentioned?

      That's how a leg attaches, a leg, you know the thing that is meant to support the whole model.
       
      Eventually I did complete the three special models however. 
       
      After reading all that it would be easy to think I hate this box. It'd be even easier to think I wouldn't recommend it. Even with all the issues however that isn't the case. I think under the right circumstances, I can recommend this to everyone they just have to meet certain criteria.
       
      Firstly you need to be a fan, because you'll need that love of the source material to keep going. The box needs to be on discount (bought mine for about $50 and that seems fair). It also helps to know exactly what you're getting into; before buying I'd already heard plenty of horror stories (still ended up buying it and I'm glad I did). Finally you need to think differently about the figures themselves, honestly once I started thinking of them as models like Gundams or even highly detailed planes everything bacame easier. If you check all of those boxes this is probably right up your alley. Don't ask me about gameplay however I already know I'll never find someone to play with, I just wanted the models. 
    • By UnreliableNarrator
      Hey! So I've been putting paint to minis for about two months, and I've yet to finish one up satisfactorily. So I thought I'd come here and ask y'all for some C&C for a struggling newbie.
       
      The Tiefling is an NPC baddie for my DM, and I'm struggling trying to get more detail on his face. I tried adding highlights to his t-zone to make it less flat but getting detail in such a tiny space is driving me mad. I'm also not happy with the highlights on the tail. How do ppl do faces on minis without much detail to the sculpt? 


       
      I've been struggling with transitions and blending/glazing. On the mouseling the transitions are supposed to be glazing but it just comes out more of a wash with a heavy load of pigment where it settles. I've tried wet blending, but I don't know how to get that on smaller or more detailed/textured areas.


       
      I'm a lot happier with my skelly boys, and I'm going to try NMM on the swords. I'm wondering how to reduce the shininess on the varnish (the middle one). I'm using Vallejo matte varnish, but there are still reflections under light.

      Thanks so much if you've read down all the way here! I know I've got a long way to go, so I'm looking forward to any and all C&C.
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Edit: Cut this down to just the ones I'm not happy with, and need advice on.
    • By stormbreach
      Warnings first, this image is linked for nudity.  I would like to ask for advice on this mini.  I might be finished or I might have to go back and paint her all over again.  I wanted her to look like bare wood, like raw lumber because she is part of the tree.  I wanted it to look kind of like she was the inside wood of the tree coming out through the bark but I think she ended up looking a little like regular skin.  So my question is does she look okay or should I paint her green instead to keep her from looking human?  Thanks for any advice you can offer.  Please also be advised, it isn't the best image but it gets the idea across.
       
      https://imgur.com/a/5CNeff6
    • By Dr_Automaton
      So the stars have aligned and Mudgullet has been released just in time for my group's Tomb of Annihilation playthrough.  I'm planning on going for a simple, suitably froghemoth-y color scheme but have realized that my palette is lacking in the greens department.  Oh, no!
       
      So, time to remedy this.  What should I grab from the MSP and Bones paint lines to give me a good selection of greens, while limiting the number of colors I need to buy (maybe 3-5 bottles this purchase)?  What are some of the colors you folk tend to reach for, with an eye towards versatility?  The Power Palette is only as good as the swatches it pulls from, and it's been my experience that Reapers paint swatches are very hit or miss, unfortunately.
       
      Thanks!
    • By DavePgh
      I hear horror stories about people getting frozen bottles of paint. Is there any way to tell if the paint has been frozen prior to using it? I was concerned about this when I did my holiday paint order, but it was a little unseasonably warm the day they were delivered. What does frozen paint look like & is there a way to salvage it if it has been frozen?
  • Who's Online   35 Members, 0 Anonymous, 35 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...