Jump to content

Itty bitty hobbit eyes, magnification and the quest for perfection


Recommended Posts

So I'm working on a really small figure a newish Tom Meier Halfling Druid from DarkSword Miniatures.

 

I painted the eyes and was kind of satisfied with them but one seems to be bigger than the other, which means I think I painted the black first outside of the target eye that was sculpted. One eye is okay the other one it too big:

 

404491102_ThunderbolthobbitessWIPAcopy.jpg.660cfa013dfcc4bfc64e2ff1ed17e058.jpg

 

so when we get really close to the figure I can see how uneven she is, but she is really, really small:

 

1109369387_ThunderbolthobbitessWIPC.JPG.74e42c8e053bf35ea3605b753bb41356.JPG

 

So my first general question is, would this be enough to frustrate somebody to repaint?  

 

So with this in mind, the "good" news is I just went from a nice pair of magnifying nerd goggles that go up to around 2.5 to some other ones that I have sitting around that are 3.5 x magnification.  So I almost feel I have a good enough view of the eyes to edit it a little bit.  I'm just wondering if it's all worth it?  Any suggestions?

 

 

 

 

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

First, you are doing what any good painter does, question our final results. Under magnification, the slight difference is noticeable. Under normal view, she is delightful. I would not touch a thing.

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Corsair said:

First, you are doing what any good painter does, question our final results. Under magnification, the slight difference is noticeable. Under normal view, she is delightful. I would not touch a thing.

So after writing this, I came into my nerd cave and tried to fix her and I think she turned out okay. Will do another closeup soon to display the difference. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, 72moonglum said:

So after writing this, I came into my nerd cave and tried to fix her and I think she turned out okay. Will do another closeup soon to display the difference. 

 

You're a braver soul than I!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 72moonglum said:

Or just more anal, can’t say which..

 

In the immortal words of the cartoon Archer: "Phrasing!"

 

Sorry, I lost the battle to my inner immature teenager. Can't win 'em all.

 

To the topic at hand, at those pics, for me, her eyes up close look better to me than from at a distance. They pupils look really small from the distance pic, but that is just my perception. The big question is, are you happy with them?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ManvsMini said:

 

In the immortal words of the cartoon Archer: "Phrasing!"

Yeah, probably could have phrased that a bit better

Sorry, I lost the battle to my inner immature teenager. Can't win 'em all.

No worry whatsoever, happens to me all the time, like every time somebody says duty.

To the topic at hand, at those pics, for me, her eyes up close look better to me than from at a distance. They pupils look really small from the distance pic, but that is just my perception. The big question is, are you happy with them?

With lots of Tom Meier models, his eyes are so small because they are a bit more proportionate to a real head instead of a more stylized sculpt.  

 

And the answer to your query is No, I’m really not as happy as I could be, so went in to fix them. Now I’ve got to take a closeup picture to see if you can even notice a difference.  

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By 72moonglum
      Good morning Reaperniks!
       
      So I've had this mini painted already about a week, but here in Omaha, it's been mostly kind of cloudy and rainy, so wasn't able to get a decent picture until this morning.
       
      This is Merlyon the Sorcerer, formerly of Thunderbolt Mountain and now being released by Ral Partha Legacy. Pretty fun figure to paint, and it's more akin to that 25 mm of yore:
       

       
      I still have a few more from this range I want to get around to painting. This one also had the eyeholes poked into the eyes, but they worked out this time pretty simply.
      Eyeholes in the owl too!
       
      Anyhoos, please enjoy responsibly!
       
       
    • By 72moonglum
      So hello all you Reaperphonics!  
       
      So finished this one recently.  I'd done the other Flying Pink Unicorn, and wanted a slightly different version of pink, so here's what I came up with.  This one, like the other fairy ballerinas, was sculpted by Tom Meier inspired by a design from his daughter with his company Thunderbolt Mountain Miniatures and now sold by Ral Partha Legacy.  Lots of different pictures because it's mini with basically lots angles, not just front and back, hope not too many photos:
       

       
      They are the last of my ballerina fairies that I had from Ral Partha Legacy, going to have to now move on to something different I guess, maybe some Reaper Bones.....
    • By 72moonglum
      Hello all you Reaperoloques, anxiously waiting for your Kickstarter boxes to arrive at your doors!
       
      I got my notice and hopefully I'll be seeing a big, beautiful box of plastic joy this Wednesday!  But in the meantime, just plugging away painting...
       
      So I just finished these two Thunderbolt Mountain minis, and if you recall last time, I took y last photos with my new iPhone.  I considered doing this again with these two minis, but took photos with my camera and then with the iPhone, and the iPhone photos were too brash or stark, so I'm using the camera photos instead.
       
      First Morgan le Fay:
       

       
      and then the Lady in Waiting:
       

       
      Both of these are available again for sale on Ral Partha Legacy's site, and actually they both come in the foot and mounted versions, but way back when, when I bought these, I didn't get the mounted versions, just their standing forms. 
       
      Enjoyed doing both of them very much.  The only odd thing again were they had those eyes with recesses for the irises, which I don't really like, but at least in this case worked out I think okay.  I actually did a base walnut brown cover for the eyes and then when I went over them in white, the recesses remained unpainted and brown, so they turned out okay.  I think for the future though, with more of these recessed eyeballs I'll actually paint the color in that section and then go over them again with white. 
       
      Another thing to mention is these are true 25 mm figures, when that used to mean something, so these are very small.  
       
      Anyhoos, hope you enjoy and these can momentarily distract you whilst you wait for your boxes to arrive!
       
      Happy Independence Day for those gringos that celebrate it, and Happy Sunday for those that don't!
       
       
    • By 72moonglum
      Hello all you mortals hanging from this Reaper coil!
       
      So tonight is another Tom Meier miniature, from his Arthurian range, which is now once again available at Ral Partha Legacy, the Lady of the Lake.  I'm really starting to get into these figures even with their small sizes and petite little heads. These are true 25 mm figures.  Got a few more kind of schedule to work on in the near future as well:
       

       
      and a close up of her face, which, with my new iPhone I can apparently get very close up:
       

       
      and a back view:
       

       
      The only bummer about this one was I made her what I thought was going to be a nice little base, because she doesn't come on a base.  You can either glue her to a small square metal base or create something.  So I did a base which had "water" at the edge.  After I got it done and it dried though, I tried to get her on it, and her cloak was so long and straight across, I couldn't get it to accommodate itself to the base in a flat way to make it look good.  So I just threw some putty on another base, let it dry, and then just painted if simple blues.
       
      Her color scheme itself is some pretty monotone colors, lots of blues, with just the flowers in her hair to have some bursts of color. 
       
      Anyway, hope you enjoy!
       
       
       
       
    • By 72moonglum
      Good evening Reaper Hoppers and Poppers,
       
      So I just finished this miniature, who is a pretty small one. She's Gwenyvere, from Tom Meier's Arthurian line at Thunderbolt Mountain, currently being produced by Ral Partha Legacy.
       
      I just got a new iPhone, and I took the pictures with it.  I think the pictures came out really nicely, and have done an automatically good job on the exposure and all.  My concern is does the automization of the exposure make it any different than if I would have had to work a little bit with the exposure?
       

       
      To give a comparison, here is how my camera turned out:
       

       
      It's a lot darker.
       
      Anyhoos, looking for photographic opinions. 
       
      And to give you an idea of how small this figure it is, here she is in comparison to a US quarter:
       

  • Who's Online   35 Members, 1 Anonymous, 32 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...