Jump to content

Recommended Posts


My name is Dom and I'm new to the world of minis. I started fiddling away with Procreate in the fall of 2017, trying to make some minis for a D&D campaign I play in. I roughed out two ghoulish-looking figures (which weren't supposed to be ghouls), grew pretty frustrated with it, and shelved the whole business for 2018. I decided to give it another go in January, and started another five for a new D&D campaign. Progress was slow but better than the first go-round, and spurred on by an opportunity to apply for a mini design talent program with a large company, I finally finished my first two minis last week!

My photographs highlighted plenty of issues I wish I'd had time to address, but the deadline for the application was upon me. 

They're mottled because I was trying out different mixtures of putties, trying to figure out what suits my purposes best. I have a good bit of sculpting experience from a former job (not at this small scale) and am more used to an add-then-refine method, rather than having to get it just-so because the materials don't like being sanded or carved. Once I got some Aves Apoxie Sculpt, I became much more hopeful.

Here's Aldin Peaksplitter, a Dwarven battlerager who doesn't wear armor and likes to fight hand-to-hand, and Albrecht Glasser, a human divination wizard who masquerades as a fortune teller.

The funny bit between Aldin's left thigh and elbow is just a vent for casting purposes. I did make a mold of him because I wanted to submit photos of nice primed castings, but it hit a snag and I didn't have time to redo it before the deadline. With Albrecht you can see some copper armature in places - I thought I'd found a good way to negate some of my Procreate frustrations in the armature phase, but it went awry. Once I learned of the program I wanted to apply for, he was too far along to start over, so I made do.

I'd love to hear your thoughts.





Edit: These are 28mm or about 1/60 scale, based on the character's height. Aldin would be about 25mm tall if standing erect (he's a tall Dwarf), and Albrecht about 30mm.

Edited by CivilDungeoneer
  • Like 22
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum!

I'm more of a painter and can only say that I think these look pretty good!


The Sculptors that roam around this place will have more useful comments/advice for you I guess.

Anyway, have fun!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nicely done!


I love the suspenders on the dwarf.


And I can just imagine the human dropping the book (which is, I'm sure, the Marquess of Queensberry Rules) and adopting the formal stance of a pugilist.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CivilDungeoneer said:

@Gadgetman! That's good to hear; thanks! My molding and casting skills are more practiced, if a bit rusty, than my sculpting, so I hope to make minis to sell someday.


Well, if you want to be able to sell to me remember that I'm all in for the femmes.

Sexy femmes, strong femmes, strong AND sexy, striking, different...  

(One of my all-time faves is the 'Half-Orc Barbarian' from Oathsworn's 'Heroines in Sensible Shoes' series. Check it out. It's awesome)


Have you considered other scales also, if you plan to be doing your own casting?


  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Gadgetman! said:

Have you considered other scales also, if you plan to be doing your own casting?

As I'd intended making minis for the sort of basic 1" = 5' D&D mini market, I have been intending on this specific scale. Larger scales would definitely be easier. Did you have something particular in mind?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

From the Double Barreled Critiques thread:


48 minutes ago, CivilDungeoneer said:

I do wonder what's up with my photography, because neither the fur nor the hair translate well compared to what I see on the figure in person. I used a similar technique as you described in the hair comment, but I'll work on that too


I'm not the sculptor guy, so I didn't want to respond in that thread. But one of the things I do is photography. What I'm seeing is some combination of the following:

  • Your primary lighting is coming from the top of the figures rather than the front. I'm guessing that this might be from a lightbox of some sort and they don't really work very well for minis.
  • Your background is currently very bright, some of which is bleeding around the figure.
  • And because of the bright background, it looks like the original photo might have been underexposed and the exposure boosted in post processing, which reduced the sharpness of details.
  • And I suspect that you might have done quite a lot of cropping to get to the shots you have here.

So suggestions:

  • To show texture, you want to have low, raking light. This works best if it's going across details rather than with the grain of them. (This is rather like the way that when you drybrush, you don't run the brush along, but rather across, the detail you want to emphasize.) Specifically, the light above the hair makes the shadows that define the detail mostly disappear. If you light more from the side, the detail will show more.
  • Much of the front of the figure is in shadow, again because you're lighting from the top. Rather than using a lightbox, put lights mostly level with the figure and forward of a line perpendicular to the line from camera to subject. This will give you the light to see the shoe detail.
  • The white background that takes up most of the frame of the shot can be a problem, especially for an automatic exposure mode. Either set your exposure manually, use exposure compensation to increase the base exposure of the photo, or use a darker background (mid-gray works well).
  • And if you can get decent focus on a smaller field of view by moving the camera closer or using a longer lens (not digital zoom, which is just in-camera cropping), that might be useful. But it will also reduce your depth of field, so consider that. FWIW, and if you aren't already using one, a cell phone camera generally has very good depth of field for any given distance from lens to subject.

For more information, you might want to take a look here:





  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

@Doug Sundseth


Hi Doug - your eyes don't lie!


I slapped together a lightbox in my workshop because (reasons that don't matter). I did have to crop in - the square photos are just about 1/5th total pixels of the original shots. It would've been about 30% if I had kept the aspect ratio.


I did boost exposure in post. I was using a DSLR and I was using a very narrow f-stop to give me a better depth of field, and something like a 3-second exposure, and it got me close to what I wanted. Next time I hopefully either won't be on a deadline or will have managed my time better so I can get those settings lined up properly - garbage in, garbage out! My smartphone doesn't seem to play nice with depth of field on these little guys - if I'm close enough to get it to focus (even with my setting the focal area), seems like half the figure is too close/far to be in focus.


I'll give that link a read, and see what I can rig up for lighting in the manner you describe. I'll incorporate your background suggestion, too. These make logical sense.

Thanks for the help and support! What a great bunch of folks around here :)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Metalchaos
      Good day everyone, I've been working on a diorama display for some time now and I thought some of you may like the see my progress. I used AutoCad for my sketches and Inventor to build the 3D model. Then I used Blender to texture the model and Slicer to generate de code for my Prusa printer. The following pictures are the steps I went through so far. It’s my first big project. It's taking long but it's a learning experience. Let me know what you think about it so far.
      The first image is a screenshot of the final model in Inventor.

      Some sketches in AutoCad software.

      Floor part in Invetor software.

      Generating the code of the floor in Prusa Slicer software.

      I got a printing error while printing the floor. The plastic filament and I had to stop the print.

      On the next picture, we can see how the parts are on the inside. There is some supports but most of the part is empty to save on printing time and material.

      I decided to print the remining floor tiles individually to salvage what I had already been printing. I then glued each tile on the base.

      I had another printing error on the column, and I had the print another one.

      The column was printed at the highest level of quality my Prusa i3 MK3S can print, which is at a 0.05mm of precision.

      The arch was also printed at 0.05mm.
      The level of detail is amazing. Even the ring was printed flawlessly without support.

      Here’s a screenshot of the wall assembly after I completed texturing it in Blender.

      Here’s a screenshot of the wall assembly in Slicer. I generated the code with supports to make sure the door arch would be print perfectly.

      It looks perfect like this, so I didn’t see a problem coming.

      Some parts of mu model were not right, there were some gaps. The software filled these gaps with support material, so when I see the issue, I decided not to stop the printing session. The support material is showing in drak green the the simulation.

      After, when I generated the code without support, I could clearly see the gaps. I think this happened because there were errors, holes I didn’t correct or masking I didn’t remove, on the model I imported from Blender. I will need to investigate farther.

      See the result after I removed all the support. Removing the support takes forever by the way. I’ll try to avoid supports if possible, in the future.

      Here’s a picture of the wall. It took 40 hours to print only and probably another 40 hours to build, texture and clean the model. I still need to fill the gaps the Greenstuff.

      Here are all the parts I printed for this project.

      And, all the parts together. I haven’t glue anything yet. There is still some sanding and cleaning to do. I will paint each part separately.

      I patched the gaps with liquid Green Stuff.

      Closeup of the first layer of liquid Green Stuff.

      I converted a 02712 Eye Best from Reaper Miniatures. This is the pewter version of model that was sculpted by Julie Guthrie. I added eye stalks from the 03440 Creature Components II, also from Reaper.



      The Eye Best will be pinned on the wall and the door. All the adventurers I'll be displaying on the diorama are from Reaper Miniatures Dungeon Dwellers brand. From left to right; 07012 Caerindra Thistlemoor, 07004 Stitch Thimbletoe, 07002 Baran Blacktree and 07008 Luwin Phost.


      The models can be moved from a recess to another to allow different layouts.


      More to come soon!
    • By Crowley
      After converting Ingrid to better match the character she's going to represent (giving her a bow and rapier), last night I got to painting.

      I started with thinned down brown liner, then went straight to the eyes with Linen White. Surf Aqua was used for her irises, and brown liner for the pupil. I painted her flesh with a 2:1 Warrior Flesh: Linen White mix. Her hair is Blond Shadow with highlights of Tanned Leather. Her lower lip is a 1:1 blend of her flesh tone with Old West Rose.

      The armor, gloves, boots were painted with a thinned Rich Leather. The bow and scabbard are painted with a mix of Brown Liner and Rich Leather. Her cloak was painted with Mountain Stone, and then washed with a 1:2:2 mix of Grey Liner: Mountain Stone: Flow Improver.

      Because I want to bring her to game on Wednesday, and don’t think I’ll get any more time to work on her between now and then, I picked out the end of the scabbard and the tips of the bow with Dragon Bronze, and gave the base a quick wet brush of Redstone Shadow.

      Not bad for a night's work...
    • By Sulka
      Hey there, I'm very new to sculpting, and i was hoping for some advice in removing the "seams" that show up when you add a new blob of greenstuff onto your model, I've been using Vaseline, and a small slightly rounded steel dental tool for the bulk of my sculpt, i can get most of the height difference to go away, but the seam is still visible, I'm mostly trying to blend it into other soft green stuff underneath it, i don't have too much trouble blending a soft layer into a cured layer,  any advice, tips or techniques 
      Also, I appreciate all the great tips I've already found on the forum, its saved me from having to do a lot of trial and error on my own
    • By ChristopherGeorge
      Hi Guys!

      Another quick update! I've just finished adding hair onto Deva. I love this sculpt, the only thing that i didn't like was that she was bald. I wanted more of a Valkyrie descending from heaven look for the model as i'm going to need it for an upcoming campaign. So, out comes the greenstuff. I'd previously experimented with adding beards to models and i figured that hair couldn't be much different could it? Turns out it's really different. Hair flows in different ways to beards, particularly if you're wanting long flowing locks of the stuff.

      Still, i'm very happy with how it came out even if it took me most of an afternoon just to do add strands into the hair locks.

      As far as colouring goes, nothing to controversial, while dress, silver armour. I added alot of blue highlights to the base of the dress, trying to go for an ethereal summoning vibe.The wings caused me a little grief as i was going for more of a pigeon white colour, until i realised that was really understated, so I added a touch of gold and silver and that really brought out the highlights. I thought the effect was so good, i gave it another coat. In hindsight the second coat of silver may have been a mistake, but still. Live and learn.

      Anyway guys, As always comments/critiques are appreciated, but please be gentle i've only just picked up painting again and i'm still trying to learn the ropes :)

      Have fun,
      Christopher George

    • By Gargs
      Quick question regarding Bones and Greenstuff.  I have a couple of Bones minis I'm going to be painting up here shortly that desperately need some gap filling done on them.  I know that Bones minis generally do not need to be primed (other than maybe a thin layer of liner) but how does the GS used to fill gaps interact?  Do I still need to hit it with some primer?  
      On a related question, have any of you used the liquid green stuff?  I'm assuming that it is also potentially pretty hard on brushes, much like brush on primer, but was curious as to what your experiences were.  Some of the areas I want to fill are actually fairly small gaps, so the liquid GS seems like it would be a good match.
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 38 Guests (See full list)

  • Create New...