Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Pingo

Wreckage of USS Hornet found 77 years after she went down

Recommended Posts

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/fabled-wwii-aircraft-carrier-discovered-77-years-after-it-was-sunk/ar-BBTug8u

 

“The ship was found more than 17,000 feet below the surface, on the floor of the South Pacific Ocean near the Solomon Islands. The USS Hornet is best known for launching the important Doolittle Raid in April of 1942 and its role in winning the Battle of Midway. 

 

Richard Nowatzki, 95 now, was an 18-year-old gunner on Hornet when enemy planes scored several hits, reports CBS News' Mark Phillips.”

 

  • Like 16
  • Thanks 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To go along with this, the wreck of the Japanese battleship Hiei was found off the coast of Guadalcanal just last week. Both ships were lost in the same campaign, the Solomon Islands Campaign, about 3 weeks apart. Hornet on October 26th, Hiei on November 14th. Hornet was the last US fleet carrier to be sunk, while Hiei was the first Japanese battleship to be sunk. Both were scuttled and not outright sunk in combat. It can be argued that Hornet was lost in combat, since the Japanese technically sank her, but since the ship was fully abandoned and the only reason she was still floating was because of failed torpedo detonations I think it's unfair to claim she was a combat kill.

Edited by Unruly
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

This alternate link is for anyone else that experiences browser lockup at MSN:

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a26307644/aircraft-carrier-uss-hornet-world-war-ii-shipwreck/

 

It mentions (but no link <_< )there is a source website. 

 

Edit: which might be this:

https://www.paulallen.com/the-hunt-for-the-uss-hornet/#the-hunt-for-the-uss-hornet

 

 

 

Edited by TGP
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Unruly said:

To go along with this, the wreck of the Japanese battleship Hiei was found off the coast of Guadalcanal just last week. Both ships were lost in the same campaign, the Solomon Islands Campaign, about 3 weeks apart. Hornet on October 26th, Hiei on November 14th. Hornet was the last US fleet carrier to be sunk, while Hiei was the first Japanese battleship to be sunk. Both were scuttled and not outright sunk in combat. It can be argued that Hornet was lost in combat, since the Japanese technically sank her, but since the ship was fully abandoned and the only reason she was still floating was because of failed torpedo detonations I think it's unfair to claim she was a combat kill.

 

Surely both actions were part of the extended Guadalcanal campaign? Hornet is lost during the Battle of Santa Cruz. (Finally torpedoed by the Japanese destroyers Akigumo and Makigumo. So I really think this is a legitimate battle loss.) And Hiei is sunk at the Second Battle of Guadalcanal. The land battle for Guadalcanal lasts from the landing of 1st. Marine Division on 7th. August 1942 and ends when the Japanese finally evacuate the island on 7th. February 1943. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was talking to The Dad and my BIL about this yesterday. So much History. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, paintybeard said:

 

Surely both actions were part of the extended Guadalcanal campaign? Hornet is lost during the Battle of Santa Cruz. (Finally torpedoed by the Japanese destroyers Akigumo and Makigumo. So I really think this is a legitimate battle loss.) And Hiei is sunk at the Second Battle of Guadalcanal. The land battle for Guadalcanal lasts from the landing of 1st. Marine Division on 7th. August 1942 and ends when the Japanese finally evacuate the island on 7th. February 1943. 

 

Guadalcanal was part of the Solomon Islands Campaign, so yes. They were just lost in different engagements.

 

As for the Hornet being sunk by Akigumo and Makigumo, that's a stretch. She was sunk by Japanese torpedo and dive bombers, who bombed, torpedoed, and rammed her until she was unsafe to tow. At which point all crew were evacuated and the Americans put an additional 9 torpedoes and a couple hundred shells into her in an attempt to scuttle before the Japanese fleet got there. By the time Akigumo and Makigumo got there, she would have been a ghost ship with a huge list and she would have probably gone down on her own as she slowly flooded. The only reason she wasn't already under water was because most of the American torpedoes failed to explode.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Early War American torpedos had a detonator problem. Frustrated submarine skippers as well. 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter who 'sunk' her, she was lost, along with her brave souls, who were doing something, that unfortunately needed done. May her and her souls rest at ease.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TGP said:

Early War American torpedos had a detonator problem. Frustrated submarine skippers as well. 

Detonator problems, guidance problems, launch problems, propulsion problems - the Mark I torpedoes were a freakin' mess.

 

It was not unknown for the torpedo to come back full circle.

 

The Auld Grump - my dad served in the submarine fleet in WWII and the Korean War.

Edited by TheAuldGrump
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have all made my day better. I love me some History. 

 

In spite of the Americans shelling the bejeesus out of her aren't the final Type 93s actually credited with being what sunk her? Or am I misremembering? 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Loim said:

You have all made my day better. I love me some History. 

 

In spite of the Americans shelling the bejeesus out of her aren't the final Type 93s actually credited with being what sunk her? Or am I misremembering? 

 

No, you're remembering correctly. I just disagree with the record for the reasons I stated.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Unruly said:

 

No, you're remembering correctly. I just disagree with the record for the reasons I stated.

Think of it as the Mercy Shots that just allowed that Great Lady to slide under a little quicker.

GEM

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the frightening statistics of the Guadalcanal Campaign is that 75% of Japanese deaths were due to starvation and island diseases.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Rigel
      Didn't order this fella; there was a minor mixup in my order (which was corrected, I must say, with incredible speed--thank you, North Star/Artizan customer service!). BUT--I'll not complain about more pulp-era characters to paint! The Desert Fox is pretty useful for a variety of campaigns of varying pulp levels.
      Tried to make the colors match his official portrait. Here he is in a North African setting, with a toy car that is historically inaccurate but a good color match. A tank would have been better, but as we all know, a field-marshal goes to war with the army he has, not the army he wants.



      Other angles below.


      I call this one "Erwin Has A Bad Day." Special guest appearances by WWWOz Lion, Zenith, and Frank Buck. 

    • By Rigel
      This implausibly zaftig Soviet lady (50226) has been painted up for well over a year, but I didn't want to take pictures until I had a good background. The propaganda posters for the Moon Communists took care of that problem, though! Comrade Kozlov comes with some rubble, timbers and a brick wall, which I elected to use as set dressing, A few coffee stirrers made a barricade of the right height for her to lean on. Give her a line of sight down the Stalingrad streets and she will be Death in high boots.

      I'm not even going to make a pretense towards accuracy on the uniform. I just like that pale greyish purple. (I think it was Slaanesh "grey" mixed with a drop of dark blue or maybe purple wash). 



      More Soviets inbound! 
    • By Red The White
      Hello, compatriots! I am a college student in desperate need of useful sources of information! I have taken upon the task of writing my final project in my composition class on the history of wargaming and tabletop miniatures. Painting miniatures is potentially my biggest hobby, and it seemed like an excellent topic for a paper. I need to do a 12-minute elevator pitch of my paper next Friday, and the paper itself must be 2,500 words and is due at the end of the semester (May 5th).
       
      The issue is, I'm having difficulty finding sources that I can cite. I'd go hunting for books, but I don't have a whole ton of time to wait for shipping. So, I've come to you folks. If there are any sources that you are aware of that will help me in my journey, please post them here. If there are important people I could potentially email and ask questions of, that would be cool, too. I already have some info with W. Britain beginning production of hollow lead toy soldiers and the publication of H.G. Welles' "Little Wars". I'd like to know more about when and how painting miniatures for wargames became a hobby of its own, major changes in the miniature manufacturing industry, key players, where we are today, etc.
    • By SisterMaryNapalm
      After I started working on my Soviet Russian girls, I soon noticed that I missed some usable terrain.
       
      So it was time for me to start making some.
       
      I checked my stuff and ... unfortunately I didn't have got any usable terrain. But I had some 28mm Warhammer 40k barrels and boxes. So ... what to do with those? ...
       

       

       
      Luckily I am a person full of ideas and dreams and melancholy. So I remembered back in the days when I was young, I played a game called "Blitzkrieg".
       
      "Blitzkrieg" was a lovely game using a lovely graphic engine for displaying things. And they had this wonderful supply depot, which I think would be perfect
       

       

       
      First off I have have to prepare some boxes to later have a good foundation for the blanket.
       

       
      ... which ended in in looking like this:
       

       

       

       

       
      Time to paint!
    • By Madog Barfog
      I'm painting Barnabus Frost, Pirate Captain, and came across an odd situation. On his left side, possibly hanging from his belt, there is an approximately trapezoidal shape that has three tassels hanging from it. I've seen things like it before, being an SCA member and fairly familiar with historical clothing, but I have no idea what it's called or if it serves any use beyond decoration.
       
      I searched Google images, but that was no help. Does anyone know what this could possibly be? For your reference, here is the best picture I could locate of the item:
      Most people seem to paint it the same color as his coat, but I like to be as accurate as I can in my painting and would like more information on this interesting object.
  • Who's Online   33 Members, 0 Anonymous, 133 Guests (See full list)

×